犬类嗅觉检测及其与 COVID-19 患者医学鉴定的相关性。

Infectious diseases (London, England) Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-18 DOI:10.1080/23744235.2024.2363887
Salma Ben Said, Rahma Jaballah, Hajer Yaakoubi, Houda Ben Salah, Rym Youssef, Nouhel Mzid, Marouen Kacemi, Imen Trabelsi, Ali Ben Ayed, Saed Ben Ayed, Lotfi Boukadida, Asma Zorgati, Riadh Boukef
{"title":"犬类嗅觉检测及其与 COVID-19 患者医学鉴定的相关性。","authors":"Salma Ben Said, Rahma Jaballah, Hajer Yaakoubi, Houda Ben Salah, Rym Youssef, Nouhel Mzid, Marouen Kacemi, Imen Trabelsi, Ali Ben Ayed, Saed Ben Ayed, Lotfi Boukadida, Asma Zorgati, Riadh Boukef","doi":"10.1080/23744235.2024.2363887","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The assessment of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in exhaled breath or sweat represents a potential non-invasive and rapid diagnostic tool for respiratory diseases.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine if trained dogs can reliably identify the odour associated with COVID19.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a monocentric prospective study carried out in the Emergency Department (ED) of a university hospital fromJulyto November 2021.Axillary sweat samples from all patients were collected bytwo trained health care professionals. The samples were collected in the form of sterile gauze swabs placed under the armpits for at least 4 h for each patient.Then, Tubes wereshiftedto the double-blind dog training centre for VOC detection by two individuals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Dogs were tested using a total of 129 axillary sweat samples; 69 of the 107 patients who tested positive for COVID-19 based on their odours had a positive PCR/Antigen test and 19 of the 22 patients who were tested negative for COVID-19 by the dogs had a negative PCR test. The sniffer dog infection detection method had a sensitivity of 95.83% and a specificity of 33.33%. The PPV was 64.49% and the NPVwas 86.36%. The measurement of the intensity of the connection between the two variables (disease/sign) was very strong (<i>Q</i> = 0.84). This link is statistically significant (X<sup>2</sup> = 19.13) with a probability <i>p ≤</i> 0.001.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, the use of trained detection dogs as a screening method for SARS-CoV-2 is an interesting avenue of research that warrants further exploration and validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":73372,"journal":{"name":"Infectious diseases (London, England)","volume":" ","pages":"880-886"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Canine olfactory detection and its relevance for the medical identification of patients with COVID-19.\",\"authors\":\"Salma Ben Said, Rahma Jaballah, Hajer Yaakoubi, Houda Ben Salah, Rym Youssef, Nouhel Mzid, Marouen Kacemi, Imen Trabelsi, Ali Ben Ayed, Saed Ben Ayed, Lotfi Boukadida, Asma Zorgati, Riadh Boukef\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23744235.2024.2363887\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The assessment of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in exhaled breath or sweat represents a potential non-invasive and rapid diagnostic tool for respiratory diseases.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine if trained dogs can reliably identify the odour associated with COVID19.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a monocentric prospective study carried out in the Emergency Department (ED) of a university hospital fromJulyto November 2021.Axillary sweat samples from all patients were collected bytwo trained health care professionals. The samples were collected in the form of sterile gauze swabs placed under the armpits for at least 4 h for each patient.Then, Tubes wereshiftedto the double-blind dog training centre for VOC detection by two individuals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Dogs were tested using a total of 129 axillary sweat samples; 69 of the 107 patients who tested positive for COVID-19 based on their odours had a positive PCR/Antigen test and 19 of the 22 patients who were tested negative for COVID-19 by the dogs had a negative PCR test. The sniffer dog infection detection method had a sensitivity of 95.83% and a specificity of 33.33%. The PPV was 64.49% and the NPVwas 86.36%. The measurement of the intensity of the connection between the two variables (disease/sign) was very strong (<i>Q</i> = 0.84). This link is statistically significant (X<sup>2</sup> = 19.13) with a probability <i>p ≤</i> 0.001.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, the use of trained detection dogs as a screening method for SARS-CoV-2 is an interesting avenue of research that warrants further exploration and validation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73372,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infectious diseases (London, England)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"880-886\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infectious diseases (London, England)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23744235.2024.2363887\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infectious diseases (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23744235.2024.2363887","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:评估呼出气体或汗液中的挥发性有机化合物(VOCs)是一种潜在的无创、快速诊断呼吸系统疾病的工具:评估呼出的气体或汗液中的挥发性有机化合物(VOCs)是一种潜在的非侵入性和快速的呼吸系统疾病诊断工具:方法:这是一项单中心前瞻性研究:这是一项单中心前瞻性研究,于 2021 年 7 月至 11 月在一所大学医院的急诊科 (ED) 进行。样本以无菌纱布棉签的形式采集,每位患者至少在腋下放置 4 小时。然后,由两人将试管转移到双盲犬训练中心进行挥发性有机化合物检测:狗共检测了 129 份腋窝汗液样本;在根据气味检测出 COVID-19 阳性的 107 名患者中,69 人的 PCR/抗原检测结果呈阳性;在狗检测出 COVID-19 阴性的 22 名患者中,19 人的 PCR 检测结果呈阴性。嗅探犬感染检测方法的灵敏度为 95.83%,特异性为 33.33%。PPV 为 64.49%,NPV 为 86.36%。对两个变量(疾病/体征)之间联系强度的测量结果非常准确(Q = 0.84)。这种联系具有统计学意义(X2 = 19.13),概率 p≤ 0.001:总之,使用训练有素的检测犬作为 SARS-CoV-2 的筛查方法是一个有趣的研究途径,值得进一步探索和验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Canine olfactory detection and its relevance for the medical identification of patients with COVID-19.

Introduction: The assessment of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in exhaled breath or sweat represents a potential non-invasive and rapid diagnostic tool for respiratory diseases.

Objective: To determine if trained dogs can reliably identify the odour associated with COVID19.

Methods: This is a monocentric prospective study carried out in the Emergency Department (ED) of a university hospital fromJulyto November 2021.Axillary sweat samples from all patients were collected bytwo trained health care professionals. The samples were collected in the form of sterile gauze swabs placed under the armpits for at least 4 h for each patient.Then, Tubes wereshiftedto the double-blind dog training centre for VOC detection by two individuals.

Results: Dogs were tested using a total of 129 axillary sweat samples; 69 of the 107 patients who tested positive for COVID-19 based on their odours had a positive PCR/Antigen test and 19 of the 22 patients who were tested negative for COVID-19 by the dogs had a negative PCR test. The sniffer dog infection detection method had a sensitivity of 95.83% and a specificity of 33.33%. The PPV was 64.49% and the NPVwas 86.36%. The measurement of the intensity of the connection between the two variables (disease/sign) was very strong (Q = 0.84). This link is statistically significant (X2 = 19.13) with a probability p ≤ 0.001.

Conclusion: Overall, the use of trained detection dogs as a screening method for SARS-CoV-2 is an interesting avenue of research that warrants further exploration and validation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Predicting persistent SARS-CoV-2 shedding in immunocompromised patients: a probability-based approach. National trends in pneumonia-related mortality in the United States, 1999-2019. Prevalence and risk factors for haematogenous periprosthetic joint infection during Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia. HPV-16 E6 mutation and viral integration related host DNA methylation implicate the development and progression of cervical cancer. Interferon gene expression declines over time post-COVID infection and in long COVID patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1