Rosalie Ea Morrish, Alec T Chunta, Brooke L Belanger, Paige M Croney, M Suheel Abdul Salam, Crista Thompson, Muneer Eesa, John H Wong, Alim P Mitha
{"title":"ReSolv 分流支架在兔模型中的血管造影安全性和有效性","authors":"Rosalie Ea Morrish, Alec T Chunta, Brooke L Belanger, Paige M Croney, M Suheel Abdul Salam, Crista Thompson, Muneer Eesa, John H Wong, Alim P Mitha","doi":"10.1177/15910199241260896","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bioresorbable polymer-based flow-diverting stents have potential benefits over existing metal devices. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the novel ReSolv device, which is a primarily polymer-based flow-diverting stent, using the in vivo rabbit sidewall saccular aneurysm model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>ReSolv stents were deployed in 14 New Zealand White rabbits that had undergone aneurysm creation procedures. Animals were allocated to follow-up time points of 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 16, or 18 months. Angiographic images were evaluated by an independent neurointerventionalist blinded to follow-up time points for (1) in-stent stenosis, (2) parent vessel and jailed side branch patency, (3) wall apposition, and (4) aneurysm occlusion using the Raymond-Roy Occlusion Classification (RROC), O'Kelly Marotta grading scale, and the 4F flow diversion predictive score. Primary efficacy outcome was defined as RROC Class I or II.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At a median follow-up time of 7.5 months, parent vessel (14/14) and jailed side (33/33) branches were patent in all cases. There was no development of thrombus on the stent or cases of significant in-stent stenosis, and all stents had good wall apposition. Adequate occlusion was found in 85.7% (<i>n</i> = 12) of animals, including an RROC Class I in 64.3% (<i>n</i> = 9) and RROC Class II in 21.4% (<i>n</i> = 3).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The ReSolv stent shows encouraging angiographic safety and efficacy outcomes after placement in a rabbit sidewall saccular aneurysm model. Longer term studies are ongoing to determine eventual fate of the aneurysm, parent vessel, and jailed side branches after absorption of the polymer component of the stent.</p>","PeriodicalId":49174,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"15910199241260896"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11571144/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Angiographic Safety and Efficacy of the ReSolv Flow-Diverting Stent in a Rabbit Model.\",\"authors\":\"Rosalie Ea Morrish, Alec T Chunta, Brooke L Belanger, Paige M Croney, M Suheel Abdul Salam, Crista Thompson, Muneer Eesa, John H Wong, Alim P Mitha\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15910199241260896\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bioresorbable polymer-based flow-diverting stents have potential benefits over existing metal devices. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the novel ReSolv device, which is a primarily polymer-based flow-diverting stent, using the in vivo rabbit sidewall saccular aneurysm model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>ReSolv stents were deployed in 14 New Zealand White rabbits that had undergone aneurysm creation procedures. Animals were allocated to follow-up time points of 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 16, or 18 months. Angiographic images were evaluated by an independent neurointerventionalist blinded to follow-up time points for (1) in-stent stenosis, (2) parent vessel and jailed side branch patency, (3) wall apposition, and (4) aneurysm occlusion using the Raymond-Roy Occlusion Classification (RROC), O'Kelly Marotta grading scale, and the 4F flow diversion predictive score. Primary efficacy outcome was defined as RROC Class I or II.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At a median follow-up time of 7.5 months, parent vessel (14/14) and jailed side (33/33) branches were patent in all cases. There was no development of thrombus on the stent or cases of significant in-stent stenosis, and all stents had good wall apposition. Adequate occlusion was found in 85.7% (<i>n</i> = 12) of animals, including an RROC Class I in 64.3% (<i>n</i> = 9) and RROC Class II in 21.4% (<i>n</i> = 3).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The ReSolv stent shows encouraging angiographic safety and efficacy outcomes after placement in a rabbit sidewall saccular aneurysm model. Longer term studies are ongoing to determine eventual fate of the aneurysm, parent vessel, and jailed side branches after absorption of the polymer component of the stent.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49174,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interventional Neuroradiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"15910199241260896\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11571144/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interventional Neuroradiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199241260896\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199241260896","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:与现有的金属设备相比,基于生物可吸收聚合物的导流支架具有潜在的优势。本研究旨在使用体内兔侧壁囊状动脉瘤模型评估新型 ReSolv 装置的安全性和有效性:方法:将 ReSolv 支架植入 14 只接受过动脉瘤创建手术的新西兰白兔体内。动物被分配到 1、3、6、9、12、16 或 18 个月的随访时间点。血管造影图像由一名独立的神经介入专家使用雷蒙德-罗伊闭塞分类法(Raymond-Roy Occlusion Classification,RROC)、O'Kelly Marotta 分级法和 4F 血流分流预测评分进行评估,评估内容包括:(1) 支架内狭窄;(2) 母血管和狱侧支通畅;(3) 壁贴合;(4) 动脉瘤闭塞。主要疗效结果定义为 RROC I 级或 II 级:中位随访时间为 7.5 个月,所有病例的母血管(14/14)和狱侧(33/33)分支均通畅。支架上没有出现血栓,也没有出现明显的支架内狭窄,所有支架的壁贴合良好。85.7%(12 例)的动物发现了充分闭塞,其中 64.3%(9 例)为 RROC I 级,21.4%(3 例)为 RROC II 级:ReSolv支架在兔侧壁囊状动脉瘤模型中置入后,血管造影安全性和疗效令人鼓舞。目前正在进行更长期的研究,以确定支架的聚合物成分被吸收后,动脉瘤、母血管和被囚禁侧支的最终命运。
Angiographic Safety and Efficacy of the ReSolv Flow-Diverting Stent in a Rabbit Model.
Background: Bioresorbable polymer-based flow-diverting stents have potential benefits over existing metal devices. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the novel ReSolv device, which is a primarily polymer-based flow-diverting stent, using the in vivo rabbit sidewall saccular aneurysm model.
Methods: ReSolv stents were deployed in 14 New Zealand White rabbits that had undergone aneurysm creation procedures. Animals were allocated to follow-up time points of 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 16, or 18 months. Angiographic images were evaluated by an independent neurointerventionalist blinded to follow-up time points for (1) in-stent stenosis, (2) parent vessel and jailed side branch patency, (3) wall apposition, and (4) aneurysm occlusion using the Raymond-Roy Occlusion Classification (RROC), O'Kelly Marotta grading scale, and the 4F flow diversion predictive score. Primary efficacy outcome was defined as RROC Class I or II.
Results: At a median follow-up time of 7.5 months, parent vessel (14/14) and jailed side (33/33) branches were patent in all cases. There was no development of thrombus on the stent or cases of significant in-stent stenosis, and all stents had good wall apposition. Adequate occlusion was found in 85.7% (n = 12) of animals, including an RROC Class I in 64.3% (n = 9) and RROC Class II in 21.4% (n = 3).
Conclusions: The ReSolv stent shows encouraging angiographic safety and efficacy outcomes after placement in a rabbit sidewall saccular aneurysm model. Longer term studies are ongoing to determine eventual fate of the aneurysm, parent vessel, and jailed side branches after absorption of the polymer component of the stent.
期刊介绍:
Interventional Neuroradiology (INR) is a peer-reviewed clinical practice journal documenting the current state of interventional neuroradiology worldwide. INR publishes original clinical observations, descriptions of new techniques or procedures, case reports, and articles on the ethical and social aspects of related health care. Original research published in INR is related to the practice of interventional neuroradiology...