有腿筋拉伤史的腿部股二头肌肌腱较小。

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-08-30 DOI:10.1055/a-2348-2605
Thomas G Balshaw, Emmet J McDermott, Garry J Massey, Chris Hartley, Pui Wah Kong, Tom Maden-Wilkinson, Jonathan Folland
{"title":"有腿筋拉伤史的腿部股二头肌肌腱较小。","authors":"Thomas G Balshaw, Emmet J McDermott, Garry J Massey, Chris Hartley, Pui Wah Kong, Tom Maden-Wilkinson, Jonathan Folland","doi":"10.1055/a-2348-2605","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Biceps femoris long head (BF<sub>LH</sub>) aponeurosis size was compared between legs with and without prior hamstring strain injury (HSI) using two approaches: within-group (injured vs. uninjured legs of previous unilateral HSI athletes) and between-group (previously injured legs of HSI athletes vs. legs of No Prior HSI athletes). MRI scans were performed on currently healthy, competitive male athletes with Prior HSI history (<i>n</i>=23;≥1 verified BF<sub>LH</sub> injury; including a sub-group with unilateral HSI history; most recent HSI 1.6±1.2 years ago) and pair-matched athletes with No Prior HSI history (<i>n</i>=23). Anonymized axial images were manually segmented to quantify BF<sub>LH</sub> aponeurosis and muscle size. Prior unilateral HSI athletes' BF<sub>LH</sub> aponeurosis maximum width, aponeurosis area, and aponeurosis:muscle area ratio were 14.0-19.6% smaller in previously injured vs. contralateral uninjured legs (paired t-test, 0.008≤P≤0.044). BF<sub>LH</sub> aponeurosis maximum width and area were also 9.4-16.5% smaller in previously injured legs (<i>n</i>=28) from Prior HSI athletes vs. legs (<i>n</i>=46) of No Prior HSI athletes (unpaired t-test, 0.001≤P≤0.044). BF<sub>LH</sub> aponeurosis size was smaller in legs with prior HSI vs. those without prior HSI. These findings suggest BF<sub>LH</sub> aponeurosis size, especially maximum width, could be a potential cause or consequence of HSI, with prospective evidence needed to support or refute these possibilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Smaller Biceps Femoris Aponeurosis Size in Legs with a History of Hamstring Strain Injury.\",\"authors\":\"Thomas G Balshaw, Emmet J McDermott, Garry J Massey, Chris Hartley, Pui Wah Kong, Tom Maden-Wilkinson, Jonathan Folland\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2348-2605\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Biceps femoris long head (BF<sub>LH</sub>) aponeurosis size was compared between legs with and without prior hamstring strain injury (HSI) using two approaches: within-group (injured vs. uninjured legs of previous unilateral HSI athletes) and between-group (previously injured legs of HSI athletes vs. legs of No Prior HSI athletes). MRI scans were performed on currently healthy, competitive male athletes with Prior HSI history (<i>n</i>=23;≥1 verified BF<sub>LH</sub> injury; including a sub-group with unilateral HSI history; most recent HSI 1.6±1.2 years ago) and pair-matched athletes with No Prior HSI history (<i>n</i>=23). Anonymized axial images were manually segmented to quantify BF<sub>LH</sub> aponeurosis and muscle size. Prior unilateral HSI athletes' BF<sub>LH</sub> aponeurosis maximum width, aponeurosis area, and aponeurosis:muscle area ratio were 14.0-19.6% smaller in previously injured vs. contralateral uninjured legs (paired t-test, 0.008≤P≤0.044). BF<sub>LH</sub> aponeurosis maximum width and area were also 9.4-16.5% smaller in previously injured legs (<i>n</i>=28) from Prior HSI athletes vs. legs (<i>n</i>=46) of No Prior HSI athletes (unpaired t-test, 0.001≤P≤0.044). BF<sub>LH</sub> aponeurosis size was smaller in legs with prior HSI vs. those without prior HSI. These findings suggest BF<sub>LH</sub> aponeurosis size, especially maximum width, could be a potential cause or consequence of HSI, with prospective evidence needed to support or refute these possibilities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2348-2605\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2348-2605","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

采用组内(之前单侧 HSI 运动员受伤的腿与未受伤的腿)和组间(之前 HSI 运动员受伤的腿与没有 HSI 运动员的腿)方法,比较了有和没有之前腿筋拉伤(HSI)的腿的股二头肌长头(BFLH)肌腱大小。对目前健康的、有过 HSI 史的男性竞技运动员(23 人;≥1 次经证实的 BFLH 损伤;包括有单侧 HSI 史的子组;最近一次 HSI 是在 1.6 ± 1.2 年前)和无 HSI 史的配对运动员(23 人)进行核磁共振扫描。对匿名轴向图像进行人工分割,以量化BFLH肌腱和肌肉的大小。与对侧未受损伤的腿部相比,之前受过伤的单侧 HSI 运动员的 BFLH 神经节最大宽度、神经节面积和神经节:肌肉面积比小 14.0-19.6%(配对 t 检验,0.008≤p≤0.044)。在以前受过伤的腿部(n=28)与未受过伤的腿部(n=46)之间,以前受过伤的恒指运动员与未受过伤的恒指运动员的腿部(非配对t检验,0.001≤p≤0.044)的BFLH肌腱最大宽度和面积也要小9.4-16.5%。与无HSI前科的运动员相比,有HSI前科的运动员腿部的BFLH肌腱尺寸较小。这些研究结果表明,BFLH肌腱的大小,尤其是最大宽度,可能是HSI的潜在原因或结果,需要前瞻性证据来支持或反驳这些可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Smaller Biceps Femoris Aponeurosis Size in Legs with a History of Hamstring Strain Injury.

Biceps femoris long head (BFLH) aponeurosis size was compared between legs with and without prior hamstring strain injury (HSI) using two approaches: within-group (injured vs. uninjured legs of previous unilateral HSI athletes) and between-group (previously injured legs of HSI athletes vs. legs of No Prior HSI athletes). MRI scans were performed on currently healthy, competitive male athletes with Prior HSI history (n=23;≥1 verified BFLH injury; including a sub-group with unilateral HSI history; most recent HSI 1.6±1.2 years ago) and pair-matched athletes with No Prior HSI history (n=23). Anonymized axial images were manually segmented to quantify BFLH aponeurosis and muscle size. Prior unilateral HSI athletes' BFLH aponeurosis maximum width, aponeurosis area, and aponeurosis:muscle area ratio were 14.0-19.6% smaller in previously injured vs. contralateral uninjured legs (paired t-test, 0.008≤P≤0.044). BFLH aponeurosis maximum width and area were also 9.4-16.5% smaller in previously injured legs (n=28) from Prior HSI athletes vs. legs (n=46) of No Prior HSI athletes (unpaired t-test, 0.001≤P≤0.044). BFLH aponeurosis size was smaller in legs with prior HSI vs. those without prior HSI. These findings suggest BFLH aponeurosis size, especially maximum width, could be a potential cause or consequence of HSI, with prospective evidence needed to support or refute these possibilities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1