[农业环境中抗生素的风险评估]。

Q2 Environmental Science Huanjing Kexue/Environmental Science Pub Date : 2024-06-08 DOI:10.13227/j.hjkx.202305275
Zhen-Zhen Yang, Hong-Na Li, Na Li
{"title":"[农业环境中抗生素的风险评估]。","authors":"Zhen-Zhen Yang, Hong-Na Li, Na Li","doi":"10.13227/j.hjkx.202305275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Antibiotics are widely used in animal husbandry, planting, and aquaculture in agricultural industries. A large amount of the parent antibiotics used are released into the environment through discharge via feces and urine, posing potential risks to human health and ecosystems. It is thus very important to understand how antibiotics in the agricultural environment threaten the ecological environment and human health. Accordingly, risk assessment of antibiotics in the environment has become the research focus in recent years. The aim of this study was to review the risk assessment methods of antibiotics. The results showed that the ecological environment risk has mainly been assessed by the risk quotient (RQ). Predicted no-impact concentrations (PNECs) are an important indicator for ecological environment risk assessment, but a definite value is still controversial. The hazard quotient (HQ) is generally used to assess health risks. At present, it is necessary to clarify the selection of antibiotic exposure pathways and toxicological thresholds. However, neither of these two methods have currently considered either mixed pollution or the risk of antibiotic metabolites. Further analysis indicated that the ecological risks of antibiotics in the water environment and feces/manure/soil environment were widespread, which had an impact on both the soil and water environment. The types of antibiotics with high risk were different for various cultivated types. The factors including test species, testing conditions, calculation methods, and soil types all affected the detection of PNECs. Human health risk caused by dietary intake of antibiotics was minimal, but it cannot be ignored given the seafood consumption in coastal areas. Moreover, quinolones have both high ecological and human health risks in the agricultural environment. Based on the amount of antibiotics in agriculture and the residual concentration or toxicity of antibiotics in the related environment, this study proposed a priority-control list of antibiotics in the agricultural environment and summarized the main problems in the current antibiotic risk assessment. It will provide helpful support for the scientific optimization of antibiotic risk assessment and the effective control of antibiotics in agricultural environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":35937,"journal":{"name":"Huanjing Kexue/Environmental Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Risk Assessment of Antibiotics in Agricultural Environment].\",\"authors\":\"Zhen-Zhen Yang, Hong-Na Li, Na Li\",\"doi\":\"10.13227/j.hjkx.202305275\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Antibiotics are widely used in animal husbandry, planting, and aquaculture in agricultural industries. A large amount of the parent antibiotics used are released into the environment through discharge via feces and urine, posing potential risks to human health and ecosystems. It is thus very important to understand how antibiotics in the agricultural environment threaten the ecological environment and human health. Accordingly, risk assessment of antibiotics in the environment has become the research focus in recent years. The aim of this study was to review the risk assessment methods of antibiotics. The results showed that the ecological environment risk has mainly been assessed by the risk quotient (RQ). Predicted no-impact concentrations (PNECs) are an important indicator for ecological environment risk assessment, but a definite value is still controversial. The hazard quotient (HQ) is generally used to assess health risks. At present, it is necessary to clarify the selection of antibiotic exposure pathways and toxicological thresholds. However, neither of these two methods have currently considered either mixed pollution or the risk of antibiotic metabolites. Further analysis indicated that the ecological risks of antibiotics in the water environment and feces/manure/soil environment were widespread, which had an impact on both the soil and water environment. The types of antibiotics with high risk were different for various cultivated types. The factors including test species, testing conditions, calculation methods, and soil types all affected the detection of PNECs. Human health risk caused by dietary intake of antibiotics was minimal, but it cannot be ignored given the seafood consumption in coastal areas. Moreover, quinolones have both high ecological and human health risks in the agricultural environment. Based on the amount of antibiotics in agriculture and the residual concentration or toxicity of antibiotics in the related environment, this study proposed a priority-control list of antibiotics in the agricultural environment and summarized the main problems in the current antibiotic risk assessment. It will provide helpful support for the scientific optimization of antibiotic risk assessment and the effective control of antibiotics in agricultural environments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35937,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Huanjing Kexue/Environmental Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Huanjing Kexue/Environmental Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1087\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.202305275\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Environmental Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Huanjing Kexue/Environmental Science","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.202305275","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

抗生素被广泛应用于农业中的畜牧业、种植业和水产养殖业。所使用的大量抗生素母体通过粪便和尿液排放到环境中,对人类健康和生态系统构成潜在风险。因此,了解农业环境中的抗生素如何威胁生态环境和人类健康非常重要。因此,对环境中的抗生素进行风险评估已成为近年来的研究重点。本研究旨在回顾抗生素的风险评估方法。结果表明,生态环境风险评估主要采用风险商数(RQ)。预测无影响浓度(PNECs)是生态环境风险评估的一个重要指标,但其确定值仍存在争议。危害商数(HQ)一般用于评估健康风险。目前,有必要明确抗生素暴露途径和毒理学阈值的选择。然而,这两种方法目前都没有考虑混合污染或抗生素代谢物的风险。进一步分析表明,抗生素在水环境和粪便/粪便/土壤环境中的生态风险普遍存在,对土壤和水环境都有影响。在不同的栽培类型中,高风险抗生素的种类也不同。检测物种、检测条件、计算方法和土壤类型等因素都会影响 PNECs 的检测。从膳食中摄入抗生素对人类健康造成的风险很小,但考虑到沿海地区海产品的消费量,这种风险不容忽视。此外,喹诺酮类药物在农业环境中具有很高的生态风险和人类健康风险。本研究根据农业环境中抗生素的用量以及抗生素在相关环境中的残留浓度或毒性,提出了农业环境中抗生素的优先控制清单,并总结了当前抗生素风险评估中存在的主要问题。这将为科学优化抗生素风险评估、有效控制农业环境中的抗生素提供有益支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Risk Assessment of Antibiotics in Agricultural Environment].

Antibiotics are widely used in animal husbandry, planting, and aquaculture in agricultural industries. A large amount of the parent antibiotics used are released into the environment through discharge via feces and urine, posing potential risks to human health and ecosystems. It is thus very important to understand how antibiotics in the agricultural environment threaten the ecological environment and human health. Accordingly, risk assessment of antibiotics in the environment has become the research focus in recent years. The aim of this study was to review the risk assessment methods of antibiotics. The results showed that the ecological environment risk has mainly been assessed by the risk quotient (RQ). Predicted no-impact concentrations (PNECs) are an important indicator for ecological environment risk assessment, but a definite value is still controversial. The hazard quotient (HQ) is generally used to assess health risks. At present, it is necessary to clarify the selection of antibiotic exposure pathways and toxicological thresholds. However, neither of these two methods have currently considered either mixed pollution or the risk of antibiotic metabolites. Further analysis indicated that the ecological risks of antibiotics in the water environment and feces/manure/soil environment were widespread, which had an impact on both the soil and water environment. The types of antibiotics with high risk were different for various cultivated types. The factors including test species, testing conditions, calculation methods, and soil types all affected the detection of PNECs. Human health risk caused by dietary intake of antibiotics was minimal, but it cannot be ignored given the seafood consumption in coastal areas. Moreover, quinolones have both high ecological and human health risks in the agricultural environment. Based on the amount of antibiotics in agriculture and the residual concentration or toxicity of antibiotics in the related environment, this study proposed a priority-control list of antibiotics in the agricultural environment and summarized the main problems in the current antibiotic risk assessment. It will provide helpful support for the scientific optimization of antibiotic risk assessment and the effective control of antibiotics in agricultural environments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Huanjing Kexue/Environmental Science
Huanjing Kexue/Environmental Science Environmental Science-Environmental Science (all)
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15329
期刊最新文献
[Source and Influencing Factor Analysis of Soil Heavy Metals Based on PMF Model and GeoDetector]. [Spatial and Temporal Changes in Habitat Quality and Driving Forces in Typical Loess Hill and Gully Areas:A Case Study of the Zuli River Basin]. [A Method for Fine Mapping of Carbon Emissions from Regional Land Use Change and Its Application]. [Analysis of Spatial Distribution of Ecosystem Services and Driving Factors in Northeast China]. [Analysis of Spatiotemporal Differences and Influencing Factors of Land Use Carbon Emissions in Ningxia].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1