下消化道吻合口疑似渗漏时的注意事项

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Best Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.bpg.2024.101925
{"title":"下消化道吻合口疑似渗漏时的注意事项","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.bpg.2024.101925","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Colorectal anastomotic leakage (CAL) remains a feared complication after colorectal surgery and requires prompt detection and proper treatment. With the upswing of fast-track recovery programs in recent years this challenge has increased, as clinical features may only arise after discharge. Therefore, identification of the best diagnostic tools is of utmost importance, also since early treatment is associated with high success rates. Diagnostic tools range from general screening tools to invasive procedures to assess the severity of the leak. Laboratory tests, in particular the inflammation biomarkers C-reactive protein and procalcitonin, have a significant role in the detection of CAL after colorectal surgery. As these biomarkers are unspecific for CAL, additional imaging should be performed when blood levels are elevated. The golden standard for the detection of AL after colonic resections is a computed tomography (CT-scan). If tolerated, a contrast medium should be administered rectally to enhance diagnostic accuracy. When suspicion of CAL remains high despite negative previous tests, further endoscopy examination should be conducted. However, endoscopic examinations become more suitable for the early diagnostic work-up after rectal resections. This review aims to provide an overview of current diagnostics for the screening and assessment of the severity of CAL after colorectal surgery.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56031,"journal":{"name":"Best Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology","volume":"70 ","pages":"Article 101925"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1521691824000507/pdfft?md5=234a8c41dad1c66d99915a982008c9f2&pid=1-s2.0-S1521691824000507-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Considerations in case of suspected anastomotic leakage in the lower GI tract\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bpg.2024.101925\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Colorectal anastomotic leakage (CAL) remains a feared complication after colorectal surgery and requires prompt detection and proper treatment. With the upswing of fast-track recovery programs in recent years this challenge has increased, as clinical features may only arise after discharge. Therefore, identification of the best diagnostic tools is of utmost importance, also since early treatment is associated with high success rates. Diagnostic tools range from general screening tools to invasive procedures to assess the severity of the leak. Laboratory tests, in particular the inflammation biomarkers C-reactive protein and procalcitonin, have a significant role in the detection of CAL after colorectal surgery. As these biomarkers are unspecific for CAL, additional imaging should be performed when blood levels are elevated. The golden standard for the detection of AL after colonic resections is a computed tomography (CT-scan). If tolerated, a contrast medium should be administered rectally to enhance diagnostic accuracy. When suspicion of CAL remains high despite negative previous tests, further endoscopy examination should be conducted. However, endoscopic examinations become more suitable for the early diagnostic work-up after rectal resections. This review aims to provide an overview of current diagnostics for the screening and assessment of the severity of CAL after colorectal surgery.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56031,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Best Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\"70 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101925\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1521691824000507/pdfft?md5=234a8c41dad1c66d99915a982008c9f2&pid=1-s2.0-S1521691824000507-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Best Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1521691824000507\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Best Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1521691824000507","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

结肠直肠吻合口漏(CAL)仍然是结肠直肠手术后令人恐惧的并发症,需要及时发现并进行适当治疗。近年来,随着快速康复计划的兴起,这一挑战也越来越大,因为临床特征可能在出院后才出现。因此,确定最佳诊断工具至关重要,因为早期治疗的成功率很高。诊断工具包括从一般筛查工具到用于评估泄漏严重程度的侵入性程序。实验室检测,尤其是炎症生物标志物 C 反应蛋白和降钙素原,在结肠直肠手术后的 CAL 检测中发挥着重要作用。由于这些生物标志物对 CAL 并不具有特异性,因此当血液水平升高时应进行额外的影像学检查。结肠切除术后检测 AL 的黄金标准是计算机断层扫描(CT 扫描)。如果可以耐受,应直肠注射造影剂以提高诊断的准确性。如果之前的检查结果为阴性,但对 CAL 的怀疑仍然很高,则应进一步进行内窥镜检查。然而,内窥镜检查更适合直肠切除术后的早期诊断工作。本综述旨在概述目前用于筛查和评估结肠直肠手术后 CAL 严重程度的诊断方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Considerations in case of suspected anastomotic leakage in the lower GI tract

Colorectal anastomotic leakage (CAL) remains a feared complication after colorectal surgery and requires prompt detection and proper treatment. With the upswing of fast-track recovery programs in recent years this challenge has increased, as clinical features may only arise after discharge. Therefore, identification of the best diagnostic tools is of utmost importance, also since early treatment is associated with high success rates. Diagnostic tools range from general screening tools to invasive procedures to assess the severity of the leak. Laboratory tests, in particular the inflammation biomarkers C-reactive protein and procalcitonin, have a significant role in the detection of CAL after colorectal surgery. As these biomarkers are unspecific for CAL, additional imaging should be performed when blood levels are elevated. The golden standard for the detection of AL after colonic resections is a computed tomography (CT-scan). If tolerated, a contrast medium should be administered rectally to enhance diagnostic accuracy. When suspicion of CAL remains high despite negative previous tests, further endoscopy examination should be conducted. However, endoscopic examinations become more suitable for the early diagnostic work-up after rectal resections. This review aims to provide an overview of current diagnostics for the screening and assessment of the severity of CAL after colorectal surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Each topic-based issue of Best Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology will provide a comprehensive review of current clinical practice and thinking within the specialty of gastroenterology.
期刊最新文献
The role of the microbiome in immune checkpoint inhibitor colitis and hepatitis The role of the gut microbiome in regulating the response to immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy Gut microbiota in colorectal cancer: From pathogenesis to clinic Editorial Board Table of Contents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1