内窥镜腓骨速桥技术:降低插入性跟腱病的术后并发症发生率

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research Pub Date : 2024-06-15 DOI:10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103916
{"title":"内窥镜腓骨速桥技术:降低插入性跟腱病的术后并发症发生率","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103916","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>An endoscopic calcaneal SpeedBridge technique was described recently. The primary objective of this study was to report the postoperative complications seen with calcaneal SpeedBridge repair. The secondary objective was to report short- and medium-term functional outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Hypothesis</h3><p>Postoperative complications are less common with endoscopic vs. open SpeedBridge suturing.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>The endoscopic SpeedBridge technique was used in 9 patients who had insertional Achilles tendinopathy<span> refractory to conservative management. The patients were evaluated at least 24 months after the procedure. Infectious and wound-healing complications were recorded. Visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for pain and patient satisfaction, shoeing difficulties, the European Foot and Ankle Society (EFAS) score, and the Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment-Achilles (VISA-A) score were assessed.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>During the mean follow-up of 25.3 months, no complications were recorded. The EFAS and VISA-A scores were 37/40 and 91/100, respectively. The mean VAS scores for pain and satisfaction were 1.7/10 and 9.3/10, respectively. No patients reported shoeing difficulties.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Endoscopic calcaneal SpeedBridge suturing is associated with a lower complication rate compared to the open variant. Clinical outcomes are highly satisfactory in the short and middle terms.</p></div><div><h3>Level of evidence</h3><p>IV; retrospective observational cohort study.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54664,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Endoscopic calcaneal SpeedBridge technique: Decreased postoperative complication rate in insertional achilles tendinopathy\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103916\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>An endoscopic calcaneal SpeedBridge technique was described recently. The primary objective of this study was to report the postoperative complications seen with calcaneal SpeedBridge repair. The secondary objective was to report short- and medium-term functional outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Hypothesis</h3><p>Postoperative complications are less common with endoscopic vs. open SpeedBridge suturing.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>The endoscopic SpeedBridge technique was used in 9 patients who had insertional Achilles tendinopathy<span> refractory to conservative management. The patients were evaluated at least 24 months after the procedure. Infectious and wound-healing complications were recorded. Visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for pain and patient satisfaction, shoeing difficulties, the European Foot and Ankle Society (EFAS) score, and the Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment-Achilles (VISA-A) score were assessed.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>During the mean follow-up of 25.3 months, no complications were recorded. The EFAS and VISA-A scores were 37/40 and 91/100, respectively. The mean VAS scores for pain and satisfaction were 1.7/10 and 9.3/10, respectively. No patients reported shoeing difficulties.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Endoscopic calcaneal SpeedBridge suturing is associated with a lower complication rate compared to the open variant. Clinical outcomes are highly satisfactory in the short and middle terms.</p></div><div><h3>Level of evidence</h3><p>IV; retrospective observational cohort study.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877056824001634\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877056824001634","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景最近介绍了一种内窥镜下的钙骨SpeedBridge技术。本研究的主要目的是报告小腿SpeedBridge修复术的术后并发症。假设内窥镜与开放式 SpeedBridge 缝合术相比,术后并发症更少。材料和方法内窥镜 SpeedBridge 技术用于 9 例保守治疗无效的插入性跟腱病患者。术后至少 24 个月对患者进行评估。对感染和伤口愈合并发症进行了记录。对疼痛和患者满意度的视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分、穿鞋困难程度、欧洲足踝协会(EFAS)评分和维多利亚体育学院跟腱评估(VISA-A)评分进行了评估。EFAS和VISA-A评分分别为37/40和91/100。疼痛和满意度的平均 VAS 评分分别为 1.7/10 和 9.3/10。结论与开放式手术相比,内窥镜钙桥缝合术的并发症发生率较低。证据等级IV;回顾性观察队列研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Endoscopic calcaneal SpeedBridge technique: Decreased postoperative complication rate in insertional achilles tendinopathy

Background

An endoscopic calcaneal SpeedBridge technique was described recently. The primary objective of this study was to report the postoperative complications seen with calcaneal SpeedBridge repair. The secondary objective was to report short- and medium-term functional outcomes.

Hypothesis

Postoperative complications are less common with endoscopic vs. open SpeedBridge suturing.

Material and methods

The endoscopic SpeedBridge technique was used in 9 patients who had insertional Achilles tendinopathy refractory to conservative management. The patients were evaluated at least 24 months after the procedure. Infectious and wound-healing complications were recorded. Visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for pain and patient satisfaction, shoeing difficulties, the European Foot and Ankle Society (EFAS) score, and the Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment-Achilles (VISA-A) score were assessed.

Results

During the mean follow-up of 25.3 months, no complications were recorded. The EFAS and VISA-A scores were 37/40 and 91/100, respectively. The mean VAS scores for pain and satisfaction were 1.7/10 and 9.3/10, respectively. No patients reported shoeing difficulties.

Conclusion

Endoscopic calcaneal SpeedBridge suturing is associated with a lower complication rate compared to the open variant. Clinical outcomes are highly satisfactory in the short and middle terms.

Level of evidence

IV; retrospective observational cohort study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
26.10%
发文量
329
审稿时长
12.5 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research (OTSR) publishes original scientific work in English related to all domains of orthopaedics. Original articles, Reviews, Technical notes and Concise follow-up of a former OTSR study are published in English in electronic form only and indexed in the main international databases.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Contents Diagnostic criteria of forearm chronic exertional compartment syndrome: a systematic review. Lag screw versus locking plate fixation for traumatic displaced medial malleolar fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. What does the SOFCOT-RENACOT 2024 hip prosthesis register tell us?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1