抗CD19嵌合抗原受体T细胞疗法对里氏转化的疗效低于对新生大B细胞淋巴瘤和转化的低级别B细胞淋巴瘤的疗效。

IF 8.2 1区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Haematologica Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.3324/haematol.2023.284664
Ohad Benjamini, Shalev Fried, Roni Shouval, Jessica R Flynn, Ofrat Beyar-Katz, Lori A Leslie, Tsilla Zucherman, Ronit Yerushalmi, Noga Shem-Tov, Maria Lia Palomba, Ivetta Danylesko, Inbal Sdayoor, Hila Malka, Orit Itzhaki, Hyung Suh, Sean M Devlin, Ronit Marcus, Parastoo B Dahi, Elad Jacoby, Gunjan L Shah, Craig S Sauter, Andrew Ip, Miguel-Angel Perales, Arnon Nagler, Avichai Shimoni, Michael Scordo, Abraham Avigdor
{"title":"抗CD19嵌合抗原受体T细胞疗法对里氏转化的疗效低于对新生大B细胞淋巴瘤和转化的低级别B细胞淋巴瘤的疗效。","authors":"Ohad Benjamini, Shalev Fried, Roni Shouval, Jessica R Flynn, Ofrat Beyar-Katz, Lori A Leslie, Tsilla Zucherman, Ronit Yerushalmi, Noga Shem-Tov, Maria Lia Palomba, Ivetta Danylesko, Inbal Sdayoor, Hila Malka, Orit Itzhaki, Hyung Suh, Sean M Devlin, Ronit Marcus, Parastoo B Dahi, Elad Jacoby, Gunjan L Shah, Craig S Sauter, Andrew Ip, Miguel-Angel Perales, Arnon Nagler, Avichai Shimoni, Michael Scordo, Abraham Avigdor","doi":"10.3324/haematol.2023.284664","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The activity of anti-CD19 chimerci antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) with Richter's transformation (RT) to aggressive large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) is largely unknown. In a multicenter retrospective study, we report the safety and efficacy of CAR T-cell therapy in patients with RT (N=30) compared to patients with aggressive B-cell lymphoma (N=283) and patients with transformed indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (iNHL) (N=141) between April 2016 and January 2023. Two-thirds of patients received prior therapy for CLL before RT and 89% of them received B-cell receptor and B-cell lymphoma 2 inhibitors. Toxicities of CAR T-cell therapy in RT were similar to other lymphomas, with no fatalities related to cytokine release syndrome or immune effector-cell associated neurotoxicity synderome. The 100-day overall response rate and complete response rates in patients with RT were 57% and 47%, respectively. With a median follow-up of 19 months, the median overall survival (OS) was 9.9 months in patients with RT compared to 18 months in de novo LBCL and not reached in patients with transformed iNHL. The OS at 12 months was 45% in patients with RT compared with 62% and 75% in patients with de novo LBCL and transformed iNHL, respectively. In a multivariate analysis, worse OS was associated with RT histology, elevated lactate dehydrogenase, and more prior lines of therapy. CAR T-cell therapy can salvage a proportion of patients with CLL and RT exposed to prior targeted agents; however, efficacy in RT is inferior compared to de novo LBCL and transformed iNHL.</p>","PeriodicalId":12964,"journal":{"name":"Haematologica","volume":" ","pages":"3566-3577"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11532690/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy has less efficacy in Richter transformation than in <I>de novo</I> large B-cell lymphoma and transformed low-grade B-cell lymphoma.\",\"authors\":\"Ohad Benjamini, Shalev Fried, Roni Shouval, Jessica R Flynn, Ofrat Beyar-Katz, Lori A Leslie, Tsilla Zucherman, Ronit Yerushalmi, Noga Shem-Tov, Maria Lia Palomba, Ivetta Danylesko, Inbal Sdayoor, Hila Malka, Orit Itzhaki, Hyung Suh, Sean M Devlin, Ronit Marcus, Parastoo B Dahi, Elad Jacoby, Gunjan L Shah, Craig S Sauter, Andrew Ip, Miguel-Angel Perales, Arnon Nagler, Avichai Shimoni, Michael Scordo, Abraham Avigdor\",\"doi\":\"10.3324/haematol.2023.284664\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The activity of anti-CD19 chimerci antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) with Richter's transformation (RT) to aggressive large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) is largely unknown. In a multicenter retrospective study, we report the safety and efficacy of CAR T-cell therapy in patients with RT (N=30) compared to patients with aggressive B-cell lymphoma (N=283) and patients with transformed indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (iNHL) (N=141) between April 2016 and January 2023. Two-thirds of patients received prior therapy for CLL before RT and 89% of them received B-cell receptor and B-cell lymphoma 2 inhibitors. Toxicities of CAR T-cell therapy in RT were similar to other lymphomas, with no fatalities related to cytokine release syndrome or immune effector-cell associated neurotoxicity synderome. The 100-day overall response rate and complete response rates in patients with RT were 57% and 47%, respectively. With a median follow-up of 19 months, the median overall survival (OS) was 9.9 months in patients with RT compared to 18 months in de novo LBCL and not reached in patients with transformed iNHL. The OS at 12 months was 45% in patients with RT compared with 62% and 75% in patients with de novo LBCL and transformed iNHL, respectively. In a multivariate analysis, worse OS was associated with RT histology, elevated lactate dehydrogenase, and more prior lines of therapy. CAR T-cell therapy can salvage a proportion of patients with CLL and RT exposed to prior targeted agents; however, efficacy in RT is inferior compared to de novo LBCL and transformed iNHL.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12964,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Haematologica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"3566-3577\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11532690/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Haematologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2023.284664\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Haematologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2023.284664","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

抗 CD19 CAR T 细胞疗法对里氏转化(RT)为侵袭性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤(LBCL)的慢性淋巴细胞白血病(CLL)的治疗效果尚不清楚。在一项多中心回顾性研究中,我们报告了2016年4月至2023年1月期间CAR T细胞疗法在RT患者(n=30)与侵袭性B细胞淋巴瘤患者(n=283)和转化性非霍奇金淋巴瘤(iNHL)患者(n=141)中的安全性和疗效。三分之二的患者在接受RT治疗前曾接受过CLL治疗,其中89%的患者接受过B细胞受体和B细胞淋巴瘤2(BCL-2)抑制剂治疗。CAR T细胞疗法在RT中的毒性与其他淋巴瘤相似,没有出现与细胞因子释放综合征或免疫效应细胞相关神经毒性综合征有关的死亡病例。RT患者的100天总体反应率和完全反应率分别为57%和47%。中位随访时间为19个月,RT患者的中位总生存期(OS)为9.9个月,而去原发性LBCL患者的中位总生存期为18个月,转化型iNHL患者的中位总生存期则未达到这一水平。RT患者12个月的OS为45%,而新生LBCL和转化型iNHL患者的OS分别为62%和75%。在一项多变量分析中,较差的OS与RT组织学、升高的LDH和更多的既往治疗方案有关。CAR T细胞疗法可以挽救一部分既往接受过靶向药物治疗的CLL和RT患者;但是,与新发LBCL和转化型iNHL相比,CAR T细胞疗法对RT的疗效较差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy has less efficacy in Richter transformation than in de novo large B-cell lymphoma and transformed low-grade B-cell lymphoma.

The activity of anti-CD19 chimerci antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) with Richter's transformation (RT) to aggressive large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) is largely unknown. In a multicenter retrospective study, we report the safety and efficacy of CAR T-cell therapy in patients with RT (N=30) compared to patients with aggressive B-cell lymphoma (N=283) and patients with transformed indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (iNHL) (N=141) between April 2016 and January 2023. Two-thirds of patients received prior therapy for CLL before RT and 89% of them received B-cell receptor and B-cell lymphoma 2 inhibitors. Toxicities of CAR T-cell therapy in RT were similar to other lymphomas, with no fatalities related to cytokine release syndrome or immune effector-cell associated neurotoxicity synderome. The 100-day overall response rate and complete response rates in patients with RT were 57% and 47%, respectively. With a median follow-up of 19 months, the median overall survival (OS) was 9.9 months in patients with RT compared to 18 months in de novo LBCL and not reached in patients with transformed iNHL. The OS at 12 months was 45% in patients with RT compared with 62% and 75% in patients with de novo LBCL and transformed iNHL, respectively. In a multivariate analysis, worse OS was associated with RT histology, elevated lactate dehydrogenase, and more prior lines of therapy. CAR T-cell therapy can salvage a proportion of patients with CLL and RT exposed to prior targeted agents; however, efficacy in RT is inferior compared to de novo LBCL and transformed iNHL.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Haematologica
Haematologica 医学-血液学
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
2.00%
发文量
349
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Haematologica is a journal that publishes articles within the broad field of hematology. It reports on novel findings in basic, clinical, and translational research. Scope: The scope of the journal includes reporting novel research results that: Have a significant impact on understanding normal hematology or the development of hematological diseases. Are likely to bring important changes to the diagnosis or treatment of hematological diseases.
期刊最新文献
Investigating the influence of germline ATM variants in chronic lymphocytic leukemia on cancer vulnerability. Optimization of T-cell replete haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: the Chinese experience. Acute myeloid leukemia drug tolerant persister cells survive chemotherapy by transiently increasing plasma membrane rigidity, that also increases their sensitivity to immune cell killing. Arkadia: a new player in hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell development. Calaspargase pegol and pegaspargase cause similar hepatosteatosis in mice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1