免疫球蛋白 A 肾病患者接受扁桃体切除术联合类固醇脉冲疗法与单纯扁桃体切除术的临床疗效比较:一项回顾性观察研究。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Clinical and Experimental Nephrology Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-18 DOI:10.1007/s10157-024-02527-1
Ryosuke Sato, Risa Wakisaka, Hiroki Komatsuda, Hidekiyo Yamaki, Kenzo Ohara, Takumi Kumai, Kan Kishibe, Naoki Nakagawa, Tatsuya Hayashi, Miki Takahara
{"title":"免疫球蛋白 A 肾病患者接受扁桃体切除术联合类固醇脉冲疗法与单纯扁桃体切除术的临床疗效比较:一项回顾性观察研究。","authors":"Ryosuke Sato, Risa Wakisaka, Hiroki Komatsuda, Hidekiyo Yamaki, Kenzo Ohara, Takumi Kumai, Kan Kishibe, Naoki Nakagawa, Tatsuya Hayashi, Miki Takahara","doi":"10.1007/s10157-024-02527-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tonsillectomy with steroid pulse therapy (TSP) and tonsillectomy monotherapy (T) have improved the prognosis of patients with immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN). However, a consensus has not been reached on the best treatment for these patients. This study aimed to compare the efficacies of TSP and T.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data of patients with IgAN who received TSP or T were retrospectively analyzed. The exclusion criterion was a serum creatinine level > 1.5 mg/dL. The clinical remission and renal survival rates were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients were divided into groups based on the treatment method: the TSP (n = 82) and T groups (n = 41). No significant differences were observed in patient characteristics, except for the observation period (TSP: 60 months, T: 113 months). The log-rank test revealed that the clinical remission rate was significantly higher in the TSP group than in the T group (p < 0.05). The superiority of TSP was also observed in the urinary protein excretion (> / = or < 1 g/day) of the two subgroups. According to the Cox proportional-hazards model, the treatment method and daily urinary protein extraction were independent factors affecting clinical remission. The 10-year renal survival rates in the TSP and T groups were 100% and 92.5%, respectively. The log-rank test revealed a tendency for a higher renal survival rate in the TSP group than in the T group (p = 0.09).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The clinical remission rate was significantly higher with TSP than with T, regardless of urinary protein levels. TSP tended to have a better renal survival rate than T.</p>","PeriodicalId":10349,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":"1254-1260"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison of the clinical efficacy of tonsillectomy with steroid pulse therapy and tonsillectomy therapy alone for patients with immunoglobulin A nephropathy: a retrospective observational study.\",\"authors\":\"Ryosuke Sato, Risa Wakisaka, Hiroki Komatsuda, Hidekiyo Yamaki, Kenzo Ohara, Takumi Kumai, Kan Kishibe, Naoki Nakagawa, Tatsuya Hayashi, Miki Takahara\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10157-024-02527-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tonsillectomy with steroid pulse therapy (TSP) and tonsillectomy monotherapy (T) have improved the prognosis of patients with immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN). However, a consensus has not been reached on the best treatment for these patients. This study aimed to compare the efficacies of TSP and T.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data of patients with IgAN who received TSP or T were retrospectively analyzed. The exclusion criterion was a serum creatinine level > 1.5 mg/dL. The clinical remission and renal survival rates were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients were divided into groups based on the treatment method: the TSP (n = 82) and T groups (n = 41). No significant differences were observed in patient characteristics, except for the observation period (TSP: 60 months, T: 113 months). The log-rank test revealed that the clinical remission rate was significantly higher in the TSP group than in the T group (p < 0.05). The superiority of TSP was also observed in the urinary protein excretion (> / = or < 1 g/day) of the two subgroups. According to the Cox proportional-hazards model, the treatment method and daily urinary protein extraction were independent factors affecting clinical remission. The 10-year renal survival rates in the TSP and T groups were 100% and 92.5%, respectively. The log-rank test revealed a tendency for a higher renal survival rate in the TSP group than in the T group (p = 0.09).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The clinical remission rate was significantly higher with TSP than with T, regardless of urinary protein levels. TSP tended to have a better renal survival rate than T.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Experimental Nephrology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1254-1260\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Experimental Nephrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10157-024-02527-1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10157-024-02527-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:扁桃体切除术联合类固醇脉冲疗法(TSP)和扁桃体切除术单一疗法(T)改善了免疫球蛋白 A 肾病(IgAN)患者的预后。然而,对于这些患者的最佳治疗方法尚未达成共识。本研究旨在比较 TSP 和 T 的疗效:回顾性分析了接受 TSP 或 T 治疗的 IgAN 患者的数据。排除标准是血清肌酐水平大于 1.5 mg/dL。比较了临床缓解率和肾脏存活率:根据治疗方法将患者分为两组:TSP 组(82 人)和 T 组(41 人)。除观察期(TSP:60 个月,T:113 个月)外,患者特征无明显差异。对数秩检验显示,TSP 组的临床缓解率明显高于 T 组(p / = 或 结论:TSP 组的临床缓解率明显高于 T 组(p / = 或 结论:TSP 组的临床缓解率明显高于 T 组):无论尿蛋白水平如何,TSP 的临床缓解率都明显高于 T。TSP的肾脏存活率往往高于T。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A comparison of the clinical efficacy of tonsillectomy with steroid pulse therapy and tonsillectomy therapy alone for patients with immunoglobulin A nephropathy: a retrospective observational study.

Background: Tonsillectomy with steroid pulse therapy (TSP) and tonsillectomy monotherapy (T) have improved the prognosis of patients with immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN). However, a consensus has not been reached on the best treatment for these patients. This study aimed to compare the efficacies of TSP and T.

Methods: Data of patients with IgAN who received TSP or T were retrospectively analyzed. The exclusion criterion was a serum creatinine level > 1.5 mg/dL. The clinical remission and renal survival rates were compared.

Results: Patients were divided into groups based on the treatment method: the TSP (n = 82) and T groups (n = 41). No significant differences were observed in patient characteristics, except for the observation period (TSP: 60 months, T: 113 months). The log-rank test revealed that the clinical remission rate was significantly higher in the TSP group than in the T group (p < 0.05). The superiority of TSP was also observed in the urinary protein excretion (> / = or < 1 g/day) of the two subgroups. According to the Cox proportional-hazards model, the treatment method and daily urinary protein extraction were independent factors affecting clinical remission. The 10-year renal survival rates in the TSP and T groups were 100% and 92.5%, respectively. The log-rank test revealed a tendency for a higher renal survival rate in the TSP group than in the T group (p = 0.09).

Conclusion: The clinical remission rate was significantly higher with TSP than with T, regardless of urinary protein levels. TSP tended to have a better renal survival rate than T.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical and Experimental Nephrology
Clinical and Experimental Nephrology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
135
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Experimental Nephrology is a peer-reviewed monthly journal, officially published by the Japanese Society of Nephrology (JSN) to provide an international forum for the discussion of research and issues relating to the study of nephrology. Out of respect for the founders of the JSN, the title of this journal uses the term “nephrology,” a word created and brought into use with the establishment of the JSN (Japanese Journal of Nephrology, Vol. 2, No. 1, 1960). The journal publishes articles on all aspects of nephrology, including basic, experimental, and clinical research, so as to share the latest research findings and ideas not only with members of the JSN, but with all researchers who wish to contribute to a better understanding of recent advances in nephrology. The journal is unique in that it introduces to an international readership original reports from Japan and also the clinical standards discussed and agreed by JSN.
期刊最新文献
Longitudinal impact of extended-hours hemodialysis with a liberalized diet on nutritional status and survival outcomes: findings from the LIBERTY cohort. Exploring factors associated with Kidney Disease Quality of Life in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease: the Reach-J CKD cohort study. Correction: Adolescents and parents' knowledge of chronic kidney disease: the potential of school-based education. Pathophysiology, symptoms, outcomes, and evaluation of hyponatremia: comprehension and best clinical practice. Treatment of hyponatremia: comprehension and best clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1