{"title":"诱导极化和水力层析成像数据的联合反演,用于水力传导成像","authors":"Lukas Römhild, G. Fiandaca, Peter Bayer","doi":"10.1093/gji/ggae197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n For accurate modeling of groundwater flow and transport processes within an aquifer, precise knowledge about hydraulic conductivity K and its small-scale heterogeneities is fundamental. Methods based on pumping tests, such as hydraulic tomography (HT), allow for retrieving reliable K-estimates, but are limited in their ability to image structural features with high resolution, since the data from time-consuming hydraulic tests are commonly sparse. In contrast, geophysical methods like induced polarization (IP) can potentially yield structural images of much higher resolution, but depend on empirical petrophysical laws that may introduce significant uncertainties to the K-estimation. Therefore, this paper presents a joint inversion procedure for both HT and IP data, which allows for combining the complementary abilities of both methods. Within this approach, a travel time inversion is applied to the HT data, while the IP inversion is based on a full-decay time-domain forward response, as well as a re-parameterization of the Cole-Cole model to invert for K directly. The joint inversion is tested on a synthetic model mimicking horizontally layered sediments, and the results are compared with the individual HT and IP inversions. It is shown that jointly inverting both data sets consistently improves the results by combining the complementary sensitivities of the two methods, and that the inversion is more robust against changes in the experimental setups. Furthermore, we illustrate how a joint inversion approach can correct biases within the petrophysical laws by including reliable K-information from hydraulic tests and still preserving the high-resolution structural information from IP. The different inversion results are compared based on the structural similarity index (SSIM), which underlines the robustness of the joint inversion compared to using the data individually. Hence, the combined application of HT and IP within field surveys and a subsequent joint inversion of both data sets may improve our understanding of hydraulically relevant subsurface structures, and thus the reliability of groundwater modeling results.","PeriodicalId":502458,"journal":{"name":"Geophysical Journal International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Joint inversion of induced polarization and hydraulic tomography data for hydraulic conductivity imaging\",\"authors\":\"Lukas Römhild, G. Fiandaca, Peter Bayer\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/gji/ggae197\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n For accurate modeling of groundwater flow and transport processes within an aquifer, precise knowledge about hydraulic conductivity K and its small-scale heterogeneities is fundamental. Methods based on pumping tests, such as hydraulic tomography (HT), allow for retrieving reliable K-estimates, but are limited in their ability to image structural features with high resolution, since the data from time-consuming hydraulic tests are commonly sparse. In contrast, geophysical methods like induced polarization (IP) can potentially yield structural images of much higher resolution, but depend on empirical petrophysical laws that may introduce significant uncertainties to the K-estimation. Therefore, this paper presents a joint inversion procedure for both HT and IP data, which allows for combining the complementary abilities of both methods. Within this approach, a travel time inversion is applied to the HT data, while the IP inversion is based on a full-decay time-domain forward response, as well as a re-parameterization of the Cole-Cole model to invert for K directly. The joint inversion is tested on a synthetic model mimicking horizontally layered sediments, and the results are compared with the individual HT and IP inversions. It is shown that jointly inverting both data sets consistently improves the results by combining the complementary sensitivities of the two methods, and that the inversion is more robust against changes in the experimental setups. Furthermore, we illustrate how a joint inversion approach can correct biases within the petrophysical laws by including reliable K-information from hydraulic tests and still preserving the high-resolution structural information from IP. The different inversion results are compared based on the structural similarity index (SSIM), which underlines the robustness of the joint inversion compared to using the data individually. Hence, the combined application of HT and IP within field surveys and a subsequent joint inversion of both data sets may improve our understanding of hydraulically relevant subsurface structures, and thus the reliability of groundwater modeling results.\",\"PeriodicalId\":502458,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geophysical Journal International\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geophysical Journal International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggae197\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geophysical Journal International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggae197","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
要对含水层内的地下水流动和传输过程进行精确建模,就必须精确了解水力传导率 K 及其小尺度异质性。基于抽水试验的方法,如水力层析成像法(HT),可以获得可靠的 K 估计值,但由于耗时的水力试验数据通常比较稀少,因此在对结构特征进行高分辨率成像方面能力有限。相比之下,诱导极化(IP)等地球物理方法有可能生成分辨率更高的构造图像,但这种方法依赖于经验岩石物理定律,可能会给 K 值估算带来很大的不确定性。因此,本文提出了 HT 和 IP 数据的联合反演程序,将两种方法的互补能力结合起来。在这种方法中,旅行时间反演应用于 HT 数据,而 IP 反演则基于全衰减时域前向响应,以及对 Cole-Cole 模型的重新参数化,以直接反演 K。联合反演在模拟水平分层沉积物的合成模型上进行了测试,并将结果与单独的 HT 和 IP 反演进行了比较。结果表明,通过结合两种方法的互补敏感性,对两个数据集进行联合反演可以持续改进结果,而且反演对实验设置的变化具有更强的鲁棒性。此外,我们还说明了联合反演方法如何通过纳入水力测试中可靠的 K 信息,同时保留 IP 中的高分辨率结构信息,来纠正岩石物理定律中的偏差。根据结构相似性指数(SSIM)对不同的反演结果进行了比较,结果表明,与单独使用数据相比,联合反演具有稳健性。因此,在野外勘测中结合应用 HT 和 IP,并随后对两套数据进行联合反演,可以提高我们对与水文相关的地下结构的理解,从而提高地下水建模结果的可靠性。
Joint inversion of induced polarization and hydraulic tomography data for hydraulic conductivity imaging
For accurate modeling of groundwater flow and transport processes within an aquifer, precise knowledge about hydraulic conductivity K and its small-scale heterogeneities is fundamental. Methods based on pumping tests, such as hydraulic tomography (HT), allow for retrieving reliable K-estimates, but are limited in their ability to image structural features with high resolution, since the data from time-consuming hydraulic tests are commonly sparse. In contrast, geophysical methods like induced polarization (IP) can potentially yield structural images of much higher resolution, but depend on empirical petrophysical laws that may introduce significant uncertainties to the K-estimation. Therefore, this paper presents a joint inversion procedure for both HT and IP data, which allows for combining the complementary abilities of both methods. Within this approach, a travel time inversion is applied to the HT data, while the IP inversion is based on a full-decay time-domain forward response, as well as a re-parameterization of the Cole-Cole model to invert for K directly. The joint inversion is tested on a synthetic model mimicking horizontally layered sediments, and the results are compared with the individual HT and IP inversions. It is shown that jointly inverting both data sets consistently improves the results by combining the complementary sensitivities of the two methods, and that the inversion is more robust against changes in the experimental setups. Furthermore, we illustrate how a joint inversion approach can correct biases within the petrophysical laws by including reliable K-information from hydraulic tests and still preserving the high-resolution structural information from IP. The different inversion results are compared based on the structural similarity index (SSIM), which underlines the robustness of the joint inversion compared to using the data individually. Hence, the combined application of HT and IP within field surveys and a subsequent joint inversion of both data sets may improve our understanding of hydraulically relevant subsurface structures, and thus the reliability of groundwater modeling results.