荷兰国内移民身份的死因对预期寿命差异的影响。基于人口登记的研究,2015-2019 年。

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Ssm-Population Health Pub Date : 2024-06-11 DOI:10.1016/j.ssmph.2024.101690
Maximilian Frentz-Göllnitz , Adrien Remund , Carel Harmsen , Lenny Stoeldraijer , Janine van der Toorn , Gabriele Doblhammer , Fanny Janssen
{"title":"荷兰国内移民身份的死因对预期寿命差异的影响。基于人口登记的研究,2015-2019 年。","authors":"Maximilian Frentz-Göllnitz ,&nbsp;Adrien Remund ,&nbsp;Carel Harmsen ,&nbsp;Lenny Stoeldraijer ,&nbsp;Janine van der Toorn ,&nbsp;Gabriele Doblhammer ,&nbsp;Fanny Janssen","doi":"10.1016/j.ssmph.2024.101690","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Important health differences exist in the context of international migration and residential mobility. Less is known about health differences regarding the medium-distance level of internal migration. This study examines life expectancy gaps between internal movers and stayers in the Netherlands and their underlying processes by assessing the contribution of different causes of death by age and sex. It uses individually-linked death counts and population exposures extracted from population registers, covering the native Dutch population aged 10+ from 2015 to 2019. The pooled data were disaggregated by causes-of-death group (neurodegenerative diseases, cardiovascular diseases, lifestyle-related mortality, external causes, and other causes), internal migrant status (movers and stayers, based on past 10-year residence in the 40 NUTS-3 [Nomenclature of Territorial Units for Statistics, level 3] regions), age, and sex. Comparing movers and stayers, we computed life expectancy at age 10 (e<sub>10</sub>), age- and cause-specific mortality risks, and applied decomposition methods to assess contributions of causes of death to e<sub>10</sub> gaps. In the Netherlands in 2015–2019, e<sub>10</sub> was lower for movers between NUTS-3 regions than stayers (males: 2.49 years; females: 3.51 years), due to excess mortality for movers at most ages. Movers only had a lower mortality than stayers at younger working ages (males: ages 20–44; females: ages 20–34). Mortality from neurodegenerative diseases and cardiovascular diseases were the largest contributors to the e<sub>10</sub> gap, especially at ages 75+ and for females. Mortality from lifestyle-related and external causes of death contributed less, with the largest contributions for females aged 75–89 and males aged 45–69. The lower e<sub>10</sub> of movers in the Netherlands is likely explained by health selection effects–in particular care-related moves as coping behaviour–rather than by causal effects through risk accumulation. Research focusing on regional or spatial heterogeneity of the mover-stayer health gap would be insightful to further understand these processes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47780,"journal":{"name":"Ssm-Population Health","volume":"27 ","pages":"Article 101690"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352827324000910/pdfft?md5=0b47ad59a437af0009cbd48972cc7aa1&pid=1-s2.0-S2352827324000910-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contributions of causes of death to differentials in life expectancy by internal migrant status in the Netherlands. A population register based study, 2015–2019\",\"authors\":\"Maximilian Frentz-Göllnitz ,&nbsp;Adrien Remund ,&nbsp;Carel Harmsen ,&nbsp;Lenny Stoeldraijer ,&nbsp;Janine van der Toorn ,&nbsp;Gabriele Doblhammer ,&nbsp;Fanny Janssen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ssmph.2024.101690\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Important health differences exist in the context of international migration and residential mobility. Less is known about health differences regarding the medium-distance level of internal migration. This study examines life expectancy gaps between internal movers and stayers in the Netherlands and their underlying processes by assessing the contribution of different causes of death by age and sex. It uses individually-linked death counts and population exposures extracted from population registers, covering the native Dutch population aged 10+ from 2015 to 2019. The pooled data were disaggregated by causes-of-death group (neurodegenerative diseases, cardiovascular diseases, lifestyle-related mortality, external causes, and other causes), internal migrant status (movers and stayers, based on past 10-year residence in the 40 NUTS-3 [Nomenclature of Territorial Units for Statistics, level 3] regions), age, and sex. Comparing movers and stayers, we computed life expectancy at age 10 (e<sub>10</sub>), age- and cause-specific mortality risks, and applied decomposition methods to assess contributions of causes of death to e<sub>10</sub> gaps. In the Netherlands in 2015–2019, e<sub>10</sub> was lower for movers between NUTS-3 regions than stayers (males: 2.49 years; females: 3.51 years), due to excess mortality for movers at most ages. Movers only had a lower mortality than stayers at younger working ages (males: ages 20–44; females: ages 20–34). Mortality from neurodegenerative diseases and cardiovascular diseases were the largest contributors to the e<sub>10</sub> gap, especially at ages 75+ and for females. Mortality from lifestyle-related and external causes of death contributed less, with the largest contributions for females aged 75–89 and males aged 45–69. The lower e<sub>10</sub> of movers in the Netherlands is likely explained by health selection effects–in particular care-related moves as coping behaviour–rather than by causal effects through risk accumulation. Research focusing on regional or spatial heterogeneity of the mover-stayer health gap would be insightful to further understand these processes.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47780,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ssm-Population Health\",\"volume\":\"27 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101690\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352827324000910/pdfft?md5=0b47ad59a437af0009cbd48972cc7aa1&pid=1-s2.0-S2352827324000910-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ssm-Population Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352827324000910\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ssm-Population Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352827324000910","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在国际移徙和居住地流动方面存在着重要的健康差异。人们对中距离国内移民的健康差异知之甚少。本研究通过评估按年龄和性别划分的不同死因所造成的影响,研究了荷兰国内迁移者和滞留者之间的预期寿命差距及其潜在过程。研究使用了从人口登记册中提取的与个人相关的死亡人数和人口暴露数据,涵盖了 2015 年至 2019 年 10 岁以上的荷兰本地人口。汇总数据按死亡原因类别(神经退行性疾病、心血管疾病、生活方式相关死亡率、外部原因和其他原因)、国内移民身份(根据过去 10 年在 40 个 NUTS-3[统计用领土单位命名法,第 3 级]地区的居住情况,分为迁入者和滞留者)、年龄和性别分列。比较迁入者和迁出者,我们计算了 10 岁时的预期寿命(e10)、特定年龄和原因的死亡风险,并应用分解方法评估了死亡原因对 e10 差距的贡献。在 2015-2019 年的荷兰,NUTS-3 地区之间的迁移者的 10 岁预期寿命(男性:2.49 岁;女性:3.51 岁)低于留守者(男性:2.49 岁;女性:3.51 岁),原因是迁移者在大多数年龄段的死亡率过高。只有在较年轻的工作年龄段(男性:20-44 岁;女性:20-34 岁),迁居者的死亡率低于留居者。神经退行性疾病和心血管疾病的死亡率是造成 e10 差距的最大原因,尤其是在 75 岁以上和女性年龄段。与生活方式相关的死亡率和外部死因造成的差距较小,其中 75-89 岁女性和 45-69 岁男性的差距最大。荷兰迁移者的 e10 值较低的原因可能是健康选择效应--特别是作为应对行为的与护理有关的迁移--而不是风险积累的因果效应。对迁徙者与居住者健康差距的地区或空间异质性进行研究,将有助于进一步了解这些过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Contributions of causes of death to differentials in life expectancy by internal migrant status in the Netherlands. A population register based study, 2015–2019

Important health differences exist in the context of international migration and residential mobility. Less is known about health differences regarding the medium-distance level of internal migration. This study examines life expectancy gaps between internal movers and stayers in the Netherlands and their underlying processes by assessing the contribution of different causes of death by age and sex. It uses individually-linked death counts and population exposures extracted from population registers, covering the native Dutch population aged 10+ from 2015 to 2019. The pooled data were disaggregated by causes-of-death group (neurodegenerative diseases, cardiovascular diseases, lifestyle-related mortality, external causes, and other causes), internal migrant status (movers and stayers, based on past 10-year residence in the 40 NUTS-3 [Nomenclature of Territorial Units for Statistics, level 3] regions), age, and sex. Comparing movers and stayers, we computed life expectancy at age 10 (e10), age- and cause-specific mortality risks, and applied decomposition methods to assess contributions of causes of death to e10 gaps. In the Netherlands in 2015–2019, e10 was lower for movers between NUTS-3 regions than stayers (males: 2.49 years; females: 3.51 years), due to excess mortality for movers at most ages. Movers only had a lower mortality than stayers at younger working ages (males: ages 20–44; females: ages 20–34). Mortality from neurodegenerative diseases and cardiovascular diseases were the largest contributors to the e10 gap, especially at ages 75+ and for females. Mortality from lifestyle-related and external causes of death contributed less, with the largest contributions for females aged 75–89 and males aged 45–69. The lower e10 of movers in the Netherlands is likely explained by health selection effects–in particular care-related moves as coping behaviour–rather than by causal effects through risk accumulation. Research focusing on regional or spatial heterogeneity of the mover-stayer health gap would be insightful to further understand these processes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ssm-Population Health
Ssm-Population Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.10%
发文量
298
审稿时长
101 days
期刊介绍: SSM - Population Health. The new online only, open access, peer reviewed journal in all areas relating Social Science research to population health. SSM - Population Health shares the same Editors-in Chief and general approach to manuscripts as its sister journal, Social Science & Medicine. The journal takes a broad approach to the field especially welcoming interdisciplinary papers from across the Social Sciences and allied areas. SSM - Population Health offers an alternative outlet for work which might not be considered, or is classed as ''out of scope'' elsewhere, and prioritizes fast peer review and publication to the benefit of authors and readers. The journal welcomes all types of paper from traditional primary research articles, replication studies, short communications, methodological studies, instrument validation, opinion pieces, literature reviews, etc. SSM - Population Health also offers the opportunity to publish special issues or sections to reflect current interest and research in topical or developing areas. The journal fully supports authors wanting to present their research in an innovative fashion though the use of multimedia formats.
期刊最新文献
Unincorporation in counties as a political determinant of health: An exploration of five states Risk factors for Alzheimer's disease and related dementias in U.S. honor cultures Spatial accessibility to gun violence exposure on walkable routes to and from school Associations of objective and subjective relative deprivation with health, happiness, and life satisfaction Against the grain: International migrants, the children of migrants and national life expectancy in Sweden, 1990–2019
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1