{"title":"采用修改后的棘轮法对保证终身提取福利进行分析估值","authors":"Darcy Harcourt, Toby Daglish, Eric R. Ulm","doi":"10.1016/j.insmatheco.2024.06.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Guaranteed Lifetime Withdrawal Benefits (GLWBs) are an increasingly popular add-on to Variable Annuities, offering a guaranteed stream of payments for the remainder of the policyholder's life. GLWBs have typically been priced using numerical methods such as finite difference schemes or Monte Carlo simulations; obtaining accurate and precise solutions using these methods can be very computationally expensive. In this paper, we extend an existing method for analytic pricing of these policies to a more general fee structure. We introduce a novel variation on the commonly offered ratchet rider that more directly addresses policyholder motivation around lapse-and-reentry behaviour. We then modify our pricing method to accommodate this new rider and compare it to the existing annual ratchet with respect to a policyholder's incentive to lapse such a policy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54974,"journal":{"name":"Insurance Mathematics & Economics","volume":"118 ","pages":"Pages 59-71"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167668724000635/pdfft?md5=0a17b15f14957caf9c7a8985b553b6b5&pid=1-s2.0-S0167668724000635-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analytic valuation of guaranteed lifetime withdrawal benefits with a modified ratchet\",\"authors\":\"Darcy Harcourt, Toby Daglish, Eric R. Ulm\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.insmatheco.2024.06.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Guaranteed Lifetime Withdrawal Benefits (GLWBs) are an increasingly popular add-on to Variable Annuities, offering a guaranteed stream of payments for the remainder of the policyholder's life. GLWBs have typically been priced using numerical methods such as finite difference schemes or Monte Carlo simulations; obtaining accurate and precise solutions using these methods can be very computationally expensive. In this paper, we extend an existing method for analytic pricing of these policies to a more general fee structure. We introduce a novel variation on the commonly offered ratchet rider that more directly addresses policyholder motivation around lapse-and-reentry behaviour. We then modify our pricing method to accommodate this new rider and compare it to the existing annual ratchet with respect to a policyholder's incentive to lapse such a policy.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54974,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Insurance Mathematics & Economics\",\"volume\":\"118 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 59-71\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167668724000635/pdfft?md5=0a17b15f14957caf9c7a8985b553b6b5&pid=1-s2.0-S0167668724000635-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Insurance Mathematics & Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167668724000635\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Insurance Mathematics & Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167668724000635","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Analytic valuation of guaranteed lifetime withdrawal benefits with a modified ratchet
Guaranteed Lifetime Withdrawal Benefits (GLWBs) are an increasingly popular add-on to Variable Annuities, offering a guaranteed stream of payments for the remainder of the policyholder's life. GLWBs have typically been priced using numerical methods such as finite difference schemes or Monte Carlo simulations; obtaining accurate and precise solutions using these methods can be very computationally expensive. In this paper, we extend an existing method for analytic pricing of these policies to a more general fee structure. We introduce a novel variation on the commonly offered ratchet rider that more directly addresses policyholder motivation around lapse-and-reentry behaviour. We then modify our pricing method to accommodate this new rider and compare it to the existing annual ratchet with respect to a policyholder's incentive to lapse such a policy.
期刊介绍:
Insurance: Mathematics and Economics publishes leading research spanning all fields of actuarial science research. It appears six times per year and is the largest journal in actuarial science research around the world.
Insurance: Mathematics and Economics is an international academic journal that aims to strengthen the communication between individuals and groups who develop and apply research results in actuarial science. The journal feels a particular obligation to facilitate closer cooperation between those who conduct research in insurance mathematics and quantitative insurance economics, and practicing actuaries who are interested in the implementation of the results. To this purpose, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics publishes high-quality articles of broad international interest, concerned with either the theory of insurance mathematics and quantitative insurance economics or the inventive application of it, including empirical or experimental results. Articles that combine several of these aspects are particularly considered.