以南方为支点:通过中国的 "一带一路 "倡议实现可持续发展目标

IF 3.1 1区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY Geography Compass Pub Date : 2024-06-17 DOI:10.1111/gec3.12762
Hannah McNicol
{"title":"以南方为支点:通过中国的 \"一带一路 \"倡议实现可持续发展目标","authors":"Hannah McNicol","doi":"10.1111/gec3.12762","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Whilst China's aid and development model has been traditionally understood as divergent from the dominant post-1945 liberal development model, scholars are also increasingly exploring convergence between features of the two development models. Recently, scholars from a range of disciplines including development studies, development geography and international (business, environment and legal) studies have explored a process whereby China's Belt and Road Initiative and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals converge (‘BRI-SDG integration’). This paper brings these multidisciplinary strands of scholarship together and places them in dialogue with social sciences convergence theory to understand how BRI-SDG integration aligns with or challenges previous conceptualisations of Chinese-dominant development convergence. The paper first demonstrates that BRI-SDG integration proposes a novel and deliberate convergence process - which the paper names ‘complementary convergence’. However, BRI-SDG integration also underscores the need for more multidirectional frameworks that reject Eurocentricity for evaluating the contemporary Chinese-dominant relationship, and an enhanced focus on how China is influencing dominant development institutions. Finally, BRI-SDG integration reiterates the methodological difficulties of delineating between ‘development models’ in an increasingly interrelated global governance of development.</p>","PeriodicalId":51411,"journal":{"name":"Geography Compass","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gec3.12762","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pivot to the South: Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals through China's Belt and Road Initiative\",\"authors\":\"Hannah McNicol\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/gec3.12762\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Whilst China's aid and development model has been traditionally understood as divergent from the dominant post-1945 liberal development model, scholars are also increasingly exploring convergence between features of the two development models. Recently, scholars from a range of disciplines including development studies, development geography and international (business, environment and legal) studies have explored a process whereby China's Belt and Road Initiative and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals converge (‘BRI-SDG integration’). This paper brings these multidisciplinary strands of scholarship together and places them in dialogue with social sciences convergence theory to understand how BRI-SDG integration aligns with or challenges previous conceptualisations of Chinese-dominant development convergence. The paper first demonstrates that BRI-SDG integration proposes a novel and deliberate convergence process - which the paper names ‘complementary convergence’. However, BRI-SDG integration also underscores the need for more multidirectional frameworks that reject Eurocentricity for evaluating the contemporary Chinese-dominant relationship, and an enhanced focus on how China is influencing dominant development institutions. Finally, BRI-SDG integration reiterates the methodological difficulties of delineating between ‘development models’ in an increasingly interrelated global governance of development.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51411,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geography Compass\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gec3.12762\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geography Compass\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gec3.12762\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geography Compass","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gec3.12762","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然中国的援助与发展模式传统上被理解为有别于 1945 年后占主导地位的自由主义发展模式,但学者们也越来越多地探索这两种发展模式之间的趋同性。最近,来自发展研究、发展地理学和国际(商业、环境和法律)研究等多个学科的学者探讨了中国的 "一带一路 "倡议与联合国可持续发展目标的融合过程("'一带一路'倡议与可持续发展目标的融合")。本文汇集了这些多学科的学术成果,并将其与社会科学融合理论进行对话,以了解 "一带一路 "倡议与联合国可持续发展目标的融合如何与以往关于中国主导的发展融合的概念相吻合或对其提出挑战。本文首先表明,金砖倡议与发展集团的融合提出了一种新颖而审慎的融合过程--本文将其命名为 "互补性融合"。然而,BRI-SDG 一体化也强调,在评估当代中国主导型关系时,需要摒弃欧洲中心论,建立更多的多向框架,并更加关注中国如何影响主导型发展机构。最后,BRI-SDG 一体化重申了在日益相互关联的全球发展治理中划分 "发展模式 "的方法论困难。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pivot to the South: Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals through China's Belt and Road Initiative

Whilst China's aid and development model has been traditionally understood as divergent from the dominant post-1945 liberal development model, scholars are also increasingly exploring convergence between features of the two development models. Recently, scholars from a range of disciplines including development studies, development geography and international (business, environment and legal) studies have explored a process whereby China's Belt and Road Initiative and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals converge (‘BRI-SDG integration’). This paper brings these multidisciplinary strands of scholarship together and places them in dialogue with social sciences convergence theory to understand how BRI-SDG integration aligns with or challenges previous conceptualisations of Chinese-dominant development convergence. The paper first demonstrates that BRI-SDG integration proposes a novel and deliberate convergence process - which the paper names ‘complementary convergence’. However, BRI-SDG integration also underscores the need for more multidirectional frameworks that reject Eurocentricity for evaluating the contemporary Chinese-dominant relationship, and an enhanced focus on how China is influencing dominant development institutions. Finally, BRI-SDG integration reiterates the methodological difficulties of delineating between ‘development models’ in an increasingly interrelated global governance of development.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geography Compass
Geography Compass GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
6.50%
发文量
61
期刊介绍: Unique in its range, Geography Compass is an online-only journal publishing original, peer-reviewed surveys of current research from across the entire discipline. Geography Compass publishes state-of-the-art reviews, supported by a comprehensive bibliography and accessible to an international readership. Geography Compass is aimed at senior undergraduates, postgraduates and academics, and will provide a unique reference tool for researching essays, preparing lectures, writing a research proposal, or just keeping up with new developments in a specific area of interest.
期刊最新文献
The Legal Geographies of Contracts: A Method on Formation, Substance and Enforcement Disrupting the Chrononormativity of Geographies of Youth and Youth Studies: Learning From Infractions at the Border Defining Climate Finance Justice: Critical Geographies of Justice Amid Financialized Climate Action Issue Information Homelessness and Sofa-Surfing: Everyday Belonging, Mobilities, Identities and Morals in Hidden Spaces of Welfare
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1