{"title":"用于比较研究的倾向得分匹配:使用 R 和 Rex 的教程。","authors":"Bora Lee, Nam-Eun Kim, Sungho Won, Jungsoo Gim","doi":"10.7602/jmis.2024.27.2.55","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recently, there has been considerable progress in developing new technologies and equipment for the medical field, including minimally invasive surgeries. Evaluating the effectiveness of these treatments requires study designs like randomized controlled trials. However, due to the nature of certain treatments, randomization is not always feasible, leading to the use of observational studies. The effect size estimated from observational studies is subject to selection bias caused by confounders. One method to reduce this bias is propensity scoring. This study aimed to introduce a propensity score matching process between two groups using a practical example with R. Additionally, Rex, an Excel add-in graphical user interface statistical program, is provided for researchers unfamiliar with R programming. Further techniques, such as matching with three or more groups, propensity score weighting and stratification, and imputation of missing values, are summarized to offer approaches for more complex studies not covered in this tutorial.</p>","PeriodicalId":73832,"journal":{"name":"Journal of minimally invasive surgery","volume":"27 2","pages":"55-71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11187614/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Propensity score matching for comparative studies: a tutorial with R and Rex.\",\"authors\":\"Bora Lee, Nam-Eun Kim, Sungho Won, Jungsoo Gim\",\"doi\":\"10.7602/jmis.2024.27.2.55\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Recently, there has been considerable progress in developing new technologies and equipment for the medical field, including minimally invasive surgeries. Evaluating the effectiveness of these treatments requires study designs like randomized controlled trials. However, due to the nature of certain treatments, randomization is not always feasible, leading to the use of observational studies. The effect size estimated from observational studies is subject to selection bias caused by confounders. One method to reduce this bias is propensity scoring. This study aimed to introduce a propensity score matching process between two groups using a practical example with R. Additionally, Rex, an Excel add-in graphical user interface statistical program, is provided for researchers unfamiliar with R programming. Further techniques, such as matching with three or more groups, propensity score weighting and stratification, and imputation of missing values, are summarized to offer approaches for more complex studies not covered in this tutorial.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73832,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of minimally invasive surgery\",\"volume\":\"27 2\",\"pages\":\"55-71\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11187614/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of minimally invasive surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7602/jmis.2024.27.2.55\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of minimally invasive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7602/jmis.2024.27.2.55","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
最近,医疗领域在开发新技术和新设备(包括微创手术)方面取得了长足的进步。评估这些治疗方法的有效性需要采用随机对照试验等研究设计。然而,由于某些治疗方法的性质,随机化并不总是可行的,因此需要使用观察性研究。从观察性研究中估算出的效应大小会受到混杂因素造成的选择偏差的影响。倾向评分是减少这种偏差的方法之一。此外,本研究还为不熟悉 R 编程的研究人员提供了 Excel 附加图形用户界面统计程序 Rex。本教程还总结了其他技术,如三个或更多组的匹配、倾向得分加权和分层以及缺失值的估算,为本教程未涉及的更复杂的研究提供了方法。
Propensity score matching for comparative studies: a tutorial with R and Rex.
Recently, there has been considerable progress in developing new technologies and equipment for the medical field, including minimally invasive surgeries. Evaluating the effectiveness of these treatments requires study designs like randomized controlled trials. However, due to the nature of certain treatments, randomization is not always feasible, leading to the use of observational studies. The effect size estimated from observational studies is subject to selection bias caused by confounders. One method to reduce this bias is propensity scoring. This study aimed to introduce a propensity score matching process between two groups using a practical example with R. Additionally, Rex, an Excel add-in graphical user interface statistical program, is provided for researchers unfamiliar with R programming. Further techniques, such as matching with three or more groups, propensity score weighting and stratification, and imputation of missing values, are summarized to offer approaches for more complex studies not covered in this tutorial.