急诊科艾滋病毒、丙型肝炎和性传播感染 (STI) 的检测趋势和联合检测模式

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Preventive Medicine Reports Pub Date : 2024-06-08 DOI:10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102777
Hasan Symum , Michelle Van Handel , Amy Sandul , Angela Hutchinson , Clarisse A. Tsang , William S. Pearson , Kevin P. Delaney , Laura A. Cooley , Thomas L. Gift , Karen W. Hoover , William W. Thompson
{"title":"急诊科艾滋病毒、丙型肝炎和性传播感染 (STI) 的检测趋势和联合检测模式","authors":"Hasan Symum ,&nbsp;Michelle Van Handel ,&nbsp;Amy Sandul ,&nbsp;Angela Hutchinson ,&nbsp;Clarisse A. Tsang ,&nbsp;William S. Pearson ,&nbsp;Kevin P. Delaney ,&nbsp;Laura A. Cooley ,&nbsp;Thomas L. Gift ,&nbsp;Karen W. Hoover ,&nbsp;William W. Thompson","doi":"10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102777","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Many underserved populations use Emergency Department (EDs) as primary sources of care, representing an important opportunity to provide infectious disease testing and linkage to care. We explored national ED testing trends and co-testing patterns for HIV, hepatitis C, and sexually transmitted infections (STIs).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We used 2010–2019 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, Nationwide Emergency Department Sample data to estimate ED visit testing rates for HIV, hepatitis C, chlamydia, gonorrhea, and syphilis infections, identified by Current Procedural Terminology codes. Trends and co-testing (visit with tests for &gt; 1 infection) patterns were analyzed by sociodemographic, hospital, and visit characteristics. Trends were evaluated as the average annual percentage change (AAPC) using the Joinpoint Regression.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>During 2010–2019, testing events per 1000 visits (AAPCs) increased for HIV from 1.3 to 4.2 (16.3 %), hepatitis C from 0.4 to 2.2 (25.1 %), chlamydia from 9.1 to 16.0 (6.6 %), gonorrhea from 8.4 to 15.7 (7.4 %), and syphilis from 0.7 to 2.0 (12.9 %). Rate increases varied by several characteristics across infections. The largest AAPC increases were among visits by groups with lower base rate testing in 2010, including persons aged ≥ 65 years (HIV: 36.4 %), with Medicaid (HIV: 43.8 %), in the lowest income quintile (hepatitis C: 36.9 %), living in the West (syphilis: 49.4 %) and with non-emergency diagnoses (hepatitis C: 44.1 %). Co-testing increased significantly for all infections except hepatitis C.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>HIV, hepatitis C, and STI testing increased in EDs during 2010–2019; however, co-testing patterns were inconsistent. Co-testing may improve diagnosis and linkage to care, especially in areas experiencing higher rates of infection.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38066,"journal":{"name":"Preventive Medicine Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221133552400192X/pdfft?md5=b4acaa2a39684b900cbc32a2562a1f50&pid=1-s2.0-S221133552400192X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Testing trends and co-testing patterns for HIV, hepatitis C and sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in Emergency departments\",\"authors\":\"Hasan Symum ,&nbsp;Michelle Van Handel ,&nbsp;Amy Sandul ,&nbsp;Angela Hutchinson ,&nbsp;Clarisse A. Tsang ,&nbsp;William S. Pearson ,&nbsp;Kevin P. Delaney ,&nbsp;Laura A. Cooley ,&nbsp;Thomas L. Gift ,&nbsp;Karen W. Hoover ,&nbsp;William W. Thompson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102777\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Many underserved populations use Emergency Department (EDs) as primary sources of care, representing an important opportunity to provide infectious disease testing and linkage to care. We explored national ED testing trends and co-testing patterns for HIV, hepatitis C, and sexually transmitted infections (STIs).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We used 2010–2019 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, Nationwide Emergency Department Sample data to estimate ED visit testing rates for HIV, hepatitis C, chlamydia, gonorrhea, and syphilis infections, identified by Current Procedural Terminology codes. Trends and co-testing (visit with tests for &gt; 1 infection) patterns were analyzed by sociodemographic, hospital, and visit characteristics. Trends were evaluated as the average annual percentage change (AAPC) using the Joinpoint Regression.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>During 2010–2019, testing events per 1000 visits (AAPCs) increased for HIV from 1.3 to 4.2 (16.3 %), hepatitis C from 0.4 to 2.2 (25.1 %), chlamydia from 9.1 to 16.0 (6.6 %), gonorrhea from 8.4 to 15.7 (7.4 %), and syphilis from 0.7 to 2.0 (12.9 %). Rate increases varied by several characteristics across infections. The largest AAPC increases were among visits by groups with lower base rate testing in 2010, including persons aged ≥ 65 years (HIV: 36.4 %), with Medicaid (HIV: 43.8 %), in the lowest income quintile (hepatitis C: 36.9 %), living in the West (syphilis: 49.4 %) and with non-emergency diagnoses (hepatitis C: 44.1 %). Co-testing increased significantly for all infections except hepatitis C.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>HIV, hepatitis C, and STI testing increased in EDs during 2010–2019; however, co-testing patterns were inconsistent. Co-testing may improve diagnosis and linkage to care, especially in areas experiencing higher rates of infection.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38066,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Preventive Medicine Reports\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221133552400192X/pdfft?md5=b4acaa2a39684b900cbc32a2562a1f50&pid=1-s2.0-S221133552400192X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Preventive Medicine Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221133552400192X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Preventive Medicine Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221133552400192X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景许多服务不足的人群将急诊科(ED)作为主要就医渠道,这为提供传染病检测和就医链接提供了重要机会。我们探讨了全国急诊科艾滋病毒、丙型肝炎和性传播感染(STIs)的检测趋势和联合检测模式。方法我们使用 2010-2019 年医疗成本与利用项目全国急诊科抽样数据来估算急诊科就诊艾滋病毒、丙型肝炎、衣原体、淋病和梅毒感染的检测率,这些数据由当前程序术语代码确定。根据社会人口学、医院和就诊特征对趋势和联合检测(就诊时同时检测一种感染)模式进行了分析。结果在 2010-2019 年期间,每 1000 次就诊中的 HIV 检测事件(AAPCs)从 1.3 增加到 4.2(16.2%)。3% 增加到 4.2 (16.3%),丙型肝炎从 0.4% 增加到 2.2 (25.1%),衣原体从 9.1% 增加到 16.0 (6.6%),淋病从 8.4% 增加到 15.7 (7.4%),梅毒从 0.7% 增加到 2.0 (12.9%)。感染率的增长因不同感染的几个特征而异。在 2010 年基础检测率较低的群体中,AAPC 的增幅最大,包括年龄≥ 65 岁(艾滋病毒:36.4%)、享受医疗补助(艾滋病毒:43.8%)、收入最低的五分之一人口(丙型肝炎:36.9%)、居住在西部地区(梅毒:49.4%)和非急诊诊断(丙型肝炎:44.1%)的人群。除丙型肝炎外,其他所有感染的联合检测率均大幅上升。结论2010-2019年间,急诊室的艾滋病毒、丙型肝炎和性传播感染检测率均有所上升;然而,联合检测模式并不一致。联合检测可能会改善诊断和护理联系,尤其是在感染率较高的地区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Testing trends and co-testing patterns for HIV, hepatitis C and sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in Emergency departments

Background

Many underserved populations use Emergency Department (EDs) as primary sources of care, representing an important opportunity to provide infectious disease testing and linkage to care. We explored national ED testing trends and co-testing patterns for HIV, hepatitis C, and sexually transmitted infections (STIs).

Methods

We used 2010–2019 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, Nationwide Emergency Department Sample data to estimate ED visit testing rates for HIV, hepatitis C, chlamydia, gonorrhea, and syphilis infections, identified by Current Procedural Terminology codes. Trends and co-testing (visit with tests for > 1 infection) patterns were analyzed by sociodemographic, hospital, and visit characteristics. Trends were evaluated as the average annual percentage change (AAPC) using the Joinpoint Regression.

Results

During 2010–2019, testing events per 1000 visits (AAPCs) increased for HIV from 1.3 to 4.2 (16.3 %), hepatitis C from 0.4 to 2.2 (25.1 %), chlamydia from 9.1 to 16.0 (6.6 %), gonorrhea from 8.4 to 15.7 (7.4 %), and syphilis from 0.7 to 2.0 (12.9 %). Rate increases varied by several characteristics across infections. The largest AAPC increases were among visits by groups with lower base rate testing in 2010, including persons aged ≥ 65 years (HIV: 36.4 %), with Medicaid (HIV: 43.8 %), in the lowest income quintile (hepatitis C: 36.9 %), living in the West (syphilis: 49.4 %) and with non-emergency diagnoses (hepatitis C: 44.1 %). Co-testing increased significantly for all infections except hepatitis C.

Conclusions

HIV, hepatitis C, and STI testing increased in EDs during 2010–2019; however, co-testing patterns were inconsistent. Co-testing may improve diagnosis and linkage to care, especially in areas experiencing higher rates of infection.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Preventive Medicine Reports
Preventive Medicine Reports Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
353
期刊最新文献
Prevalence and sociodemographic associations with weight discrimination in early adolescents Editorial Board Advising patients on the use of non-alcoholic beverages that mirror alcohol The prevalence and risk factors associated with hypertension subtypes among ethnic Dai adults in rural China Turning to digital: Examining the relationship between offline healthcare barriers and U.S. older adults’ emotional well-being via online patient–provider communication and perceived quality of care (2017–2020)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1