特应性湿疹问卷 RECAP 在瑞典人群中的跨文化验证。

IF 3.5 4区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY Acta dermato-venereologica Pub Date : 2024-06-19 DOI:10.2340/actadv.v104.38889
Gunnthorunn Sigurdardottir, Mikael Alsterholm, Chris D Andersson, Maria Bradley, MariHelen Sandström Falk, Emma K Johansson, Maria Lundqvist, Andreas Sonesson, Åke Svensson, Grigorios Theodosiou, Sophie Vrang, Laura B Von Kobyletzki
{"title":"特应性湿疹问卷 RECAP 在瑞典人群中的跨文化验证。","authors":"Gunnthorunn Sigurdardottir, Mikael Alsterholm, Chris D Andersson, Maria Bradley, MariHelen Sandström Falk, Emma K Johansson, Maria Lundqvist, Andreas Sonesson, Åke Svensson, Grigorios Theodosiou, Sophie Vrang, Laura B Von Kobyletzki","doi":"10.2340/actadv.v104.38889","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A Swedish translation of the patient-reported outcome measure for assessing long-term control of atopic dermatitis, Recap of atopic eczema (RECAP), has not been validated. Cross-cultural translation and multi-centre validation of the translated RECAP questionnaire were therefore performed. Disease severity was assessed using the validated Investigator Global Assessment Scale for atopic dermatitis (vIGA-ADTM). The Swedish RECAP was completed by 208 individuals aged 16 years or older with a median age of 36 years (interquartile range [IQR] 27-48). The participants considered the questionnaire suitable for assessing eczema control. The median RECAP score (range 0-28) was 12 (IQR 5-19). The mean and median vIGA-ADTM scores (range 0-4) were 2 (standard deviation [SD] 2) and 3 (IQR 2-4), respectively. A correlation between RECAP and the vIGA-ADTM was observed (p < 0.001). There was no significant change in scores for participants who answered the questionnaire twice within 14 days. Over time, improved or worsened eczema, as evaluat-ed by vIGA-ADTM, affected RECAP scores significantly (p < 0.001). The study suggests that RECAP can assess AD control in a Swedish clinical setting and shows -acceptable reliability.</p>","PeriodicalId":6944,"journal":{"name":"Acta dermato-venereologica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11210490/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cross-Cultural Validation of the RECAP of Atopic Eczema Question-naire in a Swedish Population.\",\"authors\":\"Gunnthorunn Sigurdardottir, Mikael Alsterholm, Chris D Andersson, Maria Bradley, MariHelen Sandström Falk, Emma K Johansson, Maria Lundqvist, Andreas Sonesson, Åke Svensson, Grigorios Theodosiou, Sophie Vrang, Laura B Von Kobyletzki\",\"doi\":\"10.2340/actadv.v104.38889\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A Swedish translation of the patient-reported outcome measure for assessing long-term control of atopic dermatitis, Recap of atopic eczema (RECAP), has not been validated. Cross-cultural translation and multi-centre validation of the translated RECAP questionnaire were therefore performed. Disease severity was assessed using the validated Investigator Global Assessment Scale for atopic dermatitis (vIGA-ADTM). The Swedish RECAP was completed by 208 individuals aged 16 years or older with a median age of 36 years (interquartile range [IQR] 27-48). The participants considered the questionnaire suitable for assessing eczema control. The median RECAP score (range 0-28) was 12 (IQR 5-19). The mean and median vIGA-ADTM scores (range 0-4) were 2 (standard deviation [SD] 2) and 3 (IQR 2-4), respectively. A correlation between RECAP and the vIGA-ADTM was observed (p < 0.001). There was no significant change in scores for participants who answered the questionnaire twice within 14 days. Over time, improved or worsened eczema, as evaluat-ed by vIGA-ADTM, affected RECAP scores significantly (p < 0.001). The study suggests that RECAP can assess AD control in a Swedish clinical setting and shows -acceptable reliability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6944,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta dermato-venereologica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11210490/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta dermato-venereologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2340/actadv.v104.38889\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta dermato-venereologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/actadv.v104.38889","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

用于评估特应性皮炎长期控制情况的患者报告结果测量方法--特应性湿疹回顾(RECAP)的瑞典语译文尚未得到验证。因此,我们对翻译后的 RECAP 问卷进行了跨文化翻译和多中心验证。疾病严重程度采用经过验证的特应性皮炎调查者全球评估量表(vIGA-ADTM)进行评估。208名年龄在16岁或16岁以上、中位年龄为36岁(四分位距[IQR]27-48)的人填写了瑞典语RECAP问卷。参与者认为该问卷适合用于评估湿疹控制情况。RECAP 评分(0-28 分之间)的中位数为 12(IQR 5-19)。vIGA-ADTM 评分(范围 0-4)的平均值和中位数分别为 2(标准差 [SD] 2)和 3(IQR 2-4)。RECAP 与 vIGA-ADTM 之间存在相关性(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cross-Cultural Validation of the RECAP of Atopic Eczema Question-naire in a Swedish Population.

A Swedish translation of the patient-reported outcome measure for assessing long-term control of atopic dermatitis, Recap of atopic eczema (RECAP), has not been validated. Cross-cultural translation and multi-centre validation of the translated RECAP questionnaire were therefore performed. Disease severity was assessed using the validated Investigator Global Assessment Scale for atopic dermatitis (vIGA-ADTM). The Swedish RECAP was completed by 208 individuals aged 16 years or older with a median age of 36 years (interquartile range [IQR] 27-48). The participants considered the questionnaire suitable for assessing eczema control. The median RECAP score (range 0-28) was 12 (IQR 5-19). The mean and median vIGA-ADTM scores (range 0-4) were 2 (standard deviation [SD] 2) and 3 (IQR 2-4), respectively. A correlation between RECAP and the vIGA-ADTM was observed (p < 0.001). There was no significant change in scores for participants who answered the questionnaire twice within 14 days. Over time, improved or worsened eczema, as evaluat-ed by vIGA-ADTM, affected RECAP scores significantly (p < 0.001). The study suggests that RECAP can assess AD control in a Swedish clinical setting and shows -acceptable reliability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta dermato-venereologica
Acta dermato-venereologica 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
2.80%
发文量
210
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Dermato-Venereologica publishes high-quality manuscripts in English in the field of Dermatology and Venereology, dealing with new observations on basic dermatological and venereological research, as well as clinical investigations. Each volume also features a number of Review articles in special areas, as well as short Letters to the Editor to stimulate debate and to disseminate important clinical observations. Acta Dermato-Venereologica has rapid publication times and is amply illustrated with a large number of colour photographs.
期刊最新文献
Notalgia Paresthetica Dermatologist Report of Symptom Burden and Treatment: Results from a Physician Survey. Severe Acute Generalized Exanthematous Pustulosis Successfully Treated by Spesolimab. Interventions to Reduce Skin-related Self-stigma: A Systematic Review. To what Extent does Vitamin D and its Serum Levels Influence the Severity of Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Literature Review. Anti-p200 Pemphigoid Mimicking Acquired Reactive Perforating Collagenosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1