{"title":"局部手术在新发 IV 期乳腺癌中的作用:随机对照试验荟萃分析","authors":"Wenqi Zhou , Yeli Yue , Jing Xiong , Wei Li , Xiaohua Zeng","doi":"10.1016/j.ctrv.2024.102784","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>We performed an updated <em>meta</em>-analysis to explore the value of locoregional surgery in de novo stage IV breast cancer patients.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A literature search was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials comparing primary tumor resection with systemic therapy in de novo stage IV breast cancer. The hazard ratio (HR) of overall survival (OS), local relapse-free survival (LRFS), and distant relapse-free survival (DRFS) were estimated and pooled.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Six studies were eligible, including a total of 1368 patients. Both OS (HR = 0.86; 95 %CI: 0.77–0.96; p = 0.01; <em>I<sup>2</sup></em> = 45 %) and LRFS (HR = 0.35; 95 %CI: 0.20–0.62; p = 0.0003; <em>I<sup>2</sup></em> = 83 %) were significantly improved with locoregional surgery compared with systemic therapy alone. There was no significant difference in terms of DRFS (HR = 0.96; 95 %CI: 0.41–2.22; p = 0.92; <em>I<sup>2</sup></em> = 86 %). The OS benefit was more pronounced in hormone receptor-positive patients (HR = 0.79; p = 0.003) and HER2-negative patients (HR = 0.80; p = 0.003).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study demonstrated that locoregional surgery conferred significant OS and LRFS benefits in de novo stage IV breast cancer patients and may serve as an alternative choice for selected patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9537,"journal":{"name":"Cancer treatment reviews","volume":"129 ","pages":"Article 102784"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of locoregional surgery in de novo stage IV breast cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials\",\"authors\":\"Wenqi Zhou , Yeli Yue , Jing Xiong , Wei Li , Xiaohua Zeng\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ctrv.2024.102784\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>We performed an updated <em>meta</em>-analysis to explore the value of locoregional surgery in de novo stage IV breast cancer patients.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A literature search was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials comparing primary tumor resection with systemic therapy in de novo stage IV breast cancer. The hazard ratio (HR) of overall survival (OS), local relapse-free survival (LRFS), and distant relapse-free survival (DRFS) were estimated and pooled.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Six studies were eligible, including a total of 1368 patients. Both OS (HR = 0.86; 95 %CI: 0.77–0.96; p = 0.01; <em>I<sup>2</sup></em> = 45 %) and LRFS (HR = 0.35; 95 %CI: 0.20–0.62; p = 0.0003; <em>I<sup>2</sup></em> = 83 %) were significantly improved with locoregional surgery compared with systemic therapy alone. There was no significant difference in terms of DRFS (HR = 0.96; 95 %CI: 0.41–2.22; p = 0.92; <em>I<sup>2</sup></em> = 86 %). The OS benefit was more pronounced in hormone receptor-positive patients (HR = 0.79; p = 0.003) and HER2-negative patients (HR = 0.80; p = 0.003).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study demonstrated that locoregional surgery conferred significant OS and LRFS benefits in de novo stage IV breast cancer patients and may serve as an alternative choice for selected patients.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9537,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer treatment reviews\",\"volume\":\"129 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102784\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer treatment reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305737224001129\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer treatment reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305737224001129","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The role of locoregional surgery in de novo stage IV breast cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Background
We performed an updated meta-analysis to explore the value of locoregional surgery in de novo stage IV breast cancer patients.
Methods
A literature search was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials comparing primary tumor resection with systemic therapy in de novo stage IV breast cancer. The hazard ratio (HR) of overall survival (OS), local relapse-free survival (LRFS), and distant relapse-free survival (DRFS) were estimated and pooled.
Results
Six studies were eligible, including a total of 1368 patients. Both OS (HR = 0.86; 95 %CI: 0.77–0.96; p = 0.01; I2 = 45 %) and LRFS (HR = 0.35; 95 %CI: 0.20–0.62; p = 0.0003; I2 = 83 %) were significantly improved with locoregional surgery compared with systemic therapy alone. There was no significant difference in terms of DRFS (HR = 0.96; 95 %CI: 0.41–2.22; p = 0.92; I2 = 86 %). The OS benefit was more pronounced in hormone receptor-positive patients (HR = 0.79; p = 0.003) and HER2-negative patients (HR = 0.80; p = 0.003).
Conclusions
This study demonstrated that locoregional surgery conferred significant OS and LRFS benefits in de novo stage IV breast cancer patients and may serve as an alternative choice for selected patients.
期刊介绍:
Cancer Treatment Reviews
Journal Overview:
International journal focused on developments in cancer treatment research
Publishes state-of-the-art, authoritative reviews to keep clinicians and researchers informed
Regular Sections in Each Issue:
Comments on Controversy
Tumor Reviews
Anti-tumor Treatments
New Drugs
Complications of Treatment
General and Supportive Care
Laboratory/Clinic Interface
Submission and Editorial System:
Online submission and editorial system for Cancer Treatment Reviews