使用经宫颈福里球囊进行诱导前宫颈成熟术的患者中,早期羊膜切开术与延迟羊膜切开术的比较:荟萃分析

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ajogmf.2024.101408
{"title":"使用经宫颈福里球囊进行诱导前宫颈成熟术的患者中,早期羊膜切开术与延迟羊膜切开术的比较:荟萃分析","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ajogmf.2024.101408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>OBJECTIVES</h3><p>To systematically review randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and perform a meta-analysis comparing early amniotomy with delayed amniotomy in individuals undergoing pre-induction cervical ripening by Foley balloon. The primary outcome was the rate of cesarean delivery. Understanding the impact of the timing of amniotomy on the rate of cesarean delivery is crucial for obstetricians and healthcare providers when making decisions about the management of labor induction.</p></div><div><h3>DATA SOURCES</h3><p>Data were sourced from electronic databases, including PubMed, OVID, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov through February 2024. The review adhered to Preferred Reporting Item for Systematic Reviews guidelines and registered with PROSPERO (ID CRD42023454520).</p></div><div><h3>STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA</h3><p>Inclusion criteria comprised RCTs comparing early amniotomy with delayed amniotomy in individuals undergoing cervical ripening by Foley balloon. Early amniotomy was defined as amniotomy soon after cervical ripening. Delayed amniotomy was defined as withholding amniotomy until after the onset of the active phase of labor, until at least 4 hours from either initiation of oxytocin or Foley balloon removal/expulsion, or until achieving &gt;4 cm of dilation. Participants included nulliparous or multiparous individuals with singleton pregnancies undergoing labor induction at 37 weeks or later.</p></div><div><h3>STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS</h3><p>A systematic literature search was conducted using defined search terms including “early amniotomy,” “delayed amniotomy,” “induction of labor,” “cervical ripening,” and “Foley balloon,” and “Foley catheter.” The quality of the included trials was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for randomized controlled trials. The primary outcome was cesarean delivery. Secondary outcomes included outcomes related to labor duration and neonatal outcomes. Pooled relative risks (RR) and weighted mean differences (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals were calculated.</p></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><p>Five trials involving 849 participants undergoing induction and cervical ripening by Foley balloon were included. The rate of cesarean delivery did not differ between individuals randomly assigned to the early amniotomy group compared with those assigned to the delayed amniotomy group (22.9% vs. 23.3%; RR 1.00; 95% CI 0.65–1.55). Early amniotomy compared to delayed amniotomy was associated with a higher proportion of delivery within 24 hours (79.9% vs. 67.1%; RR 1.19; 95% CI 1.04–1.36). Early amniotomy compared with delayed amniotomy was associated with a shorter interval from oxytocin to delivery (WMD -1.5 hours; 95% CI -2.1 to -0.8), from Foley expulsion to vaginal delivery (WMD -2.5 hours; 95% CI -4.8 to -0.1), and from the start of oxytocin to vaginal delivery (WMD -1.8 hours; 95% CI -3.2 to -0.4). Other outcomes were not significantly different.</p></div><div><h3>CONCLUSION</h3><p>Early amniotomy following cervical ripening by Foley balloon in individuals with singleton pregnancies did not impact rates of cesarean delivery compared with delayed amniotomy but led to shorter duration for various labor progress outcomes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36186,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Early vs. delayed amniotomy in individuals undergoing pre-induction cervical ripening with transcervical Foley balloon: a meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajogmf.2024.101408\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>OBJECTIVES</h3><p>To systematically review randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and perform a meta-analysis comparing early amniotomy with delayed amniotomy in individuals undergoing pre-induction cervical ripening by Foley balloon. The primary outcome was the rate of cesarean delivery. Understanding the impact of the timing of amniotomy on the rate of cesarean delivery is crucial for obstetricians and healthcare providers when making decisions about the management of labor induction.</p></div><div><h3>DATA SOURCES</h3><p>Data were sourced from electronic databases, including PubMed, OVID, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov through February 2024. The review adhered to Preferred Reporting Item for Systematic Reviews guidelines and registered with PROSPERO (ID CRD42023454520).</p></div><div><h3>STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA</h3><p>Inclusion criteria comprised RCTs comparing early amniotomy with delayed amniotomy in individuals undergoing cervical ripening by Foley balloon. Early amniotomy was defined as amniotomy soon after cervical ripening. Delayed amniotomy was defined as withholding amniotomy until after the onset of the active phase of labor, until at least 4 hours from either initiation of oxytocin or Foley balloon removal/expulsion, or until achieving &gt;4 cm of dilation. Participants included nulliparous or multiparous individuals with singleton pregnancies undergoing labor induction at 37 weeks or later.</p></div><div><h3>STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS</h3><p>A systematic literature search was conducted using defined search terms including “early amniotomy,” “delayed amniotomy,” “induction of labor,” “cervical ripening,” and “Foley balloon,” and “Foley catheter.” The quality of the included trials was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for randomized controlled trials. The primary outcome was cesarean delivery. Secondary outcomes included outcomes related to labor duration and neonatal outcomes. Pooled relative risks (RR) and weighted mean differences (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals were calculated.</p></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><p>Five trials involving 849 participants undergoing induction and cervical ripening by Foley balloon were included. The rate of cesarean delivery did not differ between individuals randomly assigned to the early amniotomy group compared with those assigned to the delayed amniotomy group (22.9% vs. 23.3%; RR 1.00; 95% CI 0.65–1.55). Early amniotomy compared to delayed amniotomy was associated with a higher proportion of delivery within 24 hours (79.9% vs. 67.1%; RR 1.19; 95% CI 1.04–1.36). Early amniotomy compared with delayed amniotomy was associated with a shorter interval from oxytocin to delivery (WMD -1.5 hours; 95% CI -2.1 to -0.8), from Foley expulsion to vaginal delivery (WMD -2.5 hours; 95% CI -4.8 to -0.1), and from the start of oxytocin to vaginal delivery (WMD -1.8 hours; 95% CI -3.2 to -0.4). Other outcomes were not significantly different.</p></div><div><h3>CONCLUSION</h3><p>Early amniotomy following cervical ripening by Foley balloon in individuals with singleton pregnancies did not impact rates of cesarean delivery compared with delayed amniotomy but led to shorter duration for various labor progress outcomes.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36186,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589933324001344\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589933324001344","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的系统回顾随机对照试验(RCT),并进行荟萃分析,比较早期羊膜腔切开术和延迟羊膜腔切开术对通过 Foley 球囊进行诱导前宫颈成熟的患者的效果。主要结果是剖宫产率。了解羊膜腔切开术的时间对剖宫产率的影响对产科医生和医疗服务提供者做出引产管理决策至关重要:数据来源于电子数据库,包括 PubMed、OVID、Cochrane Library、Web of Science 和 ClinicalTrials.gov,截止日期为 2024 年 2 月。该综述遵守了系统综述首选报告项目指南,并在 PROSPERO(ID CRD42023454520)上进行了注册:纳入标准包括比较早期羊膜腔切开术与延迟羊膜腔切开术的 RCT 研究。早期羊膜腔切开术的定义是在宫颈成熟后不久进行羊膜腔切开术。延迟羊膜腔切开术的定义是在分娩活跃期开始后、催产素开始或福来球取出/拔出至少4小时后或宫口扩张>4厘米前暂停羊膜腔切开术。参与者包括37周或37周以后接受引产手术的单胎妊娠的无产妇或多产妇:使用定义的检索词进行了系统性文献检索,包括 "早期羊膜腔切开术"、"延迟羊膜腔切开术"、"引产"、"宫颈成熟"、"福来球囊 "和 "福来导管"。纳入试验的质量采用科克伦随机对照试验偏倚风险工具(Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool)进行评估。主要结果为剖宫产。次要结果包括与产程和新生儿结局相关的结果。计算了合并相对风险(RR)和加权平均差(WMD)及95%置信区间:结果:共纳入了5项试验,涉及849名接受引产和宫颈成熟术的患者。随机分配到早期羊膜切开术组与延迟羊膜切开术组的剖宫产率没有差异(22.9% vs 23.3%;RR 1.00;95%CI,0.65-1.55)。早期羊膜切开术与延迟羊膜切开术相比,24 小时内分娩的比例更高(79.9% 对 67.1%;RR 1.19;95%CI 1.04-1.36)。早期羊膜腔切开术与延迟羊膜腔切开术相比,从催产素到分娩(WMD -1.5小时;95%CI -2.1--0.8)、从Foley排出到阴道分娩(WMD -2.5小时;95%CI -4.8--0.1)以及从催产素开始到阴道分娩(WMD -1.8小时;95%CI -3.2--0.4)的时间间隔更短。其他结果无明显差异:结论:与延迟羊膜切开术相比,单胎妊娠患者通过福里球囊使宫颈成熟后尽早进行羊膜切开术不会影响剖宫产率,但会缩短各种分娩进展结果的持续时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Early vs. delayed amniotomy in individuals undergoing pre-induction cervical ripening with transcervical Foley balloon: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To systematically review randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and perform a meta-analysis comparing early amniotomy with delayed amniotomy in individuals undergoing pre-induction cervical ripening by Foley balloon. The primary outcome was the rate of cesarean delivery. Understanding the impact of the timing of amniotomy on the rate of cesarean delivery is crucial for obstetricians and healthcare providers when making decisions about the management of labor induction.

DATA SOURCES

Data were sourced from electronic databases, including PubMed, OVID, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov through February 2024. The review adhered to Preferred Reporting Item for Systematic Reviews guidelines and registered with PROSPERO (ID CRD42023454520).

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Inclusion criteria comprised RCTs comparing early amniotomy with delayed amniotomy in individuals undergoing cervical ripening by Foley balloon. Early amniotomy was defined as amniotomy soon after cervical ripening. Delayed amniotomy was defined as withholding amniotomy until after the onset of the active phase of labor, until at least 4 hours from either initiation of oxytocin or Foley balloon removal/expulsion, or until achieving >4 cm of dilation. Participants included nulliparous or multiparous individuals with singleton pregnancies undergoing labor induction at 37 weeks or later.

STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS

A systematic literature search was conducted using defined search terms including “early amniotomy,” “delayed amniotomy,” “induction of labor,” “cervical ripening,” and “Foley balloon,” and “Foley catheter.” The quality of the included trials was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for randomized controlled trials. The primary outcome was cesarean delivery. Secondary outcomes included outcomes related to labor duration and neonatal outcomes. Pooled relative risks (RR) and weighted mean differences (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals were calculated.

RESULTS

Five trials involving 849 participants undergoing induction and cervical ripening by Foley balloon were included. The rate of cesarean delivery did not differ between individuals randomly assigned to the early amniotomy group compared with those assigned to the delayed amniotomy group (22.9% vs. 23.3%; RR 1.00; 95% CI 0.65–1.55). Early amniotomy compared to delayed amniotomy was associated with a higher proportion of delivery within 24 hours (79.9% vs. 67.1%; RR 1.19; 95% CI 1.04–1.36). Early amniotomy compared with delayed amniotomy was associated with a shorter interval from oxytocin to delivery (WMD -1.5 hours; 95% CI -2.1 to -0.8), from Foley expulsion to vaginal delivery (WMD -2.5 hours; 95% CI -4.8 to -0.1), and from the start of oxytocin to vaginal delivery (WMD -1.8 hours; 95% CI -3.2 to -0.4). Other outcomes were not significantly different.

CONCLUSION

Early amniotomy following cervical ripening by Foley balloon in individuals with singleton pregnancies did not impact rates of cesarean delivery compared with delayed amniotomy but led to shorter duration for various labor progress outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
254
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (AJOG) is a highly esteemed publication with two companion titles. One of these is the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Maternal-Fetal Medicine (AJOG MFM), which is dedicated to the latest research in the field of maternal-fetal medicine, specifically concerning high-risk pregnancies. The journal encompasses a wide range of topics, including: Maternal Complications: It addresses significant studies that have the potential to change clinical practice regarding complications faced by pregnant women. Fetal Complications: The journal covers prenatal diagnosis, ultrasound, and genetic issues related to the fetus, providing insights into the management and care of fetal health. Prenatal Care: It discusses the best practices in prenatal care to ensure the health and well-being of both the mother and the unborn child. Intrapartum Care: It provides guidance on the care provided during the childbirth process, which is critical for the safety of both mother and baby. Postpartum Issues: The journal also tackles issues that arise after childbirth, focusing on the postpartum period and its implications for maternal health. AJOG MFM serves as a reliable forum for peer-reviewed research, with a preference for randomized trials and meta-analyses. The goal is to equip researchers and clinicians with the most current information and evidence-based strategies to effectively manage high-risk pregnancies and to provide the best possible care for mothers and their unborn children.
期刊最新文献
Activity restriction and risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes Oxytocin regimen used for induction of labor and pregnancy outcomes. Results of the RE-DINO multicenter randomized trial on the repeated use of vaginal dinoprostone (Propess®) for labor induction in patients at term. Corrigendum to ‘Prevention of preterm birth in twin pregnancies’ American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM/ Volume 4 (2022) 100551 Validation of the PROMIS© Medication Adherence Scale for Pregnant Patients Taking Aspirin.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1