人们如何讲述自己的流产经历?定性文献的系统回顾

IF 1.4 3区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare Pub Date : 2024-06-12 DOI:10.1016/j.srhc.2024.100997
Emma L.G. Wallis , Jennifer Heath , Amanda Spong
{"title":"人们如何讲述自己的流产经历?定性文献的系统回顾","authors":"Emma L.G. Wallis ,&nbsp;Jennifer Heath ,&nbsp;Amanda Spong","doi":"10.1016/j.srhc.2024.100997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Literature surrounding miscarriage is broad in scope, yet narrative constructions following miscarriage are significantly under-researched. Few studies have sought to understand sense-making processes following miscarriage, including how and why people story their experience. Consequently, the complexities and nuances of these processes have not been adequately explored. This review aimed to gain insight into what is already known about how people story their experience of miscarriage, as well as research gaps and limitations.</p><p>A systematic literature review of qualitative literature was conducted across four databases to identify relevant research related to miscarriage narratives and sense-making. Eligibility criteria was applied to a staged screening process to identify the highest quality, peer-reviewed research. Ten studies were included in the review and presented as a narrative synthesis. The literature was divided into five collective themes: women’s perspectives, male partner’s perspectives, couples’ perspectives, healthcare professional’s perspectives, and cultural perspectives.</p><p>The literature review summarises existing knowledge about narrative processes in relation to miscarriage, as well as highlighting research gaps, clinical implications, and directions for future research. When working with those who have experienced involuntary child loss and infertility, there is a need for professionals to have appropriate training to support the provision of compassionate, individualised care and decision-making. The role of language requires consideration as there is a need to address over-medicalised systems of knowledge, and it is important that there is understanding regarding the need for expression, and the various ways that individuals might express their feelings and loss.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54199,"journal":{"name":"Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877575624000521/pdfft?md5=33c8e5d8f42545f2c13b72ba928750eb&pid=1-s2.0-S1877575624000521-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How do people story their experience of miscarriage? A systematic review of qualitative literature\",\"authors\":\"Emma L.G. Wallis ,&nbsp;Jennifer Heath ,&nbsp;Amanda Spong\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.srhc.2024.100997\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Literature surrounding miscarriage is broad in scope, yet narrative constructions following miscarriage are significantly under-researched. Few studies have sought to understand sense-making processes following miscarriage, including how and why people story their experience. Consequently, the complexities and nuances of these processes have not been adequately explored. This review aimed to gain insight into what is already known about how people story their experience of miscarriage, as well as research gaps and limitations.</p><p>A systematic literature review of qualitative literature was conducted across four databases to identify relevant research related to miscarriage narratives and sense-making. Eligibility criteria was applied to a staged screening process to identify the highest quality, peer-reviewed research. Ten studies were included in the review and presented as a narrative synthesis. The literature was divided into five collective themes: women’s perspectives, male partner’s perspectives, couples’ perspectives, healthcare professional’s perspectives, and cultural perspectives.</p><p>The literature review summarises existing knowledge about narrative processes in relation to miscarriage, as well as highlighting research gaps, clinical implications, and directions for future research. When working with those who have experienced involuntary child loss and infertility, there is a need for professionals to have appropriate training to support the provision of compassionate, individualised care and decision-making. The role of language requires consideration as there is a need to address over-medicalised systems of knowledge, and it is important that there is understanding regarding the need for expression, and the various ways that individuals might express their feelings and loss.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54199,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877575624000521/pdfft?md5=33c8e5d8f42545f2c13b72ba928750eb&pid=1-s2.0-S1877575624000521-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877575624000521\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877575624000521","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有关流产的文献范围很广,但对流产后的叙事建构研究却严重不足。很少有研究试图了解流产后的意义建构过程,包括人们如何以及为何讲述自己的经历。因此,这些过程的复杂性和细微差别尚未得到充分探讨。本综述旨在深入了解人们是如何讲述其流产经历的,以及研究的不足和局限性。资格标准适用于分阶段筛选过程,以确定最高质量的同行评审研究。十项研究被纳入综述,并以叙述性综述的形式呈现。文献综述总结了有关流产叙事过程的现有知识,并强调了研究空白、临床影响和未来研究方向。在与经历过非自愿丧子和不孕症的人合作时,专业人员需要接受适当的培训,以支持提供富有同情心的个性化护理和决策。语言的作用需要考虑,因为需要解决过度医疗化的知识体系,重要的是要理解表达的需要,以及个人可能表达其情感和失落的各种方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How do people story their experience of miscarriage? A systematic review of qualitative literature

Literature surrounding miscarriage is broad in scope, yet narrative constructions following miscarriage are significantly under-researched. Few studies have sought to understand sense-making processes following miscarriage, including how and why people story their experience. Consequently, the complexities and nuances of these processes have not been adequately explored. This review aimed to gain insight into what is already known about how people story their experience of miscarriage, as well as research gaps and limitations.

A systematic literature review of qualitative literature was conducted across four databases to identify relevant research related to miscarriage narratives and sense-making. Eligibility criteria was applied to a staged screening process to identify the highest quality, peer-reviewed research. Ten studies were included in the review and presented as a narrative synthesis. The literature was divided into five collective themes: women’s perspectives, male partner’s perspectives, couples’ perspectives, healthcare professional’s perspectives, and cultural perspectives.

The literature review summarises existing knowledge about narrative processes in relation to miscarriage, as well as highlighting research gaps, clinical implications, and directions for future research. When working with those who have experienced involuntary child loss and infertility, there is a need for professionals to have appropriate training to support the provision of compassionate, individualised care and decision-making. The role of language requires consideration as there is a need to address over-medicalised systems of knowledge, and it is important that there is understanding regarding the need for expression, and the various ways that individuals might express their feelings and loss.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare
Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
73
审稿时长
45 days
期刊最新文献
Investigating the associations between early labour onset symptoms and self-diagnosed labour onset in a cohort study of primiparas Overuse of intrapartum CTG monitoring in low-risk women in Norway Editorial Board The conclusion of CTG overuse is not justified Hysterectomy and medical financial hardship among U.S. women
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1