取证过程中诉讼程序的司法和法律集中性

Legestic Pub Date : 2024-06-07 DOI:10.5219/legestic.10
Iveta Lajošová
{"title":"取证过程中诉讼程序的司法和法律集中性","authors":"Iveta Lajošová","doi":"10.5219/legestic.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper provides a comprehensive analysis of judicial and legal concentration of proceedings, particularly focusing on evidence taking. The principle of concentration of proceedings, which aims to optimize procedural steps, is central to this study. By ensuring that all relevant objections, evidence, and arguments are presented at a predetermined stage of the process—whether by statutory requirements or judicial discretion—the principle seeks to enhance procedural efficiency and fairness. The paper examines both statutory concentration, mandated by law, and judicial concentration, applied at the judge's discretion. The analysis explores how these mechanisms contribute to the procedural economy, prevent unnecessary delays, and motivate litigating parties to fulfill their procedural duties promptly. Furthermore, the paper discusses the historical development of concentration principles in Slovak law, the impact on procedural obligations, and the balance between procedural strictness and flexibility. The findings highlight the importance of concentration in achieving timely and effective judicial rulings while maintaining the legal guarantees of a fair trial.","PeriodicalId":503689,"journal":{"name":"Legestic","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Judicial and legal concentration of proceedings in the context of evidence-taking\",\"authors\":\"Iveta Lajošová\",\"doi\":\"10.5219/legestic.10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper provides a comprehensive analysis of judicial and legal concentration of proceedings, particularly focusing on evidence taking. The principle of concentration of proceedings, which aims to optimize procedural steps, is central to this study. By ensuring that all relevant objections, evidence, and arguments are presented at a predetermined stage of the process—whether by statutory requirements or judicial discretion—the principle seeks to enhance procedural efficiency and fairness. The paper examines both statutory concentration, mandated by law, and judicial concentration, applied at the judge's discretion. The analysis explores how these mechanisms contribute to the procedural economy, prevent unnecessary delays, and motivate litigating parties to fulfill their procedural duties promptly. Furthermore, the paper discusses the historical development of concentration principles in Slovak law, the impact on procedural obligations, and the balance between procedural strictness and flexibility. The findings highlight the importance of concentration in achieving timely and effective judicial rulings while maintaining the legal guarantees of a fair trial.\",\"PeriodicalId\":503689,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Legestic\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Legestic\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5219/legestic.10\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legestic","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5219/legestic.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文全面分析了诉讼程序的司法和法律集中问题,尤其侧重于取证问题。程序集中原则旨在优化程序步骤,是本研究的核心。通过确保所有相关的反对意见、证据和论据都在程序的预定阶段提出--无论是法定要求还是司法裁量权--该原则旨在提高程序效率和公正性。本文对法律规定的法定集中和法官自由裁量的司法集中进行了研究。分析探讨了这些机制如何促进程序经济、防止不必要的延误并促使诉讼各方迅速履行其程序职责。此外,本文还讨论了斯洛伐克法律中集中原则的历史发展、对程序义务的影响以及程序严格性与灵活性之间的平衡。研究结果强调了集中原则在实现及时有效的司法裁决、同时维护公平审判的法律保障方面的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Judicial and legal concentration of proceedings in the context of evidence-taking
This paper provides a comprehensive analysis of judicial and legal concentration of proceedings, particularly focusing on evidence taking. The principle of concentration of proceedings, which aims to optimize procedural steps, is central to this study. By ensuring that all relevant objections, evidence, and arguments are presented at a predetermined stage of the process—whether by statutory requirements or judicial discretion—the principle seeks to enhance procedural efficiency and fairness. The paper examines both statutory concentration, mandated by law, and judicial concentration, applied at the judge's discretion. The analysis explores how these mechanisms contribute to the procedural economy, prevent unnecessary delays, and motivate litigating parties to fulfill their procedural duties promptly. Furthermore, the paper discusses the historical development of concentration principles in Slovak law, the impact on procedural obligations, and the balance between procedural strictness and flexibility. The findings highlight the importance of concentration in achieving timely and effective judicial rulings while maintaining the legal guarantees of a fair trial.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An unlawfully obtained vs. unlawfully taken evidence in civil litigation Judicial and legal concentration of proceedings in the context of evidence-taking Legal union of a same-sex couple in the Slovak Republic and the scope of recognition of such unions validly established abroad
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1