Jakartapost.com 报道 2024 年印尼总统候选人的态度和政治理念

IF 0.4 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH REGISTER Journal Pub Date : 2024-06-06 DOI:10.18326/register.v17i1.123-145
Yopi Thahara, Ahmad Yusuf Firdaus, Firqo Amelia, Sufil Lailiyah, N. F. Novitasari, Dwi Taurina Mila, R. H. Khissoga
{"title":"Jakartapost.com 报道 2024 年印尼总统候选人的态度和政治理念","authors":"Yopi Thahara, Ahmad Yusuf Firdaus, Firqo Amelia, Sufil Lailiyah, N. F. Novitasari, Dwi Taurina Mila, R. H. Khissoga","doi":"10.18326/register.v17i1.123-145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research examines the evaluation of attitudes in 5 articles from Jakartapost.com regarding the electoral debate of presidential candidates. As a mass media outlet targeting readers both domestically and internationally, Jakartapost.com is required to maintain neutrality in reporting on presidential debates. Therefore, the research aims to understand the attitudes and political ideology of 2024 Indonesian presidential candidates reported by Jakartapost.com. The news was analyzed using the appraisal system proposed by Martin and White (2005), categorizing attitudes into affect, judgment, and appreciation. This research utilized qualitative methods with embedded case study and Spradley’s analysis to identify cultural patterns and themes within the data. The results showed that attitudes consisted of 39.7% negative and 24.6% positive judgments, 16.4% negative and 8.2% positive appreciations, and 9.6% negative and 1.4% positive affects. The appraisal system can identify political ideologies of the three presidential candidates. Anis Baswedan and Ganjar Pranowo express conflicting attitudes towards the current government, indicating their role as opposition and socialist populism, while Prabowo Subianto aligns himself with the current government known as technocratic populism. Journalists tend to assess Prabowo more positively compared to other candidates, suggesting a bias towards supporting him in the 2024 election.","PeriodicalId":40585,"journal":{"name":"REGISTER Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Attitude and Political Ideology of 2024 Indonesian Presidential Candidates Reported in Jakartapost.com\",\"authors\":\"Yopi Thahara, Ahmad Yusuf Firdaus, Firqo Amelia, Sufil Lailiyah, N. F. Novitasari, Dwi Taurina Mila, R. H. Khissoga\",\"doi\":\"10.18326/register.v17i1.123-145\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research examines the evaluation of attitudes in 5 articles from Jakartapost.com regarding the electoral debate of presidential candidates. As a mass media outlet targeting readers both domestically and internationally, Jakartapost.com is required to maintain neutrality in reporting on presidential debates. Therefore, the research aims to understand the attitudes and political ideology of 2024 Indonesian presidential candidates reported by Jakartapost.com. The news was analyzed using the appraisal system proposed by Martin and White (2005), categorizing attitudes into affect, judgment, and appreciation. This research utilized qualitative methods with embedded case study and Spradley’s analysis to identify cultural patterns and themes within the data. The results showed that attitudes consisted of 39.7% negative and 24.6% positive judgments, 16.4% negative and 8.2% positive appreciations, and 9.6% negative and 1.4% positive affects. The appraisal system can identify political ideologies of the three presidential candidates. Anis Baswedan and Ganjar Pranowo express conflicting attitudes towards the current government, indicating their role as opposition and socialist populism, while Prabowo Subianto aligns himself with the current government known as technocratic populism. Journalists tend to assess Prabowo more positively compared to other candidates, suggesting a bias towards supporting him in the 2024 election.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40585,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"REGISTER Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"REGISTER Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18326/register.v17i1.123-145\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REGISTER Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18326/register.v17i1.123-145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了《雅加达邮报》(Jakartapost.com)的 5 篇文章对总统候选人选举辩论的态度评价。作为一家面向国内外读者的大众媒体,Jakartapost.com 在报道总统辩论时必须保持中立。因此,本研究旨在了解 Jakartapost.com 所报道的 2024 年印尼总统候选人的态度和政治意识形态。研究采用马丁和怀特(2005 年)提出的评价体系对新闻进行分析,将态度分为情感、判断和赞赏。本研究采用了嵌入式案例研究和斯普拉德利分析法等定性方法,以确定数据中的文化模式和主题。结果显示,态度包括 39.7% 的负面判断和 24.6% 的正面判断,16.4% 的负面赞赏和 8.2% 的正面赞赏,以及 9.6% 的负面影响和 1.4% 的正面影响。评价系统可以识别三位总统候选人的政治意识形态。阿尼斯-巴斯韦丹(Anis Baswedan)和甘贾尔-普拉诺沃(Ganjar Pranowo)对现政府表达了相互矛盾的态度,表示自己是反对派和社会主义民粹主义者,而普拉博沃-苏比安托(Prabowo Subianto)则与现政府保持一致,被称为技术官僚民粹主义者。与其他候选人相比,记者对普拉博沃的评价更为积极,这表明他们倾向于在 2024 年选举中支持普拉博沃。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Attitude and Political Ideology of 2024 Indonesian Presidential Candidates Reported in Jakartapost.com
This research examines the evaluation of attitudes in 5 articles from Jakartapost.com regarding the electoral debate of presidential candidates. As a mass media outlet targeting readers both domestically and internationally, Jakartapost.com is required to maintain neutrality in reporting on presidential debates. Therefore, the research aims to understand the attitudes and political ideology of 2024 Indonesian presidential candidates reported by Jakartapost.com. The news was analyzed using the appraisal system proposed by Martin and White (2005), categorizing attitudes into affect, judgment, and appreciation. This research utilized qualitative methods with embedded case study and Spradley’s analysis to identify cultural patterns and themes within the data. The results showed that attitudes consisted of 39.7% negative and 24.6% positive judgments, 16.4% negative and 8.2% positive appreciations, and 9.6% negative and 1.4% positive affects. The appraisal system can identify political ideologies of the three presidential candidates. Anis Baswedan and Ganjar Pranowo express conflicting attitudes towards the current government, indicating their role as opposition and socialist populism, while Prabowo Subianto aligns himself with the current government known as technocratic populism. Journalists tend to assess Prabowo more positively compared to other candidates, suggesting a bias towards supporting him in the 2024 election.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
REGISTER Journal
REGISTER Journal Multiple-
自引率
4.80%
发文量
2
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊最新文献
Unraveling Gender-related differences in Compliment exchanges: the case of Hijazi Speakers Attitude and Political Ideology of 2024 Indonesian Presidential Candidates Reported in Jakartapost.com A Corpus-Based Lexical Coverage of Coursebooks in Nigeria: A Case Study A Qualitative Analysis of WhatsApp Integration on Speaking Vocabulary Development Unveiling the Lecturers’ and Students' Needs in English for Public Administration Program: Essential Vocabulary Topics, Instructional Methods, and Learning Challenges
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1