Hugo Clermidy, Guillaume Fadel, Benjamin Bottet, Yaniss Belaroussi, Maroua Eid, Elsa Armand, Jean-Marc Baste, Pierre-Benoit Pages, Alex Fourdrain, Charles Al Zreibi, Leslie Madelaine, Gabriel Saiydoun
{"title":"法国的机器人辅助胸外科培训:对全国年轻外科医生的调查。","authors":"Hugo Clermidy, Guillaume Fadel, Benjamin Bottet, Yaniss Belaroussi, Maroua Eid, Elsa Armand, Jean-Marc Baste, Pierre-Benoit Pages, Alex Fourdrain, Charles Al Zreibi, Leslie Madelaine, Gabriel Saiydoun","doi":"10.1093/icvts/ivae115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Evaluate theoretical and practical training of thoracic surgeons-in-training in robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) in France.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey was distributed to thoracic surgeons-in-training in France from November 2022 to February 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We recruited 101 thoracic surgeons-in-training (77% response rate). Over half had access to a surgical robotics system at their current institution. Most (74%) considered robotic surgery training essential, 90% had attended a robotic procedure. Only 18% had performed a complete thoracic robotic procedure as the main operator. A complete RATS procedure was performed by 42% of fellows and 6% of residents. Of the remaining surgeons, 23% had performed part of a robotic procedure. Theoretical courses and simulation are well developed; 72% of residents and 91% of fellows had undergone simulation training in the operating room, at training facilities, or during congress amounting to <10 h (for 73% of the fellows and residents), 10-20 h (17%), 20-30 h (8%) or >30 h (3%). Access to RATS was ≥1 day/week in 71% of thoracic departments with robotic access. Fellows spent a median of 2 (IQR 1-3) semesters in departments performing robotic surgery. Compared with low-volume centres, trainees at high-volume centres performed significantly more complete robotic procedures (47% vs 13%; P = 0.001), as did fellows compared with residents.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Few young surgeons perform complete thoracic robotic procedures during practical training, and access remains centre dependent. Opportunities increase with seniority and exposure; however, increasing availability of robotic devices, theoretical formation, and simulation courses will increase opportunities.</p>","PeriodicalId":73406,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11219244/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Robotic-assisted thoracic surgery training in France: a nation-wide survey from young surgeons.\",\"authors\":\"Hugo Clermidy, Guillaume Fadel, Benjamin Bottet, Yaniss Belaroussi, Maroua Eid, Elsa Armand, Jean-Marc Baste, Pierre-Benoit Pages, Alex Fourdrain, Charles Al Zreibi, Leslie Madelaine, Gabriel Saiydoun\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/icvts/ivae115\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Evaluate theoretical and practical training of thoracic surgeons-in-training in robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) in France.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey was distributed to thoracic surgeons-in-training in France from November 2022 to February 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We recruited 101 thoracic surgeons-in-training (77% response rate). Over half had access to a surgical robotics system at their current institution. Most (74%) considered robotic surgery training essential, 90% had attended a robotic procedure. Only 18% had performed a complete thoracic robotic procedure as the main operator. A complete RATS procedure was performed by 42% of fellows and 6% of residents. Of the remaining surgeons, 23% had performed part of a robotic procedure. Theoretical courses and simulation are well developed; 72% of residents and 91% of fellows had undergone simulation training in the operating room, at training facilities, or during congress amounting to <10 h (for 73% of the fellows and residents), 10-20 h (17%), 20-30 h (8%) or >30 h (3%). Access to RATS was ≥1 day/week in 71% of thoracic departments with robotic access. Fellows spent a median of 2 (IQR 1-3) semesters in departments performing robotic surgery. Compared with low-volume centres, trainees at high-volume centres performed significantly more complete robotic procedures (47% vs 13%; P = 0.001), as did fellows compared with residents.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Few young surgeons perform complete thoracic robotic procedures during practical training, and access remains centre dependent. Opportunities increase with seniority and exposure; however, increasing availability of robotic devices, theoretical formation, and simulation courses will increase opportunities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73406,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11219244/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivae115\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivae115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的评估法国在训胸外科医生在机器人辅助胸腔镜手术(RATS)方面的理论和实践培训:方法:在 2022 年 11 月至 2023 年 2 月期间向法国的胸外科培训医师发放调查问卷:我们招募了 101 名胸外科实习医生(回复率为 77%)。超过半数的人在其目前所在的机构使用过手术机器人系统。大多数人(74%)认为机器人手术培训必不可少,90%的人参加过机器人手术。只有18%的人作为主要操作者实施过完整的胸腔机器人手术。42%的研究员和6%的住院医生实施过完整的机器人胸腔手术。在其余的外科医生中,23%的人实施过部分机器人手术。理论课程和模拟训练发展良好;72%的住院医师和91%的研究员曾在手术室、培训机构或大会期间接受过30小时(3%)的模拟训练。在71%有机器人接入的胸外科中,使用RATS的时间≥1天/周。研究员在实施机器人手术的科室度过的时间中位数为2个学期(IQR 1-3)。与低手术量中心相比,高手术量中心的受训人员完成的完整机器人手术明显更多(47% vs 13%; p = 0.001),研究员与住院医师相比也是如此:结论:很少有年轻外科医生在实习培训期间进行完整的胸腔镜机器人手术,而且手术机会仍取决于培训中心。机会随着年资和接触面的增加而增加;不过,机器人设备、理论培训和模拟课程的增加将增加机会。
Robotic-assisted thoracic surgery training in France: a nation-wide survey from young surgeons.
Objectives: Evaluate theoretical and practical training of thoracic surgeons-in-training in robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) in France.
Methods: A survey was distributed to thoracic surgeons-in-training in France from November 2022 to February 2023.
Results: We recruited 101 thoracic surgeons-in-training (77% response rate). Over half had access to a surgical robotics system at their current institution. Most (74%) considered robotic surgery training essential, 90% had attended a robotic procedure. Only 18% had performed a complete thoracic robotic procedure as the main operator. A complete RATS procedure was performed by 42% of fellows and 6% of residents. Of the remaining surgeons, 23% had performed part of a robotic procedure. Theoretical courses and simulation are well developed; 72% of residents and 91% of fellows had undergone simulation training in the operating room, at training facilities, or during congress amounting to <10 h (for 73% of the fellows and residents), 10-20 h (17%), 20-30 h (8%) or >30 h (3%). Access to RATS was ≥1 day/week in 71% of thoracic departments with robotic access. Fellows spent a median of 2 (IQR 1-3) semesters in departments performing robotic surgery. Compared with low-volume centres, trainees at high-volume centres performed significantly more complete robotic procedures (47% vs 13%; P = 0.001), as did fellows compared with residents.
Conclusions: Few young surgeons perform complete thoracic robotic procedures during practical training, and access remains centre dependent. Opportunities increase with seniority and exposure; however, increasing availability of robotic devices, theoretical formation, and simulation courses will increase opportunities.