放疗后溶解性脊柱转移灶的再矿化--传统体外放射治疗与立体定向烧蚀体放射治疗比较的回顾性队列研究

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology Pub Date : 2024-06-13 DOI:10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100805
Ruben Van den Brande , Maxim Van den Kieboom , Marc Peeters , Charlotte Billiet , Erik Van de Kelft
{"title":"放疗后溶解性脊柱转移灶的再矿化--传统体外放射治疗与立体定向烧蚀体放射治疗比较的回顾性队列研究","authors":"Ruben Van den Brande ,&nbsp;Maxim Van den Kieboom ,&nbsp;Marc Peeters ,&nbsp;Charlotte Billiet ,&nbsp;Erik Van de Kelft","doi":"10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100805","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Osteolytic spinal metastases (SM) have a higher risk of fracture. In this study we aim to confirm the remineralization of lytic SM after radiation therapy. Secondary the influence of SBRT compared to cEBRT and tumor type will be analyzed.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective cohort study was performed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>87 patients, 100 SM were included. 29 received SBRT, 71 cEBRT. Most common primary tumors were breast (35 %), lung (26 %) and renal (11 %). Both cEBRT and SBRT resulted in a significant increase of bone mineral density (BMD) (83.76 HU ± 5.72 → 241.41 HU ± 22.58 (p &lt; 0.001) and 82.45 ± 9.13 → 179.38 ± 47.83p = 0.026). There was a significant increase in absolute difference of BMD between the SM and reference vertebrae (p &lt; 0.001). There was no significant difference between SBRT and cEBRT. There was no increase of BMD in renal lytic SM after radiation therapy (pre-treatment: 85.96 HU ± 19.07; 3 m 92.00 HU ± 21.86 (p = 0.882); 6 m 92.06 HU ± 23.94 (p = 0.902); 9 m 70.44 HU ± 7.45 (p = 0.213); 12 m 98.08 HU ± 11.24 (p = 0.740)). In all other primary tumors, a significant increase of BMD after radiation therapy was demonstrated (p &lt; 0,05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>We conclude that the BMD of lytic SM increases significantly after radiation therapy. Lytic SM of primary renal tumors are the exception; there is no significant remineralization of renal lytic SM after radiation therapy. There is no benefit of SBRT over cEBRT in this remineralization. These findings should be taken into account when deciding on surgery in the potentially unstable group defined by the spinal instability neoplastic score.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10342,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S240563082400082X/pdfft?md5=4f8ef0023f8c09ab89107f6ffeef76aa&pid=1-s2.0-S240563082400082X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Remineralization of lytic spinal metastases after radiation therapy – A retrospective cohort study comparing conventional external beam radiation therapy with stereotactic ablative body radiation\",\"authors\":\"Ruben Van den Brande ,&nbsp;Maxim Van den Kieboom ,&nbsp;Marc Peeters ,&nbsp;Charlotte Billiet ,&nbsp;Erik Van de Kelft\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100805\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Osteolytic spinal metastases (SM) have a higher risk of fracture. In this study we aim to confirm the remineralization of lytic SM after radiation therapy. Secondary the influence of SBRT compared to cEBRT and tumor type will be analyzed.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective cohort study was performed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>87 patients, 100 SM were included. 29 received SBRT, 71 cEBRT. Most common primary tumors were breast (35 %), lung (26 %) and renal (11 %). Both cEBRT and SBRT resulted in a significant increase of bone mineral density (BMD) (83.76 HU ± 5.72 → 241.41 HU ± 22.58 (p &lt; 0.001) and 82.45 ± 9.13 → 179.38 ± 47.83p = 0.026). There was a significant increase in absolute difference of BMD between the SM and reference vertebrae (p &lt; 0.001). There was no significant difference between SBRT and cEBRT. There was no increase of BMD in renal lytic SM after radiation therapy (pre-treatment: 85.96 HU ± 19.07; 3 m 92.00 HU ± 21.86 (p = 0.882); 6 m 92.06 HU ± 23.94 (p = 0.902); 9 m 70.44 HU ± 7.45 (p = 0.213); 12 m 98.08 HU ± 11.24 (p = 0.740)). In all other primary tumors, a significant increase of BMD after radiation therapy was demonstrated (p &lt; 0,05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>We conclude that the BMD of lytic SM increases significantly after radiation therapy. Lytic SM of primary renal tumors are the exception; there is no significant remineralization of renal lytic SM after radiation therapy. There is no benefit of SBRT over cEBRT in this remineralization. These findings should be taken into account when deciding on surgery in the potentially unstable group defined by the spinal instability neoplastic score.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10342,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S240563082400082X/pdfft?md5=4f8ef0023f8c09ab89107f6ffeef76aa&pid=1-s2.0-S240563082400082X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S240563082400082X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S240563082400082X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言溶骨性脊柱转移瘤(SM)发生骨折的风险较高。在这项研究中,我们旨在证实溶骨性脊柱转移瘤在放疗后的再矿化情况。方法进行了一项回顾性队列研究。29例接受了SBRT,71例接受了cEBRT。最常见的原发肿瘤是乳腺癌(35%)、肺癌(26%)和肾癌(11%)。cEBRT 和 SBRT 均可显著增加骨矿物质密度(BMD)(83.76 HU ± 5.72 → 241.41 HU ± 22.58 (p < 0.001) 和 82.45 ± 9.13 → 179.38 ± 47.83p = 0.026)。SM椎体和参照椎体之间的 BMD 绝对值差异明显增加(p < 0.001)。SBRT 和 cEBRT 之间无明显差异。放疗后,肾溶解性 SM 的 BMD 没有增加(治疗前:85.96 HU ± 19.07;3 m 92.00 HU ± 21.86(p = 0.882);6 m 92.06 HU ± 23.94(p = 0.902);9 m 70.44 HU ± 7.45(p = 0.213);12 m 98.08 HU ± 11.24(p = 0.740))。结论我们得出结论,溶血性 SM 的 BMD 在放疗后显著增加。原发性肾肿瘤的溶解性 SM 是个例外;放疗后肾溶解性 SM 没有明显的再矿化。在这种再矿化方面,SBRT 比 cEBRT 没有优势。在根据脊柱不稳定性肿瘤评分确定潜在不稳定组的手术方案时,应考虑到这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Remineralization of lytic spinal metastases after radiation therapy – A retrospective cohort study comparing conventional external beam radiation therapy with stereotactic ablative body radiation

Introduction

Osteolytic spinal metastases (SM) have a higher risk of fracture. In this study we aim to confirm the remineralization of lytic SM after radiation therapy. Secondary the influence of SBRT compared to cEBRT and tumor type will be analyzed.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was performed.

Results

87 patients, 100 SM were included. 29 received SBRT, 71 cEBRT. Most common primary tumors were breast (35 %), lung (26 %) and renal (11 %). Both cEBRT and SBRT resulted in a significant increase of bone mineral density (BMD) (83.76 HU ± 5.72 → 241.41 HU ± 22.58 (p < 0.001) and 82.45 ± 9.13 → 179.38 ± 47.83p = 0.026). There was a significant increase in absolute difference of BMD between the SM and reference vertebrae (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between SBRT and cEBRT. There was no increase of BMD in renal lytic SM after radiation therapy (pre-treatment: 85.96 HU ± 19.07; 3 m 92.00 HU ± 21.86 (p = 0.882); 6 m 92.06 HU ± 23.94 (p = 0.902); 9 m 70.44 HU ± 7.45 (p = 0.213); 12 m 98.08 HU ± 11.24 (p = 0.740)). In all other primary tumors, a significant increase of BMD after radiation therapy was demonstrated (p < 0,05).

Conclusion

We conclude that the BMD of lytic SM increases significantly after radiation therapy. Lytic SM of primary renal tumors are the exception; there is no significant remineralization of renal lytic SM after radiation therapy. There is no benefit of SBRT over cEBRT in this remineralization. These findings should be taken into account when deciding on surgery in the potentially unstable group defined by the spinal instability neoplastic score.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology
Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
114
审稿时长
40 days
期刊最新文献
Feasibility and safety of single-fraction sub-ablative radiotherapy with systemic therapy in colorectal cancer patients with ≤ 10 metastases: A multicenter pilot study (NCT05375708) Measuring patient reported outcomes in brachytherapy: Why we should do it and more importantly how Reirradiation − still navigating uncharted waters? The impact of rectal spacers in MR-guided adaptive radiotherapy Maximum disease diameter is associated with outcomes in stage II follicular lymphoma treated with radiation therapy alone
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1