在薄弱的机构环境中蓬勃发展:与监管机构合作的战略

K. Freitas, Barbara Bechler Flynn, E. Paiva
{"title":"在薄弱的机构环境中蓬勃发展:与监管机构合作的战略","authors":"K. Freitas, Barbara Bechler Flynn, E. Paiva","doi":"10.1108/ijopm-07-2023-0544","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis paper explores how a firm that is established in an environment characterized by uncertainty can engage with weak regulative institutions by developing operational and institutional capabilities.Design/methodology/approachWe employ a multiple case study approach with seven leading multinational firms in Brazil in industries that vary in industry concentration.FindingsFirms choose among alternative strategies for engaging with regulative institutions as an ongoing process, based on their assessment of four characteristics of the uncertainty they face and their capabilities. Strategies that require a firm to exert greater effort to adapt to institutions or influence institutions have a greater potential to catalyze for developing operational capabilities. Although firms in industries with different concentrations behave similarly in individually adapting to regulative institutions, firms in decentralized industries are more likely to collaborate to influence institutions, which enables them to both access public agents through network partners and better negotiate their own interests.Practical implicationsThis research guides managers in developing institutional engagement strategies to reduce the potential consequences of institutional uncertainty in their supply chain. It also suggests types of institutional capability aligned with decentralized vs concentrated industries.Originality/valueWe extend the construct of institutional engagement strategies from the context of entrance to a new international market to an ongoing process in firms that are established in an environment characterized by weak regulative institutions. We also examine the role of industry concentration in the application of institutional engagement strategies.","PeriodicalId":273410,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Operations & Production Management","volume":"92 s1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Thriving in a weak institutional environment: strategies for engaging with regulative institutions\",\"authors\":\"K. Freitas, Barbara Bechler Flynn, E. Paiva\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/ijopm-07-2023-0544\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeThis paper explores how a firm that is established in an environment characterized by uncertainty can engage with weak regulative institutions by developing operational and institutional capabilities.Design/methodology/approachWe employ a multiple case study approach with seven leading multinational firms in Brazil in industries that vary in industry concentration.FindingsFirms choose among alternative strategies for engaging with regulative institutions as an ongoing process, based on their assessment of four characteristics of the uncertainty they face and their capabilities. Strategies that require a firm to exert greater effort to adapt to institutions or influence institutions have a greater potential to catalyze for developing operational capabilities. Although firms in industries with different concentrations behave similarly in individually adapting to regulative institutions, firms in decentralized industries are more likely to collaborate to influence institutions, which enables them to both access public agents through network partners and better negotiate their own interests.Practical implicationsThis research guides managers in developing institutional engagement strategies to reduce the potential consequences of institutional uncertainty in their supply chain. It also suggests types of institutional capability aligned with decentralized vs concentrated industries.Originality/valueWe extend the construct of institutional engagement strategies from the context of entrance to a new international market to an ongoing process in firms that are established in an environment characterized by weak regulative institutions. We also examine the role of industry concentration in the application of institutional engagement strategies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":273410,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Operations & Production Management\",\"volume\":\"92 s1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Operations & Production Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijopm-07-2023-0544\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Operations & Production Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijopm-07-2023-0544","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了在以不确定性为特征的环境中建立起来的企业如何通过发展运营能力和机构能力来与薄弱的监管机构打交道。需要企业付出更大努力来适应机构或影响机构的战略更有可能促进企业发展运营能力。虽然不同集中度行业的企业在单独适应监管机构方面表现相似,但分散型行业的企业更有可能通过合作来影响机构,这使它们既能通过网络伙伴接触公共代理人,又能更好地就自身利益进行谈判。原创性/价值我们将制度参与战略的概念从进入新的国际市场扩展到在监管制度薄弱的环境中成立的公司的持续过程。我们还研究了行业集中度在机构参与战略应用中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Thriving in a weak institutional environment: strategies for engaging with regulative institutions
PurposeThis paper explores how a firm that is established in an environment characterized by uncertainty can engage with weak regulative institutions by developing operational and institutional capabilities.Design/methodology/approachWe employ a multiple case study approach with seven leading multinational firms in Brazil in industries that vary in industry concentration.FindingsFirms choose among alternative strategies for engaging with regulative institutions as an ongoing process, based on their assessment of four characteristics of the uncertainty they face and their capabilities. Strategies that require a firm to exert greater effort to adapt to institutions or influence institutions have a greater potential to catalyze for developing operational capabilities. Although firms in industries with different concentrations behave similarly in individually adapting to regulative institutions, firms in decentralized industries are more likely to collaborate to influence institutions, which enables them to both access public agents through network partners and better negotiate their own interests.Practical implicationsThis research guides managers in developing institutional engagement strategies to reduce the potential consequences of institutional uncertainty in their supply chain. It also suggests types of institutional capability aligned with decentralized vs concentrated industries.Originality/valueWe extend the construct of institutional engagement strategies from the context of entrance to a new international market to an ongoing process in firms that are established in an environment characterized by weak regulative institutions. We also examine the role of industry concentration in the application of institutional engagement strategies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Geopolitical disruptions and supply chain structural ambidexterity Geopolitical disruptions and supply chain structural ambidexterity An experimental investigation of environmental knowledge sharing in a supply chain coopetition situation An experimental investigation of environmental knowledge sharing in a supply chain coopetition situation The influence of institutional logics on vaccine development, production and distribution in Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1