跟着钱走:全球卫生安全筹资动态分析

H. Robertson, E. Graeden, Justin Kerr, Michael Van Maele, Rebecca Katz
{"title":"跟着钱走:全球卫生安全筹资动态分析","authors":"H. Robertson, E. Graeden, Justin Kerr, Michael Van Maele, Rebecca Katz","doi":"10.1093/haschl/qxae083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Global financing for health security was dramatically impacted by COVID-19. Here, we provide an empirical analysis of how that funding changed. Using data from Global Health Security (GHS) Tracking (ghscosting.tracking.org), we analyzed disbursements of direct financial assistance for global health security from 2016 to 2022 to compare pre-pandemic funding (2016-2019) to post-pandemic (2020-2022) funding for preparedness and response during each of the seven World Health Organization (WHO)-declared public health emergencies of international concern (PHEICs) from 2009 to 2022. Over $165B was disbursed for capacity-building and preparedness activities between January 2016 and December 2022, and over $76B was provided for PHEIC response. Preparedness funding remained evenly distributed since 2016 across regions, with the African region receiving about 70% of total preparedness funding. Indeed, how capacity-building and preparedness funding is distributed has changed remarkably little since 2016, despite unprecedented changes to the funding environment – including markedly increased spending – in response to COVID-19. This suggests we now have a unique opportunity to restructure how funds are tracked for accountability and assessing return on investment moving forward.","PeriodicalId":502462,"journal":{"name":"Health Affairs Scholar","volume":"29 48","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Follow the Money: A Global Analysis of Funding Dynamics for Global Health Security\",\"authors\":\"H. Robertson, E. Graeden, Justin Kerr, Michael Van Maele, Rebecca Katz\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/haschl/qxae083\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Global financing for health security was dramatically impacted by COVID-19. Here, we provide an empirical analysis of how that funding changed. Using data from Global Health Security (GHS) Tracking (ghscosting.tracking.org), we analyzed disbursements of direct financial assistance for global health security from 2016 to 2022 to compare pre-pandemic funding (2016-2019) to post-pandemic (2020-2022) funding for preparedness and response during each of the seven World Health Organization (WHO)-declared public health emergencies of international concern (PHEICs) from 2009 to 2022. Over $165B was disbursed for capacity-building and preparedness activities between January 2016 and December 2022, and over $76B was provided for PHEIC response. Preparedness funding remained evenly distributed since 2016 across regions, with the African region receiving about 70% of total preparedness funding. Indeed, how capacity-building and preparedness funding is distributed has changed remarkably little since 2016, despite unprecedented changes to the funding environment – including markedly increased spending – in response to COVID-19. This suggests we now have a unique opportunity to restructure how funds are tracked for accountability and assessing return on investment moving forward.\",\"PeriodicalId\":502462,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Affairs Scholar\",\"volume\":\"29 48\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Affairs Scholar\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxae083\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Affairs Scholar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxae083","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

COVID-19 对全球卫生安全融资产生了巨大影响。在此,我们对资金的变化情况进行了实证分析。利用全球卫生安全(GHS)追踪系统(ghscosting.tracking.org)的数据,我们分析了 2016 年至 2022 年全球卫生安全直接财政援助的支付情况,比较了 2009 年至 2022 年世界卫生组织(WHO)宣布的七次国际关注的突发公共卫生事件(PHEIC)中每次疫情发生前(2016-2019 年)和疫情发生后(2020-2022 年)的备灾和响应资金。在 2016 年 1 月至 2022 年 12 月期间,为能力建设和备灾活动支付了超过 1,650 亿美元,为应对 PHEIC 提供了超过 760 亿美元。自 2016 年以来,备灾资金在各地区的分布依然均匀,非洲地区获得了备灾资金总额的约 70%。事实上,自 2016 年以来,能力建设和备灾资金的分配方式变化极小,尽管资金环境发生了前所未有的变化--包括因 COVID-19 而显著增加的支出。这表明,我们现在有一个独特的机会来调整资金的追踪方式,以促进问责制和评估投资回报。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Follow the Money: A Global Analysis of Funding Dynamics for Global Health Security
Global financing for health security was dramatically impacted by COVID-19. Here, we provide an empirical analysis of how that funding changed. Using data from Global Health Security (GHS) Tracking (ghscosting.tracking.org), we analyzed disbursements of direct financial assistance for global health security from 2016 to 2022 to compare pre-pandemic funding (2016-2019) to post-pandemic (2020-2022) funding for preparedness and response during each of the seven World Health Organization (WHO)-declared public health emergencies of international concern (PHEICs) from 2009 to 2022. Over $165B was disbursed for capacity-building and preparedness activities between January 2016 and December 2022, and over $76B was provided for PHEIC response. Preparedness funding remained evenly distributed since 2016 across regions, with the African region receiving about 70% of total preparedness funding. Indeed, how capacity-building and preparedness funding is distributed has changed remarkably little since 2016, despite unprecedented changes to the funding environment – including markedly increased spending – in response to COVID-19. This suggests we now have a unique opportunity to restructure how funds are tracked for accountability and assessing return on investment moving forward.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Geographic Variation in Shortfalls of Dementia Specialists in the U.S. Biosimilar underutilization alone does not foretell a broken biologics market Regional Variation in Length of Stay for Stroke Inpatient Rehabilitation in Traditional Medicare and Medicare Advantage Who Participates in Value-Based Care Models? Physician Characteristics and Implications for Value-based Care Medicare Advantage Enrollment and Outcomes of Post-Acute Nursing Home Care Among Patients with Dementia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1