冠状动脉手术的超声引导经股动脉入路:来自 FAUST 和 UNIVERSAL 试验的汇总学习曲线分析。

IF 6.1 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-18 DOI:10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.123.013817
Marc-André d'Entremont, Arnold H Seto, Sulaiman Alrashidi, Omar Alansari, Bradley Brochu, Samuel Lemaire-Paquette, Laura Heenan, Elizabeth Skuriat, Jessica Tyrwhitt, Michael Raco, Michael B Tsang, Nicholas Valettas, James Velianou, Tej Sheth, Matthew Sibbald, Shamir R Mehta, Natalia Pinilla-Echeverri, Jon-David Schwalm, Madhu K Natarajan, Mazen Abu-Fadel, Andrew Kelly, Elie Akl, Sarah Tawadros, Walaa Faidi, John Bauer, Rachel Moxham, James Nkurunziza, Gustavo Dutra, Jose Winter, Étienne L Couture, Sanjit S Jolly
{"title":"冠状动脉手术的超声引导经股动脉入路:来自 FAUST 和 UNIVERSAL 试验的汇总学习曲线分析。","authors":"Marc-André d'Entremont, Arnold H Seto, Sulaiman Alrashidi, Omar Alansari, Bradley Brochu, Samuel Lemaire-Paquette, Laura Heenan, Elizabeth Skuriat, Jessica Tyrwhitt, Michael Raco, Michael B Tsang, Nicholas Valettas, James Velianou, Tej Sheth, Matthew Sibbald, Shamir R Mehta, Natalia Pinilla-Echeverri, Jon-David Schwalm, Madhu K Natarajan, Mazen Abu-Fadel, Andrew Kelly, Elie Akl, Sarah Tawadros, Walaa Faidi, John Bauer, Rachel Moxham, James Nkurunziza, Gustavo Dutra, Jose Winter, Étienne L Couture, Sanjit S Jolly","doi":"10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.123.013817","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The learning curve for new operators performing ultrasound-guided transfemoral access (TFA) remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a pooled analysis of the FAUST (Femoral Arterial Access With Ultrasound Trial) and UNIVERSAL (Routine Ultrasound Guidance for Vascular Access for Cardiac Procedures) trials, both multicenter randomized controlled trials of 1:1 ultrasound-guided versus non-ultrasound-guided TFA for coronary procedures. Outcomes included the composite of major bleeding or vascular complications and successful common femoral artery cannulation. Participants were stratified by the operators' accrued case volume. We used adjusted repeated-measurement logistic regression, with random intercepts for operator clustering, for comparison against the non-ultrasound-guided TFA group and to model the learning curve.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The FAUST and UNIVERSAL trials randomized a total of 1624 patients, of which 810 were randomized to non-ultrasound-guided TFA and 814 to ultrasound-guided TFA (cases 1-10, 391; 11-20, 183; and >20, 240). Participants who had operators who performed >20 ultrasound-guided TFAs had a decreased risk for the primary end point (5/240 [2.1%] versus 64/810 [7.9%]; adjusted odds ratio, 0.26 [95% CI, 0.09-0.61]) compared with non-ultrasound-guided TFA. Operators who performed >20 ultrasound-guided procedures had increased odds of successfully cannulating the common femoral artery (224/246 [91.1%] versus 327/382 [85.6%]; adjusted odds ratio, 1.76 [95% CI, 1.08-2.89]) compared with non-ultrasound-guided TFA. The learning curve plots demonstrated growing competence with increasing accrued cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>New operators should perform at least 20 ultrasound-guided TFA to decrease access site complications and increase proper cannulation compared with non-ultrasound-guided TFA. Additional accrued cases may lead to increased proficiency. Training programs should consider these findings in the transradial era.</p>","PeriodicalId":10330,"journal":{"name":"Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ultrasound-Guided Transfemoral Access for Coronary Procedures: A Pooled Learning Curve Analysis From the FAUST and UNIVERSAL Trials.\",\"authors\":\"Marc-André d'Entremont, Arnold H Seto, Sulaiman Alrashidi, Omar Alansari, Bradley Brochu, Samuel Lemaire-Paquette, Laura Heenan, Elizabeth Skuriat, Jessica Tyrwhitt, Michael Raco, Michael B Tsang, Nicholas Valettas, James Velianou, Tej Sheth, Matthew Sibbald, Shamir R Mehta, Natalia Pinilla-Echeverri, Jon-David Schwalm, Madhu K Natarajan, Mazen Abu-Fadel, Andrew Kelly, Elie Akl, Sarah Tawadros, Walaa Faidi, John Bauer, Rachel Moxham, James Nkurunziza, Gustavo Dutra, Jose Winter, Étienne L Couture, Sanjit S Jolly\",\"doi\":\"10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.123.013817\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The learning curve for new operators performing ultrasound-guided transfemoral access (TFA) remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a pooled analysis of the FAUST (Femoral Arterial Access With Ultrasound Trial) and UNIVERSAL (Routine Ultrasound Guidance for Vascular Access for Cardiac Procedures) trials, both multicenter randomized controlled trials of 1:1 ultrasound-guided versus non-ultrasound-guided TFA for coronary procedures. Outcomes included the composite of major bleeding or vascular complications and successful common femoral artery cannulation. Participants were stratified by the operators' accrued case volume. We used adjusted repeated-measurement logistic regression, with random intercepts for operator clustering, for comparison against the non-ultrasound-guided TFA group and to model the learning curve.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The FAUST and UNIVERSAL trials randomized a total of 1624 patients, of which 810 were randomized to non-ultrasound-guided TFA and 814 to ultrasound-guided TFA (cases 1-10, 391; 11-20, 183; and >20, 240). Participants who had operators who performed >20 ultrasound-guided TFAs had a decreased risk for the primary end point (5/240 [2.1%] versus 64/810 [7.9%]; adjusted odds ratio, 0.26 [95% CI, 0.09-0.61]) compared with non-ultrasound-guided TFA. Operators who performed >20 ultrasound-guided procedures had increased odds of successfully cannulating the common femoral artery (224/246 [91.1%] versus 327/382 [85.6%]; adjusted odds ratio, 1.76 [95% CI, 1.08-2.89]) compared with non-ultrasound-guided TFA. The learning curve plots demonstrated growing competence with increasing accrued cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>New operators should perform at least 20 ultrasound-guided TFA to decrease access site complications and increase proper cannulation compared with non-ultrasound-guided TFA. Additional accrued cases may lead to increased proficiency. Training programs should consider these findings in the transradial era.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10330,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.123.013817\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.123.013817","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:超声引导经股动脉入路(TFA)新操作者的学习曲线仍不确定:我们对FAUST(超声引导股动脉通路试验)和UNIVERSAL(心脏手术血管通路常规超声引导)试验进行了汇总分析,这两项试验都是冠状动脉手术中1:1超声引导与非超声引导TFA的多中心随机对照试验。试验结果包括大出血或血管并发症和股总动脉插管成功率。参与者按操作者的累计病例量进行分层。我们使用了调整后的重复测量逻辑回归,并对操作者聚类进行了随机截距,以与非超声引导 TFA 组进行比较,并建立了学习曲线模型:FAUST和UNIVERSAL试验共对1624名患者进行了随机分组,其中810人被随机分配到非超声引导TFA组,814人被随机分配到超声引导TFA组(1-10例,391人;11-20例,183人;>20例,240人)。与非超声引导 TFA 相比,由超声引导 TFA 超过 20 例的操作者操作的参与者发生主要终点的风险较低(5/240 [2.1%] 对 64/810 [7.9%];调整后的几率比为 0.26 [95% CI,0.09-0.61])。与非超声引导的 TFA 相比,在超声引导下进行过 >20 次手术的操作者成功插管股总动脉的几率更高(224/246 [91.1%] 对 327/382 [85.6%];调整后的几率比为 1.76 [95% CI, 1.08-2.89])。学习曲线图显示,随着累积病例的增加,能力也在不断提高:结论:与非超声引导 TFA 相比,新操作者应至少进行 20 次超声引导 TFA,以减少入路部位并发症并提高正确插管率。累积更多病例可提高熟练程度。在经桡动脉时代,培训计划应考虑这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ultrasound-Guided Transfemoral Access for Coronary Procedures: A Pooled Learning Curve Analysis From the FAUST and UNIVERSAL Trials.

Background: The learning curve for new operators performing ultrasound-guided transfemoral access (TFA) remains uncertain.

Methods: We performed a pooled analysis of the FAUST (Femoral Arterial Access With Ultrasound Trial) and UNIVERSAL (Routine Ultrasound Guidance for Vascular Access for Cardiac Procedures) trials, both multicenter randomized controlled trials of 1:1 ultrasound-guided versus non-ultrasound-guided TFA for coronary procedures. Outcomes included the composite of major bleeding or vascular complications and successful common femoral artery cannulation. Participants were stratified by the operators' accrued case volume. We used adjusted repeated-measurement logistic regression, with random intercepts for operator clustering, for comparison against the non-ultrasound-guided TFA group and to model the learning curve.

Results: The FAUST and UNIVERSAL trials randomized a total of 1624 patients, of which 810 were randomized to non-ultrasound-guided TFA and 814 to ultrasound-guided TFA (cases 1-10, 391; 11-20, 183; and >20, 240). Participants who had operators who performed >20 ultrasound-guided TFAs had a decreased risk for the primary end point (5/240 [2.1%] versus 64/810 [7.9%]; adjusted odds ratio, 0.26 [95% CI, 0.09-0.61]) compared with non-ultrasound-guided TFA. Operators who performed >20 ultrasound-guided procedures had increased odds of successfully cannulating the common femoral artery (224/246 [91.1%] versus 327/382 [85.6%]; adjusted odds ratio, 1.76 [95% CI, 1.08-2.89]) compared with non-ultrasound-guided TFA. The learning curve plots demonstrated growing competence with increasing accrued cases.

Conclusions: New operators should perform at least 20 ultrasound-guided TFA to decrease access site complications and increase proper cannulation compared with non-ultrasound-guided TFA. Additional accrued cases may lead to increased proficiency. Training programs should consider these findings in the transradial era.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions
Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
1.80%
发文量
221
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions, an American Heart Association journal, focuses on interventional techniques pertaining to coronary artery disease, structural heart disease, and vascular disease, with priority placed on original research and on randomized trials and large registry studies. In addition, pharmacological, diagnostic, and pathophysiological aspects of interventional cardiology are given special attention in this online-only journal.
期刊最新文献
Stroke Prevention With Prophylactic Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion in Cardiac Surgery Patients Without Atrial Fibrillation: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized and Propensity-Score Studies. Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion in Patients Without Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: The Evidence Is Mounting. Microvascular Resistance Reserve Predicts Myocardial Ischemia and Response to Therapy in Patients With Angina and Nonobstructive Coronary Arteries. Enhancing Guidewire Efficacy for Trans-radial Access: The EAGER Randomized Controlled Trial. Correction to: Consensus Statement on the Management of Nonthrombotic Iliac Vein Lesions From the VIVA Foundation, the American Venous Forum, and the American Vein and Lymphatic Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1