拥抱以证据为基础的败血症新思想范式。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING Clinical Nurse Specialist Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1097/NUR.0000000000000828
Lindsay Richardson, Julie-Kathryn Graham
{"title":"拥抱以证据为基础的败血症新思想范式。","authors":"Lindsay Richardson, Julie-Kathryn Graham","doi":"10.1097/NUR.0000000000000828","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>In 1991, sepsis was first defined by the Society of Critical Care Medicine as the systemic inflammatory response syndrome, in the presence of infection. Systemic inflammatory response syndrome is an adaptive host response to infection, as well as to other insults like trauma and stress. Research pertaining to sepsis was guided by this adaptive definition for 25 years. After established guidelines for sepsis management were challenged in 2014, sepsis was redefined in 2016 as a dysregulated host response to infection. However, there still remains no consensus on which immunologic or metabolic mechanisms have become dysregulated. We sought to examine sepsis literature published after the 2016 consensus definition and compare it to the original systemic inflammatory response syndrome paradigm proposed in 1991. The purpose of this intensive analysis was to recommend a new sepsis archetype, with consideration to dysregulated immunologic and metabolic mechanisms that have recently been identified in sepsis. Nurses and other clinicians must shift their thought paradigm toward an evidence-based dysregulated model, in order to improve on sepsis recognition and management.</p>","PeriodicalId":55249,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Nurse Specialist","volume":"38 4","pages":"171-174"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Embracing a New Evidence-Based Thought Paradigm of Sepsis.\",\"authors\":\"Lindsay Richardson, Julie-Kathryn Graham\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/NUR.0000000000000828\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>In 1991, sepsis was first defined by the Society of Critical Care Medicine as the systemic inflammatory response syndrome, in the presence of infection. Systemic inflammatory response syndrome is an adaptive host response to infection, as well as to other insults like trauma and stress. Research pertaining to sepsis was guided by this adaptive definition for 25 years. After established guidelines for sepsis management were challenged in 2014, sepsis was redefined in 2016 as a dysregulated host response to infection. However, there still remains no consensus on which immunologic or metabolic mechanisms have become dysregulated. We sought to examine sepsis literature published after the 2016 consensus definition and compare it to the original systemic inflammatory response syndrome paradigm proposed in 1991. The purpose of this intensive analysis was to recommend a new sepsis archetype, with consideration to dysregulated immunologic and metabolic mechanisms that have recently been identified in sepsis. Nurses and other clinicians must shift their thought paradigm toward an evidence-based dysregulated model, in order to improve on sepsis recognition and management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55249,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Nurse Specialist\",\"volume\":\"38 4\",\"pages\":\"171-174\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Nurse Specialist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/NUR.0000000000000828\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Nurse Specialist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NUR.0000000000000828","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:1991 年,重症医学会首次将败血症定义为存在感染的全身炎症反应综合征。全身炎症反应综合征是宿主对感染以及创伤和压力等其他损伤的一种适应性反应。25 年来,有关败血症的研究一直遵循这一适应性定义。2014 年,脓毒症管理的既定指南受到质疑,2016 年,脓毒症被重新定义为宿主对感染的失调反应。然而,对于哪些免疫或代谢机制失调仍未达成共识。我们试图研究 2016 年共识定义之后发表的败血症文献,并将其与 1991 年提出的最初全身炎症反应综合征范式进行比较。这项深入分析的目的是推荐一种新的脓毒症原型,同时考虑到最近在脓毒症中发现的失调免疫和代谢机制。护士和其他临床医生必须将他们的思维模式转向以证据为基础的失调模式,以改善败血症的识别和管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Embracing a New Evidence-Based Thought Paradigm of Sepsis.

Abstract: In 1991, sepsis was first defined by the Society of Critical Care Medicine as the systemic inflammatory response syndrome, in the presence of infection. Systemic inflammatory response syndrome is an adaptive host response to infection, as well as to other insults like trauma and stress. Research pertaining to sepsis was guided by this adaptive definition for 25 years. After established guidelines for sepsis management were challenged in 2014, sepsis was redefined in 2016 as a dysregulated host response to infection. However, there still remains no consensus on which immunologic or metabolic mechanisms have become dysregulated. We sought to examine sepsis literature published after the 2016 consensus definition and compare it to the original systemic inflammatory response syndrome paradigm proposed in 1991. The purpose of this intensive analysis was to recommend a new sepsis archetype, with consideration to dysregulated immunologic and metabolic mechanisms that have recently been identified in sepsis. Nurses and other clinicians must shift their thought paradigm toward an evidence-based dysregulated model, in order to improve on sepsis recognition and management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
83
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The purpose of Clinical Nurse Specialist™: The International Journal for Advanced Nursing Practice is to disseminate outcomes of clinical nurse specialist practice, to foster continued development o fthe clinical nurse specialist role, and to highlight clinical nurse specialist contributions to advancing nursing practice and health policy globally. Objectives of the journal are: 1. Disseminate knowledge about clinical nurse specialist competencies and the education and regulation of practice; 2. Communicate outcomes of clinical nurse specialist practice on quality, safety, and cost of nursing and health services across the continuum of care; 3. Promote evidence-based practice and innovation in the transformation of nursing and health policy for the betterment of the public welfare; 4. Foster intra-professional and interdisciplinary dialogue addressing nursing and health services for specialty populations in diverse care settings adn cultures.
期刊最新文献
A Letter to the Editor. Authorship and Acknowledgment in Nursing Publications: It's a Matter of Ethics. Clinical Nurse Specialist: Rounding to Reduce Indwelling Urinary Catheter Utilization at a Regional Hospital. Continuous Glucose Monitoring for Inpatients on Intravenous Insulin. Developing a Competency Assessment Index System for Hematology Nurses in China: Delphi Study Insights.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1