社会、医疗保健和健康科学领域教育工作者的混合教育能力:横断面研究

IF 1.9 Q2 NURSING Teaching and Learning in Nursing Pub Date : 2024-05-26 DOI:10.1016/j.teln.2024.03.012
Riina Jämsä , Sari Pramila-Savukoski , Heli-Maria Kuivila , Henna Jokinen , Jonna Juntunen , Minna Koskimäki , Tiina Törmänen , Kristina Mikkonen
{"title":"社会、医疗保健和健康科学领域教育工作者的混合教育能力:横断面研究","authors":"Riina Jämsä ,&nbsp;Sari Pramila-Savukoski ,&nbsp;Heli-Maria Kuivila ,&nbsp;Henna Jokinen ,&nbsp;Jonna Juntunen ,&nbsp;Minna Koskimäki ,&nbsp;Tiina Törmänen ,&nbsp;Kristina Mikkonen","doi":"10.1016/j.teln.2024.03.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Hybrid education has become a topical issue, and identified as an area for development.</p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>The aim of this study was to describe and explain educators’ hybrid education competence areas in higher education and the factors associated with these areas.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The data was collected nationally in Finland using the HybridEduCom instrument (Likert scale 1–5) from social, healthcare, and health science educators (n = 1689) between August and November 2022, with a response rate of 12% (n = 206).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Logistic regression analysis was used to identify the effects of educators’ background factors on the hybrid education competence. Educators rated interaction competence as the strongest (3.15) and digital pedagogical competence as the weakest (2.78). Three clusters of competence profiles—A (an advanced level, 31.1%), B (a good level, 42.2%) and C (a beginner level, 26.7%)—were generated from the data, with a statistically significant difference (p &lt; 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study showed that educators need the most support in digital and ethical competences for hybrid education.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46287,"journal":{"name":"Teaching and Learning in Nursing","volume":"19 3","pages":"Pages e550-e556"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1557308724000635/pdfft?md5=9b7f0a6496a6213d6e0ec4bfb5dac130&pid=1-s2.0-S1557308724000635-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The hybrid education competence of educators in the social, healthcare, and health science fields: a cross-sectional study\",\"authors\":\"Riina Jämsä ,&nbsp;Sari Pramila-Savukoski ,&nbsp;Heli-Maria Kuivila ,&nbsp;Henna Jokinen ,&nbsp;Jonna Juntunen ,&nbsp;Minna Koskimäki ,&nbsp;Tiina Törmänen ,&nbsp;Kristina Mikkonen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.teln.2024.03.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Hybrid education has become a topical issue, and identified as an area for development.</p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>The aim of this study was to describe and explain educators’ hybrid education competence areas in higher education and the factors associated with these areas.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The data was collected nationally in Finland using the HybridEduCom instrument (Likert scale 1–5) from social, healthcare, and health science educators (n = 1689) between August and November 2022, with a response rate of 12% (n = 206).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Logistic regression analysis was used to identify the effects of educators’ background factors on the hybrid education competence. Educators rated interaction competence as the strongest (3.15) and digital pedagogical competence as the weakest (2.78). Three clusters of competence profiles—A (an advanced level, 31.1%), B (a good level, 42.2%) and C (a beginner level, 26.7%)—were generated from the data, with a statistically significant difference (p &lt; 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study showed that educators need the most support in digital and ethical competences for hybrid education.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46287,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Teaching and Learning in Nursing\",\"volume\":\"19 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages e550-e556\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1557308724000635/pdfft?md5=9b7f0a6496a6213d6e0ec4bfb5dac130&pid=1-s2.0-S1557308724000635-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Teaching and Learning in Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1557308724000635\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teaching and Learning in Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1557308724000635","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在描述和解释高等教育中教育工作者的混合教育能力领域以及与这些领域相关的因素。方法在 2022 年 8 月至 11 月期间,使用 HybridEduCom 工具(李克特量表 1-5)在芬兰全国范围内收集社会、医疗保健和健康科学教育工作者(n = 1689)的数据,回复率为 12%(n = 206)。结果使用逻辑回归分析确定教育工作者的背景因素对混合教育能力的影响。教育工作者认为互动能力最强(3.15),数字教学能力最弱(2.78)。从数据中得出了三组能力特征--A(高级水平,31.1%)、B(良好水平,42.2%)和 C(初级水平,26.7%),差异具有统计学意义(p <0.001)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The hybrid education competence of educators in the social, healthcare, and health science fields: a cross-sectional study

Background

Hybrid education has become a topical issue, and identified as an area for development.

Aim

The aim of this study was to describe and explain educators’ hybrid education competence areas in higher education and the factors associated with these areas.

Methods

The data was collected nationally in Finland using the HybridEduCom instrument (Likert scale 1–5) from social, healthcare, and health science educators (n = 1689) between August and November 2022, with a response rate of 12% (n = 206).

Results

Logistic regression analysis was used to identify the effects of educators’ background factors on the hybrid education competence. Educators rated interaction competence as the strongest (3.15) and digital pedagogical competence as the weakest (2.78). Three clusters of competence profiles—A (an advanced level, 31.1%), B (a good level, 42.2%) and C (a beginner level, 26.7%)—were generated from the data, with a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

This study showed that educators need the most support in digital and ethical competences for hybrid education.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
10.50%
发文量
119
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Teaching and Learning in Nursing is the Official Journal of the National Organization of Associate Degree Nursing. The journal is dedicated to the advancement of Associate Degree Nursing education and practice, and promotes collaboration in charting the future of health care education and delivery. Topics include: - Managing Different Learning Styles - New Faculty Mentoring - Legal Issues - Research - Legislative Issues - Instructional Design Strategies - Leadership, Management Roles - Unique Funding for Programs and Faculty
期刊最新文献
Perception of caring behaviors of faculty members from the perspective of nursing students The Urgency of Teaching Theory in the Current Nursing Education Landscape OADN's Milestone Anniversary: Celebrating 40 Years of Advocacy, Education, and Leadership Nurse Educators’ Perspectives in Facilitating Ethics Education: A Descriptive Qualitative Study Implementing Entrustable Professional Activities in a pre-licensure nursing program to facilitate competency-based education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1