核磁共振测量运动平均偶极耦合的方法比较

IF 2 3区 化学 Q3 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS Journal of magnetic resonance Pub Date : 2024-06-09 DOI:10.1016/j.jmr.2024.107710
Scott A. Southern , Frédéric A. Perras
{"title":"核磁共振测量运动平均偶极耦合的方法比较","authors":"Scott A. Southern ,&nbsp;Frédéric A. Perras","doi":"10.1016/j.jmr.2024.107710","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Motionally averaged dipolar couplings are an important tool for understanding the complex dynamics of catalysts, polymers, and biomolecules. While there is a plethora of solid-state NMR pulse sequences available for their measurement, in can be difficult to gauge the methods’ strengths and weaknesses. In particular, there has not been a comprehensive comparison of their performance in natural abundance samples, where <sup>1</sup>H homonuclear dipolar couplings are important and the use of large MAS rotors may be required for sensitivity reasons. In this work, we directly compared some of the more common methods for measuring C–H dipolar couplings in natural abundance samples using L-alanine (L-Ala) and the <em>N</em>-formyl-L-methionyl-L-leucyl-L-phenylalanine (fMLF) tripeptide as model systems. We evaluated their performance in terms of accuracy, resolution, sensitivity, and ease of implementation. We found that, despite the presence of <sup>1</sup>H homonuclear dipolar interactions, all methods, with the exception of REDOR, were able to yield the reasonable dipolar coupling strengths for both mobile and static moieties. Of these methods, PDLF provides the most convenient workflow and precision at the expense of low sensitivity. In low-sensitivity cases, MAS-PISEMA and DIPSHIFT appear to be the better options.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16267,"journal":{"name":"Journal of magnetic resonance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of methods for the NMR measurement of motionally averaged dipolar couplings\",\"authors\":\"Scott A. Southern ,&nbsp;Frédéric A. Perras\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jmr.2024.107710\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Motionally averaged dipolar couplings are an important tool for understanding the complex dynamics of catalysts, polymers, and biomolecules. While there is a plethora of solid-state NMR pulse sequences available for their measurement, in can be difficult to gauge the methods’ strengths and weaknesses. In particular, there has not been a comprehensive comparison of their performance in natural abundance samples, where <sup>1</sup>H homonuclear dipolar couplings are important and the use of large MAS rotors may be required for sensitivity reasons. In this work, we directly compared some of the more common methods for measuring C–H dipolar couplings in natural abundance samples using L-alanine (L-Ala) and the <em>N</em>-formyl-L-methionyl-L-leucyl-L-phenylalanine (fMLF) tripeptide as model systems. We evaluated their performance in terms of accuracy, resolution, sensitivity, and ease of implementation. We found that, despite the presence of <sup>1</sup>H homonuclear dipolar interactions, all methods, with the exception of REDOR, were able to yield the reasonable dipolar coupling strengths for both mobile and static moieties. Of these methods, PDLF provides the most convenient workflow and precision at the expense of low sensitivity. In low-sensitivity cases, MAS-PISEMA and DIPSHIFT appear to be the better options.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16267,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of magnetic resonance\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of magnetic resonance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090780724000946\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of magnetic resonance","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090780724000946","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

运动平均偶极耦合是了解催化剂、聚合物和生物分子复杂动态的重要工具。虽然有大量固态 NMR 脉冲序列可用于测量它们,但要衡量这些方法的优缺点却很困难。特别是在天然丰度样品中,1H 同核偶极耦合非常重要,而且出于灵敏度的考虑,可能需要使用大型 MAS 转子,因此还没有对这些方法的性能进行过全面比较。在这项工作中,我们以 L-丙氨酸(L-Ala)和 N-甲酰基-L-蛋氨酰-L-亮氨酰-L-苯丙氨酸(fMLF)三肽为模型系统,直接比较了在天然丰度样品中测量 C-H 偶极耦合的一些常用方法。我们从准确性、分辨率、灵敏度和易用性等方面对它们的性能进行了评估。我们发现,尽管存在 1H 同核偶极相互作用,但除 REDOR 外,所有方法都能得出流动和静态分子的合理偶极耦合强度。在这些方法中,PDLF 的工作流程最便捷,精确度最高,但灵敏度较低。在低灵敏度情况下,MAS-PISEMA 和 DIPSHIFT 似乎是更好的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of methods for the NMR measurement of motionally averaged dipolar couplings

Motionally averaged dipolar couplings are an important tool for understanding the complex dynamics of catalysts, polymers, and biomolecules. While there is a plethora of solid-state NMR pulse sequences available for their measurement, in can be difficult to gauge the methods’ strengths and weaknesses. In particular, there has not been a comprehensive comparison of their performance in natural abundance samples, where 1H homonuclear dipolar couplings are important and the use of large MAS rotors may be required for sensitivity reasons. In this work, we directly compared some of the more common methods for measuring C–H dipolar couplings in natural abundance samples using L-alanine (L-Ala) and the N-formyl-L-methionyl-L-leucyl-L-phenylalanine (fMLF) tripeptide as model systems. We evaluated their performance in terms of accuracy, resolution, sensitivity, and ease of implementation. We found that, despite the presence of 1H homonuclear dipolar interactions, all methods, with the exception of REDOR, were able to yield the reasonable dipolar coupling strengths for both mobile and static moieties. Of these methods, PDLF provides the most convenient workflow and precision at the expense of low sensitivity. In low-sensitivity cases, MAS-PISEMA and DIPSHIFT appear to be the better options.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
13.60%
发文量
150
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Magnetic Resonance presents original technical and scientific papers in all aspects of magnetic resonance, including nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR) of solids and liquids, electron spin/paramagnetic resonance (EPR), in vivo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and spectroscopy (MRS), nuclear quadrupole resonance (NQR) and magnetic resonance phenomena at nearly zero fields or in combination with optics. The Journal''s main aims include deepening the physical principles underlying all these spectroscopies, publishing significant theoretical and experimental results leading to spectral and spatial progress in these areas, and opening new MR-based applications in chemistry, biology and medicine. The Journal also seeks descriptions of novel apparatuses, new experimental protocols, and new procedures of data analysis and interpretation - including computational and quantum-mechanical methods - capable of advancing MR spectroscopy and imaging.
期刊最新文献
Implementing a two-stage, shim field-calibrated superconducting shimming method on a 7 T cryogen-free small animal MRI magnet Selective enhancement of 1H signal from water and oil in porous media at low field with Overhauser DNP Chemical shift prediction in 13C NMR spectroscopy using ensembles of message passing neural networks (MPNNs) Neural net analysis of NMR spectra from strongly-coupled spin systems An array of paired folded-end dipoles for whole-brain imaging at 9.4 T
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1