患者对强迫症病因和治疗偏好的看法:一项混合方法研究

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 ANTHROPOLOGY Culture Medicine and Psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-19 DOI:10.1007/s11013-024-09865-5
Neil Krishan Aggarwal, Shima Sadaghiyani, Schahryar Kananian, Peter Lam, Gabrielle Messner, Clara Marincowitz, Madhuri Narayan, Alan Campos Luciano, Anton J L M van Balkom, Dianne Hezel, Christine Lochner, Roseli Gedanke Shavitt, Odile A van den Heuvel, Blair Simpson, Roberto Lewis-Fernández
{"title":"患者对强迫症病因和治疗偏好的看法:一项混合方法研究","authors":"Neil Krishan Aggarwal, Shima Sadaghiyani, Schahryar Kananian, Peter Lam, Gabrielle Messner, Clara Marincowitz, Madhuri Narayan, Alan Campos Luciano, Anton J L M van Balkom, Dianne Hezel, Christine Lochner, Roseli Gedanke Shavitt, Odile A van den Heuvel, Blair Simpson, Roberto Lewis-Fernández","doi":"10.1007/s11013-024-09865-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a condition with high patient morbidity and mortality. Research shows that eliciting patient explanations about illness causes and treatment preferences promotes cross-cultural work and engagement in health services. These topics are in the Cultural Formulation Interview (CFI), a semi-structured interview first published in DSM-5 that applies anthropological approaches within mental health services to promote person-centered care. This study focuses on the New York City site of an international multi-site study that used qualitative-quantitative mixed methods to: (1) analyze CFI transcripts with 55 adults with OCD to explore perceived illness causes and treatment preferences, and (2) explore whether past treatment experiences are related to perceptions about causes of current symptoms. The most commonly named causes were circumstantial stressors (n = 16), genetics (n = 12), personal psychological traits (n = 9), an interaction between circumstantial stressors and participants' brains (n = 6), and a non-specific brain problem (n = 6). The most common treatment preferences were psychotherapy (n = 42), anything (n = 4), nothing (n = 4), and medications (n = 2). Those with a prior medication history had twice the odds of reporting a biological cause, though this was not a statistically significant difference. Our findings suggest that providers should ask patients about illness causes and treatment preferences to guide treatment choice.</p>","PeriodicalId":47634,"journal":{"name":"Culture Medicine and Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"591-613"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient Perceptions of Illness Causes and Treatment Preferences for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: A Mixed-Methods Study.\",\"authors\":\"Neil Krishan Aggarwal, Shima Sadaghiyani, Schahryar Kananian, Peter Lam, Gabrielle Messner, Clara Marincowitz, Madhuri Narayan, Alan Campos Luciano, Anton J L M van Balkom, Dianne Hezel, Christine Lochner, Roseli Gedanke Shavitt, Odile A van den Heuvel, Blair Simpson, Roberto Lewis-Fernández\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11013-024-09865-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a condition with high patient morbidity and mortality. Research shows that eliciting patient explanations about illness causes and treatment preferences promotes cross-cultural work and engagement in health services. These topics are in the Cultural Formulation Interview (CFI), a semi-structured interview first published in DSM-5 that applies anthropological approaches within mental health services to promote person-centered care. This study focuses on the New York City site of an international multi-site study that used qualitative-quantitative mixed methods to: (1) analyze CFI transcripts with 55 adults with OCD to explore perceived illness causes and treatment preferences, and (2) explore whether past treatment experiences are related to perceptions about causes of current symptoms. The most commonly named causes were circumstantial stressors (n = 16), genetics (n = 12), personal psychological traits (n = 9), an interaction between circumstantial stressors and participants' brains (n = 6), and a non-specific brain problem (n = 6). The most common treatment preferences were psychotherapy (n = 42), anything (n = 4), nothing (n = 4), and medications (n = 2). Those with a prior medication history had twice the odds of reporting a biological cause, though this was not a statistically significant difference. Our findings suggest that providers should ask patients about illness causes and treatment preferences to guide treatment choice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47634,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Culture Medicine and Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"591-613\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Culture Medicine and Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11013-024-09865-5\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Culture Medicine and Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11013-024-09865-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

强迫症(OCD)是一种患者发病率和死亡率都很高的疾病。研究表明,诱导患者解释病因和治疗偏好可促进跨文化工作和参与医疗服务。这些主题都包含在 "文化表述访谈"(Cultural Formulation Interview,CFI)中,这是一种半结构式访谈,首次发表于 DSM-5,它将人类学方法应用于心理健康服务中,以促进以人为本的护理。本研究侧重于一项国际多站点研究的纽约市站点,该研究采用定性-定量混合方法:(1) 分析 55 名成人强迫症患者的 CFI 访谈记录,以探索患者感知到的疾病原因和治疗偏好;(2) 探索过去的治疗经历是否与患者对当前症状原因的感知有关。最常见的病因是环境压力因素(16 人)、遗传(12 人)、个人心理特征(9 人)、环境压力因素与参与者大脑之间的相互作用(6 人)以及非特异性大脑问题(6 人)。最常见的治疗偏好是心理治疗(42 人)、任何治疗(4 人)、不治疗(4 人)和药物治疗(2 人)。有过用药史的患者报告生物原因的几率是其他患者的两倍,但这一差异在统计学上并不显著。我们的研究结果表明,医疗服务提供者应询问患者的病因和治疗偏好,以指导治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Patient Perceptions of Illness Causes and Treatment Preferences for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: A Mixed-Methods Study.

Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a condition with high patient morbidity and mortality. Research shows that eliciting patient explanations about illness causes and treatment preferences promotes cross-cultural work and engagement in health services. These topics are in the Cultural Formulation Interview (CFI), a semi-structured interview first published in DSM-5 that applies anthropological approaches within mental health services to promote person-centered care. This study focuses on the New York City site of an international multi-site study that used qualitative-quantitative mixed methods to: (1) analyze CFI transcripts with 55 adults with OCD to explore perceived illness causes and treatment preferences, and (2) explore whether past treatment experiences are related to perceptions about causes of current symptoms. The most commonly named causes were circumstantial stressors (n = 16), genetics (n = 12), personal psychological traits (n = 9), an interaction between circumstantial stressors and participants' brains (n = 6), and a non-specific brain problem (n = 6). The most common treatment preferences were psychotherapy (n = 42), anything (n = 4), nothing (n = 4), and medications (n = 2). Those with a prior medication history had twice the odds of reporting a biological cause, though this was not a statistically significant difference. Our findings suggest that providers should ask patients about illness causes and treatment preferences to guide treatment choice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.90%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry is an international and interdisciplinary forum for the publication of work in three interrelated fields: medical and psychiatric anthropology, cross-cultural psychiatry, and related cross-societal and clinical epidemiological studies. The journal publishes original research, and theoretical papers based on original research, on all subjects in each of these fields. Interdisciplinary work which bridges anthropological and medical perspectives and methods which are clinically relevant are particularly welcome, as is research on the cultural context of normative and deviant behavior, including the anthropological, epidemiological and clinical aspects of the subject. Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry also fosters systematic and wide-ranging examinations of the significance of culture in health care, including comparisons of how the concept of culture is operationalized in anthropological and medical disciplines. With the increasing emphasis on the cultural diversity of society, which finds its reflection in many facets of our day to day life, including health care, Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry is required reading in anthropology, psychiatry and general health care libraries.
期刊最新文献
Psychiatric Experiments with "Community" Under Dictatorship and Authoritarianism: The Case of the Protected Commune Experience, 1980-1989. Training in Cultural Competence for Mental Health Care: A Mixed-Methods Study of Students, Faculty, and Practitioners from India and USA. Medical Returnees: Somali Canadians Seeking Psychosocial and Spiritual Care in East Africa. The Evolution of Symbolic Thought: At the Intersection of Schizophrenia Psychopathology, Ethnoarchaeology, and Neuroscience. Infertility as Trauma: Understanding the Lived Experience of Involuntary Childlessness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1