NT-proBNP水平过高和过低的心衰患者长期不良预后风险过高:一项为期 7 年的随访研究(NorthStar 试验)

IF 2.5 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS IJC Heart and Vasculature Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ijcha.2024.101441
{"title":"NT-proBNP水平过高和过低的心衰患者长期不良预后风险过高:一项为期 7 年的随访研究(NorthStar 试验)","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ijcha.2024.101441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>This study investigated excess risk in patients with heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF) with or without elevated levels of NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients with HFrEF from the NorthStar cohort (n = 1120) were matched on age, sex, and presence of AF (atrial fibrillation/flutter) to five controls without HFrEF from The Danish National Patient Registries. Patients were compared with controls before and after stratification according to baseline NT-proBNP levels, with cutoffs defined as &lt;/≥ 600 pg/ml in patients with sinus rhythm and &lt;/≥ 900 pg/ml in patients with AF. The primary composite endpoint was a 7-year risk of cardiovascular death or HF admission.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In the HFrEF cohort, 704 patients had high NT-proBNP (median age, 73; mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), 33%). 416 patients had low NT-proBNP (median age, 65; LVEF, 30%). Patients from both groups were in NYHA class I-III. The primary endpoint occurred in 531 patients (75.4%) with HFrEF and elevated NT-proBNP, and 748 controls (21.3%) (risk difference, 54.2%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 50.7–57.6%). In comparison, it occurred in 199 patients (47.9%) with HFrEF and without elevated NT-proBNP, and 185 controls (8,9%) (risk difference, 38.9%; 95% CI 34.0–43.9%). Risk differences for all secondary endpoints were significant, except for overall mortality in the low NT-proBNP group (risk difference, 3.8%; 95% CI, −0.4–8.0%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study identified a significant excess risk in patients with HFrEF across various endpoints, which persisted after stratification into high and low levels of NT-proBNP.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38026,"journal":{"name":"IJC Heart and Vasculature","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352906724001076/pdfft?md5=b29a5b5f0c4046e2c0d0d0097f1ff42c&pid=1-s2.0-S2352906724001076-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Excess long-term risk of adverse outcomes in heart failure patients with high and low levels of NT-proBNP: A 7-year follow-up study (NorthStar Trial)\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijcha.2024.101441\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>This study investigated excess risk in patients with heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF) with or without elevated levels of NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients with HFrEF from the NorthStar cohort (n = 1120) were matched on age, sex, and presence of AF (atrial fibrillation/flutter) to five controls without HFrEF from The Danish National Patient Registries. Patients were compared with controls before and after stratification according to baseline NT-proBNP levels, with cutoffs defined as &lt;/≥ 600 pg/ml in patients with sinus rhythm and &lt;/≥ 900 pg/ml in patients with AF. The primary composite endpoint was a 7-year risk of cardiovascular death or HF admission.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In the HFrEF cohort, 704 patients had high NT-proBNP (median age, 73; mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), 33%). 416 patients had low NT-proBNP (median age, 65; LVEF, 30%). Patients from both groups were in NYHA class I-III. The primary endpoint occurred in 531 patients (75.4%) with HFrEF and elevated NT-proBNP, and 748 controls (21.3%) (risk difference, 54.2%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 50.7–57.6%). In comparison, it occurred in 199 patients (47.9%) with HFrEF and without elevated NT-proBNP, and 185 controls (8,9%) (risk difference, 38.9%; 95% CI 34.0–43.9%). Risk differences for all secondary endpoints were significant, except for overall mortality in the low NT-proBNP group (risk difference, 3.8%; 95% CI, −0.4–8.0%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study identified a significant excess risk in patients with HFrEF across various endpoints, which persisted after stratification into high and low levels of NT-proBNP.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38026,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IJC Heart and Vasculature\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352906724001076/pdfft?md5=b29a5b5f0c4046e2c0d0d0097f1ff42c&pid=1-s2.0-S2352906724001076-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IJC Heart and Vasculature\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352906724001076\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IJC Heart and Vasculature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352906724001076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景本研究调查了左心室射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HFrEF)患者伴有或不伴有 NT-proBNP(N-末端前脑钠尿肽)水平升高的过高风险。方法将来自 NorthStar 队列的 HFrEF 患者(n = 1120)与来自丹麦国家患者登记处的五名无 HFrEF 的对照组患者(n = 1120)进行年龄、性别和房颤(心房颤动/扑动)匹配。根据基线 NT-proBNP 水平对患者和对照组进行分层前后的比较,窦性心律患者的分界线为 600 pg/ml,房颤患者的分界线为 900 pg/ml。结果在 HFrEF 队列中,704 名患者 NT-proBNP 偏高(中位年龄 73 岁;平均左心室射血分数(LVEF)33%)。416 名患者 NT-proBNP 偏低(中位年龄 65 岁;LVEF 30%)。两组患者均为 NYHA I-III 级。531 名 HFrEF 和 NT-proBNP 升高的患者(75.4%)和 748 名对照组患者(21.3%)出现了主要终点(风险差异为 54.2%;95% 置信区间 (CI) 为 50.7-57.6%)。相比之下,199 名未出现 NT-proBNP 升高的 HFrEF 患者(47.9%)和 185 名对照组患者(8.9%)出现了这种情况(风险差异为 38.9%;95% 置信区间为 34.0-43.9%)。除了低 NT-proBNP 组的总死亡率(风险差异为 3.8%;95% CI 为 -0.4-8.0%)外,所有次要终点的风险差异均显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Excess long-term risk of adverse outcomes in heart failure patients with high and low levels of NT-proBNP: A 7-year follow-up study (NorthStar Trial)

Background

This study investigated excess risk in patients with heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF) with or without elevated levels of NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide).

Methods

Patients with HFrEF from the NorthStar cohort (n = 1120) were matched on age, sex, and presence of AF (atrial fibrillation/flutter) to five controls without HFrEF from The Danish National Patient Registries. Patients were compared with controls before and after stratification according to baseline NT-proBNP levels, with cutoffs defined as </≥ 600 pg/ml in patients with sinus rhythm and </≥ 900 pg/ml in patients with AF. The primary composite endpoint was a 7-year risk of cardiovascular death or HF admission.

Results

In the HFrEF cohort, 704 patients had high NT-proBNP (median age, 73; mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), 33%). 416 patients had low NT-proBNP (median age, 65; LVEF, 30%). Patients from both groups were in NYHA class I-III. The primary endpoint occurred in 531 patients (75.4%) with HFrEF and elevated NT-proBNP, and 748 controls (21.3%) (risk difference, 54.2%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 50.7–57.6%). In comparison, it occurred in 199 patients (47.9%) with HFrEF and without elevated NT-proBNP, and 185 controls (8,9%) (risk difference, 38.9%; 95% CI 34.0–43.9%). Risk differences for all secondary endpoints were significant, except for overall mortality in the low NT-proBNP group (risk difference, 3.8%; 95% CI, −0.4–8.0%).

Conclusion

This study identified a significant excess risk in patients with HFrEF across various endpoints, which persisted after stratification into high and low levels of NT-proBNP.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
IJC Heart and Vasculature
IJC Heart and Vasculature Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
10.30%
发文量
216
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: IJC Heart & Vasculature is an online-only, open-access journal dedicated to publishing original articles and reviews (also Editorials and Letters to the Editor) which report on structural and functional cardiovascular pathology, with an emphasis on imaging and disease pathophysiology. Articles must be authentic, educational, clinically relevant, and original in their content and scientific approach. IJC Heart & Vasculature requires the highest standards of scientific integrity in order to promote reliable, reproducible and verifiable research findings. All authors are advised to consult the Principles of Ethical Publishing in the International Journal of Cardiology before submitting a manuscript. Submission of a manuscript to this journal gives the publisher the right to publish that paper if it is accepted. Manuscripts may be edited to improve clarity and expression.
期刊最新文献
The role of urine sodium in acutely decompensated heart failure Comparison of the effects of contrast medium and low-molecular-weight dextran on coronary optical coherence tomographic imaging in relatively complex coronary lesions Test-retest reproducibility of absolute myocardial blood flow obtained using stress dynamic CT myocardial perfusion imaging Real-world evidence of direct oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation and cancer: A meta-analysis Blunted increase in plasma BNP during acute coronary syndrome attacks in obese patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1