{"title":"新型无酒精防腐剂溶液与传统前缀法在血清体液涂片质量方面的比较验证。","authors":"Anagha Ambalaparambil MSc (MLT), Prasanna Venkadesa Perumal MSc (MLT), Debasis Gochhait MD, DNB, Neelaiah Siddaraju MD","doi":"10.1002/dc.25369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>We describe a novel alcohol-free preservative composed of glucose, mannitol, disodium hydrogen orthophosphate, thymol, and distilled water (glucose-mannitol–disodium dihydrogen orhtophosphate-thymol [GMDT] preservative) in appropriate proportion as an alternative to alcohol prefixation (APF) of body fluids.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To assess the cytomorphologic preservation and staining quality of serous body fluid smears generated by GMDT preservative and compare it with smears processed by standard 50% APF.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methodology</h3>\n \n <p>The study comprised 151 effusion samples. Each sample was equally divided into four tubes. Equal volumes of APF and GMDT preservatives were added to the first two tubes and left at room temperature for 24 h. Similarly, the corresponding preservatives were added to the third and fourth tubes and stored for 48 h. Two smears were prepared from the centrifuged sediments of each tube (all four tubes) and stained with May-Grünwald Giemsa and Papanicolaou (Pap) stains. Using a three-tiered scoring system, the smear examination was blinded to assess the extent of cellular preservation and the staining quality by two cytotechnologists and two cytopathologists. Statistical analysis was performed by STATA 16.0.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Samples processed with the GMDT preservative at 24 h showed better cytoplasmic preservation and smear background, while nuclear features and staining quality showed no difference between the two preservatives. Mild cytoplasmic and nuclear degenerative changes were noted with the GMDT at 48 h, while all four parameters remained similar with APF at 24 and 48 h.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The newly developed alcohol-free, GMDT preservative, could be a feasible and cost-effective alternative to 50% APF, preferably when samples are processed within 24 h.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11349,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic Cytopathology","volume":"52 11","pages":"633-642"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of a novel alcohol-free preservative solution in comparison with conventional prefixation on quality of serous body fluid smears\",\"authors\":\"Anagha Ambalaparambil MSc (MLT), Prasanna Venkadesa Perumal MSc (MLT), Debasis Gochhait MD, DNB, Neelaiah Siddaraju MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/dc.25369\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>We describe a novel alcohol-free preservative composed of glucose, mannitol, disodium hydrogen orthophosphate, thymol, and distilled water (glucose-mannitol–disodium dihydrogen orhtophosphate-thymol [GMDT] preservative) in appropriate proportion as an alternative to alcohol prefixation (APF) of body fluids.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>To assess the cytomorphologic preservation and staining quality of serous body fluid smears generated by GMDT preservative and compare it with smears processed by standard 50% APF.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methodology</h3>\\n \\n <p>The study comprised 151 effusion samples. Each sample was equally divided into four tubes. Equal volumes of APF and GMDT preservatives were added to the first two tubes and left at room temperature for 24 h. Similarly, the corresponding preservatives were added to the third and fourth tubes and stored for 48 h. Two smears were prepared from the centrifuged sediments of each tube (all four tubes) and stained with May-Grünwald Giemsa and Papanicolaou (Pap) stains. Using a three-tiered scoring system, the smear examination was blinded to assess the extent of cellular preservation and the staining quality by two cytotechnologists and two cytopathologists. Statistical analysis was performed by STATA 16.0.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Samples processed with the GMDT preservative at 24 h showed better cytoplasmic preservation and smear background, while nuclear features and staining quality showed no difference between the two preservatives. Mild cytoplasmic and nuclear degenerative changes were noted with the GMDT at 48 h, while all four parameters remained similar with APF at 24 and 48 h.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>The newly developed alcohol-free, GMDT preservative, could be a feasible and cost-effective alternative to 50% APF, preferably when samples are processed within 24 h.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diagnostic Cytopathology\",\"volume\":\"52 11\",\"pages\":\"633-642\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diagnostic Cytopathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/dc.25369\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostic Cytopathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/dc.25369","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Validation of a novel alcohol-free preservative solution in comparison with conventional prefixation on quality of serous body fluid smears
Background
We describe a novel alcohol-free preservative composed of glucose, mannitol, disodium hydrogen orthophosphate, thymol, and distilled water (glucose-mannitol–disodium dihydrogen orhtophosphate-thymol [GMDT] preservative) in appropriate proportion as an alternative to alcohol prefixation (APF) of body fluids.
Objectives
To assess the cytomorphologic preservation and staining quality of serous body fluid smears generated by GMDT preservative and compare it with smears processed by standard 50% APF.
Methodology
The study comprised 151 effusion samples. Each sample was equally divided into four tubes. Equal volumes of APF and GMDT preservatives were added to the first two tubes and left at room temperature for 24 h. Similarly, the corresponding preservatives were added to the third and fourth tubes and stored for 48 h. Two smears were prepared from the centrifuged sediments of each tube (all four tubes) and stained with May-Grünwald Giemsa and Papanicolaou (Pap) stains. Using a three-tiered scoring system, the smear examination was blinded to assess the extent of cellular preservation and the staining quality by two cytotechnologists and two cytopathologists. Statistical analysis was performed by STATA 16.0.
Results
Samples processed with the GMDT preservative at 24 h showed better cytoplasmic preservation and smear background, while nuclear features and staining quality showed no difference between the two preservatives. Mild cytoplasmic and nuclear degenerative changes were noted with the GMDT at 48 h, while all four parameters remained similar with APF at 24 and 48 h.
Conclusions
The newly developed alcohol-free, GMDT preservative, could be a feasible and cost-effective alternative to 50% APF, preferably when samples are processed within 24 h.
期刊介绍:
Diagnostic Cytopathology is intended to provide a forum for the exchange of information in the field of cytopathology, with special emphasis on the practical, clinical aspects of the discipline. The editors invite original scientific articles, as well as special review articles, feature articles, and letters to the editor, from laboratory professionals engaged in the practice of cytopathology. Manuscripts are accepted for publication on the basis of scientific merit, practical significance, and suitability for publication in a journal dedicated to this discipline. Original articles can be considered only with the understanding that they have never been published before and that they have not been submitted for simultaneous review to another publication.