腋窝淋巴结乳腺癌转移的术中诊断:细胞涂片与冰冻切片

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Clinical breast cancer Pub Date : 2024-06-07 DOI:10.1016/j.clbc.2024.06.002
{"title":"腋窝淋巴结乳腺癌转移的术中诊断:细胞涂片与冰冻切片","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.clbc.2024.06.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Intraoperative evaluation of axillary lymph nodes is sometimes required to determine the extent of surgery. In this study, we wished to assess the reliability of cytologic smear (CS) in determining lymph node involvement with tumor. Theoretically, CS provides more substance for examination than touch-imprint cytology and is faster to perform than frozen section (FS). We hypothesized that CS sensitivity for tumor cell detection in the lymph nodes would be similar to FS, at least 0.90.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This was a retrospective observational study at the Rambam Health Care Campus (January, 2013-June, 2020). Lymph nodes underwent intraoperative evaluation using either CS or FS, based on the availability of a cytologist at the time of the examination. Both intraoperative evaluations were compared to the final pathology following fixation with formalin.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Eighty-eight patients undergoing intraoperative analysis were analyzed (51 CS, 37 FS). False-negative tests were recorded in only 1 patient evaluated by each of the 2 methods. This resulted in sensitivity 0.91 (95%CI 0.59, 1.00) for CS and 0.88 (95%CI 0.47, 1.00) for FS, specificity 1.00 (95%CI 0.91, 1.00) for CS and 1.00 (95%CI 0.88, 1.00) for FS, positive predictive value 1.00 (95%CI 0.69, 1.00) for CS and 1.00 (95%CI 0.59, 1.00) for FS, and negative predictive value 0.98 (95%CI 0.87, 1.00) for CS and 0.97 (95%CI 0.83, 1.00) for FS.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The sensitivity of the CS in this study is comparable to that of FS and due to shorter analysis time required is the preferred method at our institution.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10197,"journal":{"name":"Clinical breast cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intraoperative diagnosis of breast cancer metastasis in axillary lymph nodes: Cytological Smear vs. Frozen Section\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clbc.2024.06.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Intraoperative evaluation of axillary lymph nodes is sometimes required to determine the extent of surgery. In this study, we wished to assess the reliability of cytologic smear (CS) in determining lymph node involvement with tumor. Theoretically, CS provides more substance for examination than touch-imprint cytology and is faster to perform than frozen section (FS). We hypothesized that CS sensitivity for tumor cell detection in the lymph nodes would be similar to FS, at least 0.90.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This was a retrospective observational study at the Rambam Health Care Campus (January, 2013-June, 2020). Lymph nodes underwent intraoperative evaluation using either CS or FS, based on the availability of a cytologist at the time of the examination. Both intraoperative evaluations were compared to the final pathology following fixation with formalin.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Eighty-eight patients undergoing intraoperative analysis were analyzed (51 CS, 37 FS). False-negative tests were recorded in only 1 patient evaluated by each of the 2 methods. This resulted in sensitivity 0.91 (95%CI 0.59, 1.00) for CS and 0.88 (95%CI 0.47, 1.00) for FS, specificity 1.00 (95%CI 0.91, 1.00) for CS and 1.00 (95%CI 0.88, 1.00) for FS, positive predictive value 1.00 (95%CI 0.69, 1.00) for CS and 1.00 (95%CI 0.59, 1.00) for FS, and negative predictive value 0.98 (95%CI 0.87, 1.00) for CS and 0.97 (95%CI 0.83, 1.00) for FS.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The sensitivity of the CS in this study is comparable to that of FS and due to shorter analysis time required is the preferred method at our institution.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10197,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical breast cancer\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical breast cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1526820924001502\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical breast cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1526820924001502","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景有时需要对腋窝淋巴结进行术前评估,以确定手术范围。在本研究中,我们希望评估细胞学涂片(CS)在确定淋巴结是否受肿瘤累及方面的可靠性。从理论上讲,细胞学涂片比触摸印迹细胞学检查提供了更多的检查内容,而且比冰冻切片(FS)更快。我们假设 CS 对淋巴结中肿瘤细胞检测的灵敏度与 FS 相似,至少为 0.90。根据检查时是否有细胞学专家,采用 CS 或 FS 对淋巴结进行术中评估。将两种术中评估结果与福尔马林固定后的最终病理结果进行比较。结果分析了接受术中分析的 88 例患者(51 例 CS,37 例 FS)。在两种方法的每种评估中,仅有一名患者出现假阴性结果。因此,CS 的灵敏度为 0.91(95%CI 0.59,1.00),FS 的灵敏度为 0.88(95%CI 0.47,1.00);CS 的特异性为 1.00(95%CI 0.91,1.00),FS 的特异性为 1.00(95%CI 0.88,1.00);CS 的阳性预测值为 1.00(95%CI 0.69,1.00),FS 的阳性预测值为 1.00(95%CI 0.59,1.结论在本研究中,CS 的灵敏度与 FS 相当,由于所需的分析时间较短,因此是本机构的首选方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Intraoperative diagnosis of breast cancer metastasis in axillary lymph nodes: Cytological Smear vs. Frozen Section

Background

Intraoperative evaluation of axillary lymph nodes is sometimes required to determine the extent of surgery. In this study, we wished to assess the reliability of cytologic smear (CS) in determining lymph node involvement with tumor. Theoretically, CS provides more substance for examination than touch-imprint cytology and is faster to perform than frozen section (FS). We hypothesized that CS sensitivity for tumor cell detection in the lymph nodes would be similar to FS, at least 0.90.

Methods

This was a retrospective observational study at the Rambam Health Care Campus (January, 2013-June, 2020). Lymph nodes underwent intraoperative evaluation using either CS or FS, based on the availability of a cytologist at the time of the examination. Both intraoperative evaluations were compared to the final pathology following fixation with formalin.

Results

Eighty-eight patients undergoing intraoperative analysis were analyzed (51 CS, 37 FS). False-negative tests were recorded in only 1 patient evaluated by each of the 2 methods. This resulted in sensitivity 0.91 (95%CI 0.59, 1.00) for CS and 0.88 (95%CI 0.47, 1.00) for FS, specificity 1.00 (95%CI 0.91, 1.00) for CS and 1.00 (95%CI 0.88, 1.00) for FS, positive predictive value 1.00 (95%CI 0.69, 1.00) for CS and 1.00 (95%CI 0.59, 1.00) for FS, and negative predictive value 0.98 (95%CI 0.87, 1.00) for CS and 0.97 (95%CI 0.83, 1.00) for FS.

Conclusions

The sensitivity of the CS in this study is comparable to that of FS and due to shorter analysis time required is the preferred method at our institution.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical breast cancer
Clinical breast cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
174
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Breast Cancer is a peer-reviewed bimonthly journal that publishes original articles describing various aspects of clinical and translational research of breast cancer. Clinical Breast Cancer is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of breast cancer. The main emphasis is on recent scientific developments in all areas related to breast cancer. Specific areas of interest include clinical research reports from various therapeutic modalities, cancer genetics, drug sensitivity and resistance, novel imaging, tumor genomics, biomarkers, and chemoprevention strategies.
期刊最新文献
Clinicopathologic Features and Digital Imaging Analysis of HER2 Protein in Breast Carcinomas With Different HER2 Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization Patterns. USP4/CARM1 Axis Promotes the Malignant Transformation of Breast Cancer Cells by Upregulating SLC7A11 Expression. Disparities in Hereditary Genetic Testing in Patients with Triple Negative Breast Cancer. The Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index is a Predictor of Chemotherapy Sensitivity and Disease-Free Survival in Patients With Hormone Receptor-Positive Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Breast Cancer. Comparison of [18F] FDG PET/CT and [18F]FDG PET/MRI in the Detection of Distant Metastases in Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1