急性缺血性脑卒中治疗中与阿替普酶和替奈替普酶相关的错误和风险缓解策略:52 家医院的事件报告研究

Myungsun Ro, Matthew A. Taylor, Rebecca Jones
{"title":"急性缺血性脑卒中治疗中与阿替普酶和替奈替普酶相关的错误和风险缓解策略:52 家医院的事件报告研究","authors":"Myungsun Ro, Matthew A. Taylor, Rebecca Jones","doi":"10.33940/001c.117322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Alteplase and tenecteplase are thrombolytic agents used to treat patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Despite the convenient bolus dosing of tenecteplase, its off-label use for AIS creates new patient safety challenges that are understudied. Methods: The study was conducted in two parts. In Part I, we queried the Pennsylvania Patient Safety Reporting System (PA-PSRS) database for event reports involving alteplase and tenecteplase that were submitted between 2017 and 2022. Based on results from Part I, in Part II we narrowed the query to reports submitted in 2021–2022 and applied inclusion criteria to identify reports that described a medication error involving the use of alteplase or tenecteplase to treat AIS. In Part II, all reports were reviewed and coded for stages of the medication-use process, associated factors, and event type. Results: Part I results (N=858) showed a decrease in reports of alteplase events and an increase in reports of tenecteplase events. In Part II (N=92), 52% of reports involved alteplase and 48% involved tenecteplase. Wrong dose was the most frequently coded event type for both medications at a combined 48%. Several tenecteplase-related events were attributed to unfamiliarity with the medication, confusion between indications, and incorrect use of the electronic health record (EHR) or failure to use the EHR, whereas many errors unique to alteplase occurred during the multistep calculation, preparation, and administration processes. Conclusions: Safety events involving alteplase and tenecteplase in the treatment of AIS are diverse. We present a list of potential strategies to prevent and mitigate errors involving these high-alert medications and encourage providers to adopt those that are meaningful to their workflow and practice setting.","PeriodicalId":509285,"journal":{"name":"PATIENT SAFETY","volume":"11 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Alteplase- and Tenecteplase-Related Errors and Risk Mitigation Strategies in the Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Study of Event Reports From 52 Hospitals\",\"authors\":\"Myungsun Ro, Matthew A. Taylor, Rebecca Jones\",\"doi\":\"10.33940/001c.117322\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Alteplase and tenecteplase are thrombolytic agents used to treat patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Despite the convenient bolus dosing of tenecteplase, its off-label use for AIS creates new patient safety challenges that are understudied. Methods: The study was conducted in two parts. In Part I, we queried the Pennsylvania Patient Safety Reporting System (PA-PSRS) database for event reports involving alteplase and tenecteplase that were submitted between 2017 and 2022. Based on results from Part I, in Part II we narrowed the query to reports submitted in 2021–2022 and applied inclusion criteria to identify reports that described a medication error involving the use of alteplase or tenecteplase to treat AIS. In Part II, all reports were reviewed and coded for stages of the medication-use process, associated factors, and event type. Results: Part I results (N=858) showed a decrease in reports of alteplase events and an increase in reports of tenecteplase events. In Part II (N=92), 52% of reports involved alteplase and 48% involved tenecteplase. Wrong dose was the most frequently coded event type for both medications at a combined 48%. Several tenecteplase-related events were attributed to unfamiliarity with the medication, confusion between indications, and incorrect use of the electronic health record (EHR) or failure to use the EHR, whereas many errors unique to alteplase occurred during the multistep calculation, preparation, and administration processes. Conclusions: Safety events involving alteplase and tenecteplase in the treatment of AIS are diverse. We present a list of potential strategies to prevent and mitigate errors involving these high-alert medications and encourage providers to adopt those that are meaningful to their workflow and practice setting.\",\"PeriodicalId\":509285,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PATIENT SAFETY\",\"volume\":\"11 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PATIENT SAFETY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33940/001c.117322\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PATIENT SAFETY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33940/001c.117322","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:阿替普酶和替奈普酶是用于治疗急性缺血性卒中(AIS)患者的溶栓药物。尽管替奈普酶的栓剂给药非常方便,但其在标签外用于 AIS 会给患者安全带来新的挑战,而这些挑战尚未得到充分研究。研究方法研究分两部分进行。在第一部分中,我们查询了宾夕法尼亚州患者安全报告系统(PA-PSRS)数据库中 2017 年至 2022 年期间提交的涉及阿替普酶和替奈普酶的事件报告。根据第一部分的结果,在第二部分中,我们将查询范围缩小至 2021-2022 年提交的报告,并应用纳入标准来识别描述了使用阿替普酶或替奈普酶治疗 AIS 的用药错误的报告。在第二部分中,我们对所有报告进行了审查,并对用药过程的各个阶段、相关因素和事件类型进行了编码。结果:第一部分结果(N=858)显示,阿替普酶事件报告有所减少,而替奈普酶事件报告有所增加。在第二部分(N=92)中,52%的报告涉及阿替普酶,48%涉及替奈普酶。剂量错误是两种药物最常见的编码事件类型,合计占 48%。一些与替奈普酶相关的事件归因于不熟悉药物、混淆适应症、不正确使用电子病历 (EHR) 或未使用 EHR,而许多阿替普酶特有的错误发生在多步计算、准备和给药过程中。结论:涉及阿替普酶和替奈普酶治疗 AIS 的安全事件多种多样。我们列出了预防和减少涉及这些高警戒药物的错误的潜在策略清单,并鼓励医疗服务提供者采用对其工作流程和实践环境有意义的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Alteplase- and Tenecteplase-Related Errors and Risk Mitigation Strategies in the Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Study of Event Reports From 52 Hospitals
Background: Alteplase and tenecteplase are thrombolytic agents used to treat patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Despite the convenient bolus dosing of tenecteplase, its off-label use for AIS creates new patient safety challenges that are understudied. Methods: The study was conducted in two parts. In Part I, we queried the Pennsylvania Patient Safety Reporting System (PA-PSRS) database for event reports involving alteplase and tenecteplase that were submitted between 2017 and 2022. Based on results from Part I, in Part II we narrowed the query to reports submitted in 2021–2022 and applied inclusion criteria to identify reports that described a medication error involving the use of alteplase or tenecteplase to treat AIS. In Part II, all reports were reviewed and coded for stages of the medication-use process, associated factors, and event type. Results: Part I results (N=858) showed a decrease in reports of alteplase events and an increase in reports of tenecteplase events. In Part II (N=92), 52% of reports involved alteplase and 48% involved tenecteplase. Wrong dose was the most frequently coded event type for both medications at a combined 48%. Several tenecteplase-related events were attributed to unfamiliarity with the medication, confusion between indications, and incorrect use of the electronic health record (EHR) or failure to use the EHR, whereas many errors unique to alteplase occurred during the multistep calculation, preparation, and administration processes. Conclusions: Safety events involving alteplase and tenecteplase in the treatment of AIS are diverse. We present a list of potential strategies to prevent and mitigate errors involving these high-alert medications and encourage providers to adopt those that are meaningful to their workflow and practice setting.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Implementing a Compliance Monitoring Process to Promote Chlorhexidine Gluconate Bathing and Hand Hygiene: An Initiative to Decrease Central Line–Associated Bloodstream Infections Unmasking the Contributing Factors to Oxygen Disruption Events in the Inpatient Environment and Emergency Department Free Text as Part of Electronic Health Record Orders: Context or Concern? Technology Failures Analysis of an Academic Medical Center’s Corrective Action Plan in Response to Fatal Medication Error Using the Institute for Safe Medication Practices’ Hierarchy of Effectiveness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1