美国的医疗保险:有效维持不平等的案例?

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Ssm-Population Health Pub Date : 2024-06-08 DOI:10.1016/j.ssmph.2024.101687
{"title":"美国的医疗保险:有效维持不平等的案例?","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ssmph.2024.101687","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The theory of Effectively Maintained Inequality (EMI) (Lucas, 2001) posits that goods have both quantitative (how much?) and qualitative (what kind?) dimensions. Coupled with the hypothesized mechanisms of EMI, this simple observation greatly complicates research and policy development concerning inequality. First applied to explain educational inequality in the United States, evidence for the theory has been found in education systems in over 20 countries, including Chile, China, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Egypt, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Nigeria, South Africa, and South Korea. Yet, while EMI was proposed as a general theory of inequality, to date no research has assessed its applicability to domains outside education. This work uses nearly two decades of National Health Interview Survey data (N = 451,161) to provide the first effort to assess whether EMI illuminates <em>patterns</em> of inequality outside education, by taking up the issue of health insurance in the United States.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47780,"journal":{"name":"Ssm-Population Health","volume":"28 ","pages":"Article 101687"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Health insurance in the United States: A case of effectively maintained inequality?\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ssmph.2024.101687\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The theory of Effectively Maintained Inequality (EMI) (Lucas, 2001) posits that goods have both quantitative (how much?) and qualitative (what kind?) dimensions. Coupled with the hypothesized mechanisms of EMI, this simple observation greatly complicates research and policy development concerning inequality. First applied to explain educational inequality in the United States, evidence for the theory has been found in education systems in over 20 countries, including Chile, China, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Egypt, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Nigeria, South Africa, and South Korea. Yet, while EMI was proposed as a general theory of inequality, to date no research has assessed its applicability to domains outside education. This work uses nearly two decades of National Health Interview Survey data (N = 451,161) to provide the first effort to assess whether EMI illuminates <em>patterns</em> of inequality outside education, by taking up the issue of health insurance in the United States.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47780,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ssm-Population Health\",\"volume\":\"28 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101687\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ssm-Population Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352827324000880\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ssm-Population Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352827324000880","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有效维持不平等(EMI)理论(Lucas,2001 年)认为,商品既有量的方面(多少?再加上假设的 EMI 机制,这一简单的观察结果使有关不平等的研究和政策制定变得更加复杂。该理论最初被用于解释美国的教育不平等现象,目前已在智利、中国、捷克、丹麦、埃及、德国、希腊、爱尔兰、尼日利亚、南非和韩国等 20 多个国家的教育系统中找到了证据。然而,虽然 EMI 是作为不平等的一般理论提出的,但迄今为止,还没有任何研究对其在教育以外领域的适用性进行过评估。本研究利用近二十年的全国健康访谈调查数据(N = 451,161 ),以美国的医疗保险问题为切入点,首次尝试评估 EMI 是否能揭示教育以外的不平等模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Health insurance in the United States: A case of effectively maintained inequality?
The theory of Effectively Maintained Inequality (EMI) (Lucas, 2001) posits that goods have both quantitative (how much?) and qualitative (what kind?) dimensions. Coupled with the hypothesized mechanisms of EMI, this simple observation greatly complicates research and policy development concerning inequality. First applied to explain educational inequality in the United States, evidence for the theory has been found in education systems in over 20 countries, including Chile, China, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Egypt, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Nigeria, South Africa, and South Korea. Yet, while EMI was proposed as a general theory of inequality, to date no research has assessed its applicability to domains outside education. This work uses nearly two decades of National Health Interview Survey data (N = 451,161) to provide the first effort to assess whether EMI illuminates patterns of inequality outside education, by taking up the issue of health insurance in the United States.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ssm-Population Health
Ssm-Population Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.10%
发文量
298
审稿时长
101 days
期刊介绍: SSM - Population Health. The new online only, open access, peer reviewed journal in all areas relating Social Science research to population health. SSM - Population Health shares the same Editors-in Chief and general approach to manuscripts as its sister journal, Social Science & Medicine. The journal takes a broad approach to the field especially welcoming interdisciplinary papers from across the Social Sciences and allied areas. SSM - Population Health offers an alternative outlet for work which might not be considered, or is classed as ''out of scope'' elsewhere, and prioritizes fast peer review and publication to the benefit of authors and readers. The journal welcomes all types of paper from traditional primary research articles, replication studies, short communications, methodological studies, instrument validation, opinion pieces, literature reviews, etc. SSM - Population Health also offers the opportunity to publish special issues or sections to reflect current interest and research in topical or developing areas. The journal fully supports authors wanting to present their research in an innovative fashion though the use of multimedia formats.
期刊最新文献
Spatial accessibility to gun violence exposure on walkable routes to and from school Associations of objective and subjective relative deprivation with health, happiness, and life satisfaction Against the grain: International migrants, the children of migrants and national life expectancy in Sweden, 1990–2019 Cross national patterns in educational inequalities in functional limitations among middle aged and older adults at two time points Barriers to child vaccination: The role of international sanctions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1