社会工作人员配备干预对农村和高度农村退伍军人获得社会工作服务的不同影响:一项队列研究。

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Health Services Research Pub Date : 2024-06-17 DOI:10.1111/1475-6773.14327
Andrew N. Honken BS, Christopher W. Halladay ScM, Lisa E. Wootton LCSW, Alita R. Harmon LCSW, Cassandra L. Hua PhD, James L. Rudolph MD, Portia Y. Cornell PhD
{"title":"社会工作人员配备干预对农村和高度农村退伍军人获得社会工作服务的不同影响:一项队列研究。","authors":"Andrew N. Honken BS,&nbsp;Christopher W. Halladay ScM,&nbsp;Lisa E. Wootton LCSW,&nbsp;Alita R. Harmon LCSW,&nbsp;Cassandra L. Hua PhD,&nbsp;James L. Rudolph MD,&nbsp;Portia Y. Cornell PhD","doi":"10.1111/1475-6773.14327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To evaluate the impact on rural Veterans' access to social work services of a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) national program to increase social work staffing, by Veterans' rurality, race, and complex care needs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Data Sources and Study Setting</h3>\n \n <p>Data obtained from VA Corporate Data Warehouse, including sites that participated in the social work program between October 1, 2016 and September 30, 2021.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Study Design</h3>\n \n <p>The study outcome was monthly number of Veterans per 1000 individuals with 1+ social work encounters. We used difference-in-differences to estimate the program effect on urban, rural, and highly rural Veterans. Among rural and highly rural Veterans, we stratified by race (American Indian or Alaskan Native, Asian, Black, Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, and White) and complex care needs (homelessness, high hospitalization risk, and dementia).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Data Collection</h3>\n \n <p>We defined a cohort of 740,669 Veterans (32,434,001 monthly observations) who received primary care at a participating site.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Principal Findings</h3>\n \n <p>Average monthly social work use was 8.7 Veterans per 1000 individuals. The program increased access by 49% (4.3 per 1000; 95% confidence interval, 2.2–6.3). Rural Veterans' social work access increased by 57% (5.0; 3.6–6.3). Among rural/highly rural Veterans, the program increased social work access for those with high hospitalization risk by 63% (24.5; 18.2–30.9), and for Veterans experiencing homelessness, 35% (13.4; 5.2–21.7). By race, the program increased access for Black Veterans by 53% (6.1; 2.1–10.2) and for Asian Veterans by 82% (5.1; 2.2–7.9).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>At rural VA primary care sites with social work staffing below recommended levels, Black and Asian Veterans and those experiencing homelessness and high hospitalization risk may have unmet needs warranting social work services.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55065,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Research","volume":"59 S2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11540563/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differential effects of a social work staffing intervention on social work access among rural and highly rural Veterans: A cohort study\",\"authors\":\"Andrew N. Honken BS,&nbsp;Christopher W. Halladay ScM,&nbsp;Lisa E. Wootton LCSW,&nbsp;Alita R. Harmon LCSW,&nbsp;Cassandra L. Hua PhD,&nbsp;James L. Rudolph MD,&nbsp;Portia Y. Cornell PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1475-6773.14327\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>To evaluate the impact on rural Veterans' access to social work services of a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) national program to increase social work staffing, by Veterans' rurality, race, and complex care needs.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Data Sources and Study Setting</h3>\\n \\n <p>Data obtained from VA Corporate Data Warehouse, including sites that participated in the social work program between October 1, 2016 and September 30, 2021.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Study Design</h3>\\n \\n <p>The study outcome was monthly number of Veterans per 1000 individuals with 1+ social work encounters. We used difference-in-differences to estimate the program effect on urban, rural, and highly rural Veterans. Among rural and highly rural Veterans, we stratified by race (American Indian or Alaskan Native, Asian, Black, Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, and White) and complex care needs (homelessness, high hospitalization risk, and dementia).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Data Collection</h3>\\n \\n <p>We defined a cohort of 740,669 Veterans (32,434,001 monthly observations) who received primary care at a participating site.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Principal Findings</h3>\\n \\n <p>Average monthly social work use was 8.7 Veterans per 1000 individuals. The program increased access by 49% (4.3 per 1000; 95% confidence interval, 2.2–6.3). Rural Veterans' social work access increased by 57% (5.0; 3.6–6.3). Among rural/highly rural Veterans, the program increased social work access for those with high hospitalization risk by 63% (24.5; 18.2–30.9), and for Veterans experiencing homelessness, 35% (13.4; 5.2–21.7). By race, the program increased access for Black Veterans by 53% (6.1; 2.1–10.2) and for Asian Veterans by 82% (5.1; 2.2–7.9).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>At rural VA primary care sites with social work staffing below recommended levels, Black and Asian Veterans and those experiencing homelessness and high hospitalization risk may have unmet needs warranting social work services.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55065,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Services Research\",\"volume\":\"59 S2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11540563/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Services Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1475-6773.14327\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1475-6773.14327","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:评估退伍军人事务部(VA)增加社会工作人员配备的国家计划对农村退伍军人获得社会工作服务的影响,按退伍军人的农村、种族和复杂护理需求进行分类:数据来自退伍军人事务部企业数据仓库,包括 2016 年 10 月 1 日至 2021 年 9 月 30 日期间参与社会工作计划的地点:研究结果为每月每 1000 人中有 1 次以上社工接触的退伍军人人数。我们采用差分法来估算该项目对城市、农村和高度农村退伍军人的影响。在农村和高度农村退伍军人中,我们按种族(美国印第安人或阿拉斯加原住民、亚洲人、黑人、夏威夷原住民或其他太平洋岛民以及白人)和复杂护理需求(无家可归、高住院风险和痴呆症)进行了分层:我们定义了一个由 740,669 名退伍军人组成的队列(每月观察人数为 32,434,001 人),他们在参与地点接受初级护理:平均每月每 1000 人中有 8.7 名退伍军人使用社工服务。该计划将使用率提高了 49%(每 1000 人中有 4.3 人;95% 置信区间为 2.2-6.3)。农村退伍军人的社会工作使用率提高了 57%(5.0;3.6-6.3)。在农村/高度农村退伍军人中,该计划使住院风险高的退伍军人获得的社工服务增加了 63% (24.5; 18.2-30.9),使无家可归的退伍军人获得的社工服务增加了 35% (13.4; 5.2-21.7)。按种族划分,该计划使黑人退伍军人的就医率提高了 53% (6.1; 2.1-10.2),亚裔退伍军人的就医率提高了 82% (5.1; 2.2-7.9):结论:在退伍军人事务部的农村初级医疗点,社工人员配备低于建议水平,黑人和亚裔退伍军人以及那些无家可归和住院风险高的退伍军人可能有未得到满足的需求,需要社工服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Differential effects of a social work staffing intervention on social work access among rural and highly rural Veterans: A cohort study

Objective

To evaluate the impact on rural Veterans' access to social work services of a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) national program to increase social work staffing, by Veterans' rurality, race, and complex care needs.

Data Sources and Study Setting

Data obtained from VA Corporate Data Warehouse, including sites that participated in the social work program between October 1, 2016 and September 30, 2021.

Study Design

The study outcome was monthly number of Veterans per 1000 individuals with 1+ social work encounters. We used difference-in-differences to estimate the program effect on urban, rural, and highly rural Veterans. Among rural and highly rural Veterans, we stratified by race (American Indian or Alaskan Native, Asian, Black, Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, and White) and complex care needs (homelessness, high hospitalization risk, and dementia).

Data Collection

We defined a cohort of 740,669 Veterans (32,434,001 monthly observations) who received primary care at a participating site.

Principal Findings

Average monthly social work use was 8.7 Veterans per 1000 individuals. The program increased access by 49% (4.3 per 1000; 95% confidence interval, 2.2–6.3). Rural Veterans' social work access increased by 57% (5.0; 3.6–6.3). Among rural/highly rural Veterans, the program increased social work access for those with high hospitalization risk by 63% (24.5; 18.2–30.9), and for Veterans experiencing homelessness, 35% (13.4; 5.2–21.7). By race, the program increased access for Black Veterans by 53% (6.1; 2.1–10.2) and for Asian Veterans by 82% (5.1; 2.2–7.9).

Conclusions

At rural VA primary care sites with social work staffing below recommended levels, Black and Asian Veterans and those experiencing homelessness and high hospitalization risk may have unmet needs warranting social work services.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Services Research
Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
193
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Services Research (HSR) is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal that provides researchers and public and private policymakers with the latest research findings, methods, and concepts related to the financing, organization, delivery, evaluation, and outcomes of health services. Rated as one of the top journals in the fields of health policy and services and health care administration, HSR publishes outstanding articles reporting the findings of original investigations that expand knowledge and understanding of the wide-ranging field of health care and that will help to improve the health of individuals and communities.
期刊最新文献
Instrumental variables in the cost of illness featuring type 2 diabetes. Evaluating a predictive model of avoidable hospital events for race- and sex-based bias. Addressing social and health needs in health care: Characterizing case managers' work to address patient-defined goals. Changes in healthcare costs and utilization for Medicaid recipients who received supportive housing through a payer-community-based housing partnership. Exploring the health impacts of climate change: Challenges and considerations for health services research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1