走进关系:交流如何揭示和说服关系决策

IF 2.9 2区 社会学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY Social Networks Pub Date : 2024-06-17 DOI:10.1016/j.socnet.2024.05.003
Daniel A. McFarland , David Broska , Vinodkumar Prabhakaran , Dan Jurafsky
{"title":"走进关系:交流如何揭示和说服关系决策","authors":"Daniel A. McFarland ,&nbsp;David Broska ,&nbsp;Vinodkumar Prabhakaran ,&nbsp;Dan Jurafsky","doi":"10.1016/j.socnet.2024.05.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Coming into relations involves exiting a state of indecision and deciding whether to relate or not. Little research has focused on these initial moments, the communications involved, and the making of a relational decision. We study this process using 947 speed dating encounters, their minute-by-minute communications, and the reported timing of relational decisions. We show that certain forms of communication reveal an actor’s relational state of being undecided, desiring a relation, or not desiring a relation (<em>revealing signals</em>). For example, indecision corresponds with indirect and ambiguous communication (negative facework); desiring a relation entails positive, excited, and entraining communication (positive facework); and not desiring a relation involves routine talk. We also show that certain forms of communication persuade persons to transition relational states, moving beyond their indecision and coming to a relational decision (<em>persuasive signals</em>). Interestingly, only some revealing signals are persuasive and bring about corresponding relational decisions in others. These tend to be <em>clear signals</em> that cannot be attributed to the situation or politeness. Last, some signals persuade relational decisions without corresponding to a relational state. These <em>performative signals</em> are select forms of ambiguous communication that place the speaker in an advantaged position within social exchange.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48353,"journal":{"name":"Social Networks","volume":"79 ","pages":"Pages 57-75"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Coming into relations: How communication reveals and persuades relational decisions\",\"authors\":\"Daniel A. McFarland ,&nbsp;David Broska ,&nbsp;Vinodkumar Prabhakaran ,&nbsp;Dan Jurafsky\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.socnet.2024.05.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Coming into relations involves exiting a state of indecision and deciding whether to relate or not. Little research has focused on these initial moments, the communications involved, and the making of a relational decision. We study this process using 947 speed dating encounters, their minute-by-minute communications, and the reported timing of relational decisions. We show that certain forms of communication reveal an actor’s relational state of being undecided, desiring a relation, or not desiring a relation (<em>revealing signals</em>). For example, indecision corresponds with indirect and ambiguous communication (negative facework); desiring a relation entails positive, excited, and entraining communication (positive facework); and not desiring a relation involves routine talk. We also show that certain forms of communication persuade persons to transition relational states, moving beyond their indecision and coming to a relational decision (<em>persuasive signals</em>). Interestingly, only some revealing signals are persuasive and bring about corresponding relational decisions in others. These tend to be <em>clear signals</em> that cannot be attributed to the situation or politeness. Last, some signals persuade relational decisions without corresponding to a relational state. These <em>performative signals</em> are select forms of ambiguous communication that place the speaker in an advantaged position within social exchange.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48353,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Networks\",\"volume\":\"79 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 57-75\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Networks\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378873324000315\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Networks","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378873324000315","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

开始建立关系需要摆脱犹豫不决的状态,决定是否建立关系。很少有研究关注这些初始时刻、所涉及的交流以及关系决定的做出。我们利用 947 次快速约会、每分钟的交流以及报告的关系决定时间来研究这一过程。我们发现,某些形式的交流揭示了行为者的关系状态,即未决定、希望建立关系或不希望建立关系(揭示信号)。例如,犹豫不决对应的是间接和模棱两可的交流(消极的面子工程);渴望一种关系需要积极、兴奋和诱导性的交流(积极的面子工程);而不渴望一种关系则涉及例行谈话。我们还发现,某些形式的交流会说服人们转换关系状态,超越犹豫不决的状态,做出关系决定(说服信号)。有趣的是,只有某些揭示性信号才具有说服力,并能给他人带来相应的关系决定。这些信号往往是明确的信号,不能归因于情境或礼貌。最后,有些信号会说服他人做出关系决定,但并不与关系状态相对应。这些表演性信号是选择性的模棱两可的交流形式,使说话者在社会交流中处于有利地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Coming into relations: How communication reveals and persuades relational decisions

Coming into relations involves exiting a state of indecision and deciding whether to relate or not. Little research has focused on these initial moments, the communications involved, and the making of a relational decision. We study this process using 947 speed dating encounters, their minute-by-minute communications, and the reported timing of relational decisions. We show that certain forms of communication reveal an actor’s relational state of being undecided, desiring a relation, or not desiring a relation (revealing signals). For example, indecision corresponds with indirect and ambiguous communication (negative facework); desiring a relation entails positive, excited, and entraining communication (positive facework); and not desiring a relation involves routine talk. We also show that certain forms of communication persuade persons to transition relational states, moving beyond their indecision and coming to a relational decision (persuasive signals). Interestingly, only some revealing signals are persuasive and bring about corresponding relational decisions in others. These tend to be clear signals that cannot be attributed to the situation or politeness. Last, some signals persuade relational decisions without corresponding to a relational state. These performative signals are select forms of ambiguous communication that place the speaker in an advantaged position within social exchange.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Social Networks
Social Networks Multiple-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
12.90%
发文量
118
期刊介绍: Social Networks is an interdisciplinary and international quarterly. It provides a common forum for representatives of anthropology, sociology, history, social psychology, political science, human geography, biology, economics, communications science and other disciplines who share an interest in the study of the empirical structure of social relations and associations that may be expressed in network form. It publishes both theoretical and substantive papers. Critical reviews of major theoretical or methodological approaches using the notion of networks in the analysis of social behaviour are also included, as are reviews of recent books dealing with social networks and social structure.
期刊最新文献
Why distinctiveness centrality is distinctive Editorial Board How many friends do youth nominate? A meta-analysis of gender, age, and geographic differences in average outdegree centrality A stopping rule for randomly sampling bipartite networks with fixed degree sequences Multilevel integrated healthcare: The evaluation of Project ECHO® networks to integrate children’s healthcare in Australia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1