急性冠状动脉综合征 5 年后患者性别与家族性高胆固醇血症和长期心血管危险因素管理之间的关系。

IF 6.2 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Circulation-Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-20 DOI:10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.123.010790
Kristina Krasieva, Baris Gencer, Isabella Locatelli, David Carballo, Olivier Muller, Stéphane Fournier, Christian M Matter, Lorenz Räber, Nicolas Rodondi, François Mach, David Nanchen
{"title":"急性冠状动脉综合征 5 年后患者性别与家族性高胆固醇血症和长期心血管危险因素管理之间的关系。","authors":"Kristina Krasieva, Baris Gencer, Isabella Locatelli, David Carballo, Olivier Muller, Stéphane Fournier, Christian M Matter, Lorenz Räber, Nicolas Rodondi, François Mach, David Nanchen","doi":"10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.123.010790","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Long-term control of cardiovascular risk factors after acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is the cornerstone for preventing recurrence. We investigated the extent of cardiovascular risk factor management in males and females with and without familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) 5 years after ACS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We studied patients hospitalized for ACS between 2009 and 2017 in a Swiss multicenter prospective cohort study. FH was defined based on clinical criteria from the Dutch Lipid Clinic Network and Simon Broome definitions. Five years post-ACS, we assessed low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-c) levels, lipid-lowering therapy (LLT), and other cardiovascular risk factors, comparing males to females with and without FH using generalized estimating equations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 3139 patients were included; mean age was 61.4 years (SD, 12.1), 620 (19.8%) were female, and 747 (23.5%) had possible FH. Compared with males at 5-years post-ACS, females were more likely to not use statins (odds ratio, 1.61 [95% CI, 1.28-2.03]) and less likely to have combination LLT (odds ratio, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.55-0.93]), without difference between patients with FH and without FH. Females in both FH and non-FH groups less frequently reached LDL-c values ≤1.8 mmol/L (odds ratio, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.78-0.93]). Overall, patients with FH were more frequently on high-dose statins compared with patients without FH (51.0% versus 42.9%; <i>P</i>=0.001) and presented more frequently with a combination of 2 or more LLT compared with patients without FH (33.8% versus 17.7%; <i>P</i><0.001), but less frequently reached LDL-c targets of ≤1.8 mmol/L (33.5% versus 44.3%; <i>P</i><0.001) or ≤2.6 mmol/L (70.2% versus 78.1%; <i>P</i>=0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Five years after ACS, females had less intensive LLT and were less likely to reach target LDL-c levels than males, regardless of FH status. Males and females with FH had less optimal control of LDL-c despite more frequently taking high-dose statins or combination LLT compared with patients without FH. Long-term management of patients with ACS and FH, especially females, warrants optimization.</p>","PeriodicalId":49221,"journal":{"name":"Circulation-Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes","volume":" ","pages":"e010790"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11338030/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association Between Patient Sex and Familial Hypercholesterolemia and Long-Term Cardiovascular Risk Factor Management 5 Years After Acute Coronary Syndrome.\",\"authors\":\"Kristina Krasieva, Baris Gencer, Isabella Locatelli, David Carballo, Olivier Muller, Stéphane Fournier, Christian M Matter, Lorenz Räber, Nicolas Rodondi, François Mach, David Nanchen\",\"doi\":\"10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.123.010790\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Long-term control of cardiovascular risk factors after acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is the cornerstone for preventing recurrence. We investigated the extent of cardiovascular risk factor management in males and females with and without familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) 5 years after ACS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We studied patients hospitalized for ACS between 2009 and 2017 in a Swiss multicenter prospective cohort study. FH was defined based on clinical criteria from the Dutch Lipid Clinic Network and Simon Broome definitions. Five years post-ACS, we assessed low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-c) levels, lipid-lowering therapy (LLT), and other cardiovascular risk factors, comparing males to females with and without FH using generalized estimating equations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 3139 patients were included; mean age was 61.4 years (SD, 12.1), 620 (19.8%) were female, and 747 (23.5%) had possible FH. Compared with males at 5-years post-ACS, females were more likely to not use statins (odds ratio, 1.61 [95% CI, 1.28-2.03]) and less likely to have combination LLT (odds ratio, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.55-0.93]), without difference between patients with FH and without FH. Females in both FH and non-FH groups less frequently reached LDL-c values ≤1.8 mmol/L (odds ratio, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.78-0.93]). Overall, patients with FH were more frequently on high-dose statins compared with patients without FH (51.0% versus 42.9%; <i>P</i>=0.001) and presented more frequently with a combination of 2 or more LLT compared with patients without FH (33.8% versus 17.7%; <i>P</i><0.001), but less frequently reached LDL-c targets of ≤1.8 mmol/L (33.5% versus 44.3%; <i>P</i><0.001) or ≤2.6 mmol/L (70.2% versus 78.1%; <i>P</i>=0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Five years after ACS, females had less intensive LLT and were less likely to reach target LDL-c levels than males, regardless of FH status. Males and females with FH had less optimal control of LDL-c despite more frequently taking high-dose statins or combination LLT compared with patients without FH. Long-term management of patients with ACS and FH, especially females, warrants optimization.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49221,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Circulation-Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e010790\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11338030/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Circulation-Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.123.010790\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation-Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.123.010790","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)后心血管危险因素的长期控制是预防复发的基石。我们研究了患有和不患有家族性高胆固醇血症(FH)的男性和女性在急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)5年后的心血管危险因素控制程度:我们在一项瑞士多中心前瞻性队列研究中对 2009 年至 2017 年期间因 ACS 住院的患者进行了研究。FH的定义基于荷兰血脂诊所网络的临床标准和西蒙-布鲁姆的定义。ACS后五年,我们评估了低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-c)水平、降脂治疗(LLT)和其他心血管风险因素,并使用广义估计方程比较了男性和女性FH患者:共纳入3139名患者,平均年龄为61.4岁(SD,12.1),620人(19.8%)为女性,747人(23.5%)可能患有FH。与ACS后5年的男性相比,女性更有可能不使用他汀类药物(几率比为1.61 [95% CI, 1.28-2.03]),也更不可能联合使用LLT(几率比为0.72 [95% CI, 0.55-0.93]),但FH和非FH患者之间没有差异。FH组和非FH组中女性低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-c)值≤1.8 mmol/L的比例较低(几率比为0.78 [95% CI, 0.78-0.93])。总体而言,与非FH患者相比,FH患者更常服用大剂量他汀类药物(51.0%对42.9%;P=0.001),与非FH患者相比,FH患者更常合并2种或2种以上LLT(33.8%对17.7%;PPP=0.001):ACS发生5年后,与男性相比,无论FH状况如何,女性的LLT强化程度较低,达到目标LDL-c水平的可能性也较小。与无FH的患者相比,男性和女性FH患者尽管更频繁地服用大剂量他汀类药物或联合LLT,但其低密度脂蛋白胆固醇的最佳控制效果较差。需要优化对 ACS 和 FH 患者(尤其是女性)的长期管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Association Between Patient Sex and Familial Hypercholesterolemia and Long-Term Cardiovascular Risk Factor Management 5 Years After Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Background: Long-term control of cardiovascular risk factors after acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is the cornerstone for preventing recurrence. We investigated the extent of cardiovascular risk factor management in males and females with and without familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) 5 years after ACS.

Methods: We studied patients hospitalized for ACS between 2009 and 2017 in a Swiss multicenter prospective cohort study. FH was defined based on clinical criteria from the Dutch Lipid Clinic Network and Simon Broome definitions. Five years post-ACS, we assessed low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-c) levels, lipid-lowering therapy (LLT), and other cardiovascular risk factors, comparing males to females with and without FH using generalized estimating equations.

Results: A total of 3139 patients were included; mean age was 61.4 years (SD, 12.1), 620 (19.8%) were female, and 747 (23.5%) had possible FH. Compared with males at 5-years post-ACS, females were more likely to not use statins (odds ratio, 1.61 [95% CI, 1.28-2.03]) and less likely to have combination LLT (odds ratio, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.55-0.93]), without difference between patients with FH and without FH. Females in both FH and non-FH groups less frequently reached LDL-c values ≤1.8 mmol/L (odds ratio, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.78-0.93]). Overall, patients with FH were more frequently on high-dose statins compared with patients without FH (51.0% versus 42.9%; P=0.001) and presented more frequently with a combination of 2 or more LLT compared with patients without FH (33.8% versus 17.7%; P<0.001), but less frequently reached LDL-c targets of ≤1.8 mmol/L (33.5% versus 44.3%; P<0.001) or ≤2.6 mmol/L (70.2% versus 78.1%; P=0.001).

Conclusions: Five years after ACS, females had less intensive LLT and were less likely to reach target LDL-c levels than males, regardless of FH status. Males and females with FH had less optimal control of LDL-c despite more frequently taking high-dose statins or combination LLT compared with patients without FH. Long-term management of patients with ACS and FH, especially females, warrants optimization.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Circulation-Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes
Circulation-Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
357
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, an American Heart Association journal, publishes articles related to improving cardiovascular health and health care. Content includes original research, reviews, and case studies relevant to clinical decision-making and healthcare policy. The online-only journal is dedicated to furthering the mission of promoting safe, effective, efficient, equitable, timely, and patient-centered care. Through its articles and contributions, the journal equips you with the knowledge you need to improve clinical care and population health, and allows you to engage in scholarly activities of consequence to the health of the public. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes considers the following types of articles: Original Research Articles, Data Reports, Methods Papers, Cardiovascular Perspectives, Care Innovations, Novel Statistical Methods, Policy Briefs, Data Visualizations, and Caregiver or Patient Viewpoints.
期刊最新文献
Association Between Socioeconomic Disadvantage and Risks of Early and Recurrent Admissions Among Patients With Newly Diagnosed Heart Failure. Patient Preferences for Features Associated With Leadless Versus Conventional Transvenous Cardiac Pacemakers. Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and the Risk of Heart Failure Hospitalizations Among Individuals With Coronary Artery Disease. Artificial Intelligence Applications for Electrocardiography to Define New Digital Biomarkers of Cardiovascular Risk. Prognostic Significance and Associations of Neural Network-Derived Electrocardiographic Features.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1