用刚果红染色检测脂肪垫抽吸活检组织淀粉样蛋白的观察者间一致性和诊断难题

{"title":"用刚果红染色检测脂肪垫抽吸活检组织淀粉样蛋白的观察者间一致性和诊断难题","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jasc.2024.05.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Congo red staining of fat pad fine needle aspiration specimens is a method utilized for evaluation of amyloid deposition. However, these specimens can pose diagnostic challenges for cytopathologists. As part of ongoing internal quality improvement measures, the objective of this study was to evaluate the intradepartmental interobserver agreement of these specimens and to identify factors that affect the variability of the interpretations.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>There were 7 participants, which included 3 trainees, 3 cytopathologists, and 1 cytotechnologist. Each participant reviewed 50 Congo red stained fat pad fine needle aspiration slides. The interpretations were categorized into 3 groups: negative, indeterminate/suspicious, and positive. The participants also noted any interpretation challenges they encountered for each case.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There was only slight interobserver agreement among all participants (κ = 0.133). Stratified by participant group, the interobserver agreement among the trainees was slight bordering on poor (κ = 0.028) and among cytopathologists was fair (κ = 0.249). The highest agreement between 2 observers was between 2 cytopathologists and the level of agreement was moderate bordering on fair (κ = 0.426). There were only 3 cases (6.0%) with full agreement among observers, while in 25 cases (50.0%), there were 2 category differences in interpretations. The primary diagnostic challenge reported by participants was when weak or focal birefringence was encountered as well as cases complicated by poor stain quality and overstaining.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>We found only slight interobserver agreement among all study participants. A major area of challenge was cases with weak birefringence resulting in high variance of interpretation among participants.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38262,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology","volume":"13 5","pages":"Pages 359-366"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interobserver agreement and diagnostic challenges of Congo red staining for amyloid detection on fat pad aspiration biopsies\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jasc.2024.05.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Congo red staining of fat pad fine needle aspiration specimens is a method utilized for evaluation of amyloid deposition. However, these specimens can pose diagnostic challenges for cytopathologists. As part of ongoing internal quality improvement measures, the objective of this study was to evaluate the intradepartmental interobserver agreement of these specimens and to identify factors that affect the variability of the interpretations.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>There were 7 participants, which included 3 trainees, 3 cytopathologists, and 1 cytotechnologist. Each participant reviewed 50 Congo red stained fat pad fine needle aspiration slides. The interpretations were categorized into 3 groups: negative, indeterminate/suspicious, and positive. The participants also noted any interpretation challenges they encountered for each case.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There was only slight interobserver agreement among all participants (κ = 0.133). Stratified by participant group, the interobserver agreement among the trainees was slight bordering on poor (κ = 0.028) and among cytopathologists was fair (κ = 0.249). The highest agreement between 2 observers was between 2 cytopathologists and the level of agreement was moderate bordering on fair (κ = 0.426). There were only 3 cases (6.0%) with full agreement among observers, while in 25 cases (50.0%), there were 2 category differences in interpretations. The primary diagnostic challenge reported by participants was when weak or focal birefringence was encountered as well as cases complicated by poor stain quality and overstaining.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>We found only slight interobserver agreement among all study participants. A major area of challenge was cases with weak birefringence resulting in high variance of interpretation among participants.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38262,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology\",\"volume\":\"13 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 359-366\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213294524000553\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213294524000553","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:对脂肪垫细针抽吸标本进行刚果红染色是一种用于评估淀粉样沉积的方法。然而,这些标本可能会给细胞病理学家的诊断带来挑战。作为正在进行的内部质量改进措施的一部分,本研究的目的是评估这些标本的部门内观察者之间的一致性,并确定影响解释变异性的因素。每位参与者审查了 50 张刚果红染色脂肪垫细针穿刺切片。判读结果分为三组:阴性、不确定/可疑和阳性。结果所有参与者的观察者之间只有轻微的一致性(κ = 0.133)。按参与者组别分类,受训者的观察者之间的一致性略差一点(κ = 0.028),细胞病理学家之间的一致性尚可(κ = 0.249)。两名观察者之间的一致性最高的是两名细胞病理学家之间,一致性水平为中度接近一般(κ = 0.426)。只有 3 个病例(6.0%)的观察者意见完全一致,而在 25 个病例(50.0%)中,观察者的解释存在两类差异。参与者报告的主要诊断难题是遇到弱双折射或局灶性双折射,以及因染色质量差和过度染色而复杂化的病例。主要的挑战在于双折射较弱的病例,导致参与者之间的解释差异很大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Interobserver agreement and diagnostic challenges of Congo red staining for amyloid detection on fat pad aspiration biopsies

Introduction

Congo red staining of fat pad fine needle aspiration specimens is a method utilized for evaluation of amyloid deposition. However, these specimens can pose diagnostic challenges for cytopathologists. As part of ongoing internal quality improvement measures, the objective of this study was to evaluate the intradepartmental interobserver agreement of these specimens and to identify factors that affect the variability of the interpretations.

Materials and methods

There were 7 participants, which included 3 trainees, 3 cytopathologists, and 1 cytotechnologist. Each participant reviewed 50 Congo red stained fat pad fine needle aspiration slides. The interpretations were categorized into 3 groups: negative, indeterminate/suspicious, and positive. The participants also noted any interpretation challenges they encountered for each case.

Results

There was only slight interobserver agreement among all participants (κ = 0.133). Stratified by participant group, the interobserver agreement among the trainees was slight bordering on poor (κ = 0.028) and among cytopathologists was fair (κ = 0.249). The highest agreement between 2 observers was between 2 cytopathologists and the level of agreement was moderate bordering on fair (κ = 0.426). There were only 3 cases (6.0%) with full agreement among observers, while in 25 cases (50.0%), there were 2 category differences in interpretations. The primary diagnostic challenge reported by participants was when weak or focal birefringence was encountered as well as cases complicated by poor stain quality and overstaining.

Conclusions

We found only slight interobserver agreement among all study participants. A major area of challenge was cases with weak birefringence resulting in high variance of interpretation among participants.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology
Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology Medicine-Pathology and Forensic Medicine
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
226
审稿时长
40 days
期刊最新文献
ROSE on small-cell lung carcinoma involvement of mediastinal lymph nodes: Performance evaluation at our institution. Diagnostic FNA biopsies of palpable lesions without ultrasound guidance: a single-center study and narrative review of the literature. Diagnostic performance of the hologic genius digital diagnostics system for low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) ThinPrep papanicolaou tests. Evaluation of HER2-Low breast carcinoma in metastatic settings: a cytological approach to proliferation and survival. Evolving concepts in head and neck cytology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1