阴道塞药治疗脱垂的自我管理:TOPSY 试验的主要发现

{"title":"阴道塞药治疗脱垂的自我管理:TOPSY 试验的主要发现","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ogrm.2024.05.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Women with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse are offered a choice of conservative and surgical treatment options. Two thirds of women choose a vaginal </span>pessary<span>, a support device inserted in the vagina. This article reports the finding of a randomized controlled trial<span><span> published in 2023 evaluating the cost-effectiveness of self-management of pessary compared to clinic-based care. Women were recruited in 21 centres across the UK and 340 women were randomized to pessary self-management or clinic-based care. The primary outcome measure was prolapse-specific quality of life and secondary outcomes were generic quality of life, </span>pelvic floor<span> symptoms, sexual function, self-efficacy, pessary complications, pessary use and pessary confidence. Participants’ health care resource use was measured. The trial showed that at 18 month follow-up self-management was not associated with better or worse quality of life than clinic-based care. Women in the self-management group reported fewer pessary complications and lower healthcare resource use.</span></span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":53410,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Reproductive Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Self-management of vaginal pessaries for prolapse: the TOPSY trial key findings\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ogrm.2024.05.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span>Women with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse are offered a choice of conservative and surgical treatment options. Two thirds of women choose a vaginal </span>pessary<span>, a support device inserted in the vagina. This article reports the finding of a randomized controlled trial<span><span> published in 2023 evaluating the cost-effectiveness of self-management of pessary compared to clinic-based care. Women were recruited in 21 centres across the UK and 340 women were randomized to pessary self-management or clinic-based care. The primary outcome measure was prolapse-specific quality of life and secondary outcomes were generic quality of life, </span>pelvic floor<span> symptoms, sexual function, self-efficacy, pessary complications, pessary use and pessary confidence. Participants’ health care resource use was measured. The trial showed that at 18 month follow-up self-management was not associated with better or worse quality of life than clinic-based care. Women in the self-management group reported fewer pessary complications and lower healthcare resource use.</span></span></span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53410,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Reproductive Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Reproductive Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751721424000800\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Reproductive Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751721424000800","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有症状的盆腔器官脱垂妇女可以选择保守治疗和手术治疗。三分之二的妇女会选择阴道栓,一种插入阴道的支撑装置。本文报告了 2023 年发表的一项随机对照试验的结果,该试验评估了自我管理膀胱塞与诊所护理相比的成本效益。英国 21 个中心招募了 340 名妇女,并随机分配她们接受泌尿器自我管理或诊所护理。主要结果是脱垂特异性生活质量,次要结果是一般生活质量、盆底症状、性功能、自我效能、栓剂并发症、栓剂使用和栓剂信心。对参与者的医疗资源使用情况进行了测量。试验结果表明,在 18 个月的随访中,与诊所护理相比,自我管理与更好或更差的生活质量并无关联。自我管理组的妇女报告的阴道塞并发症较少,使用的医疗资源也较少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Self-management of vaginal pessaries for prolapse: the TOPSY trial key findings

Women with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse are offered a choice of conservative and surgical treatment options. Two thirds of women choose a vaginal pessary, a support device inserted in the vagina. This article reports the finding of a randomized controlled trial published in 2023 evaluating the cost-effectiveness of self-management of pessary compared to clinic-based care. Women were recruited in 21 centres across the UK and 340 women were randomized to pessary self-management or clinic-based care. The primary outcome measure was prolapse-specific quality of life and secondary outcomes were generic quality of life, pelvic floor symptoms, sexual function, self-efficacy, pessary complications, pessary use and pessary confidence. Participants’ health care resource use was measured. The trial showed that at 18 month follow-up self-management was not associated with better or worse quality of life than clinic-based care. Women in the self-management group reported fewer pessary complications and lower healthcare resource use.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Reproductive Medicine
Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Reproductive Medicine Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Reproductive Medicine is an authoritative and comprehensive resource that provides all obstetricians, gynaecologists and specialists in reproductive medicine with up-to-date reviews on all aspects of obstetrics and gynaecology. Over a 3-year cycle of 36 issues, the emphasis of the journal is on the clear and concise presentation of information of direct clinical relevance to specialists in the field and candidates studying for MRCOG Part II. Each issue contains review articles on obstetric and gynaecological topics. The journal is invaluable for obstetricians, gynaecologists and reproductive medicine specialists, in their role as trainers of MRCOG candidates and in keeping up to date across the broad span of the subject area.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Editorial Board Genomics and hereditary cancer syndromes in women's health: a focus on gynaecological management Self-assessment questions Management of antepartum haemorrhage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1