Alejandro Rodríguez-Fernández, Filipe M Clemente, Rodrigo Ramírez-Campillo, Javier Sánchez-Sánchez
{"title":"通配球员和普通球员在小范围足球比赛中的运动和生理需求：守门员和通配球员类型的影响。","authors":"Alejandro Rodríguez-Fernández, Filipe M Clemente, Rodrigo Ramírez-Campillo, Javier Sánchez-Sánchez","doi":"10.1177/19417381241257175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Small-sided games (SSGs) are frequent training drills in soccer. This study investigated whether type of game (ie, with/without goalkeepers) and wildcard ( without vs internal vs external wildcard) impact the physiological (heartrate [HR]) and locomotor (total distance [TD] covered) demands in regular and wildcard players and to evaluate between-player and within-player variability.</p><p><strong>Hypothesis: </strong>Demands are influenced by wildcard and game type, with higher demand (distance covered at high intensities and sprint speed) in regular players and with higher variability in SSG with wildcard players.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Descriptive/comparative study.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level 4.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-four soccer players completed 6 SSG as 3 versus 3 without (NG) or with (GK) goalkeepers, and with internal (NG+IW and GK+IW) and external (NG+EW and GK+EW) wildcard. Average HR (HR<sub>avg</sub>), rate of perceived exertion, and locomotor demands (TD, medium [MID = 7.0-13.9 km h<sup>-1</sup>], high [HID = 14.0-20.9 km h<sup>-1</sup>] and sprint [SPD >21.0 km h<sup>-1</sup>] distance and peak speed [PS]) were registered.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The inclusion of GK and internal wildcard led to decreased HR<sub>avg</sub> and TD in regular players. Wildcard players positioned internally exhibited higher TD, PS, and lower HR<sub>avg</sub> than externally positioned wildcards. Regular players demonstrated higher TD, PS, MID, HID, HR<sub>avg</sub> and time spent in Z3 (>90% HR<sub>max</sub>) compared with wildcard players in SSG played with external wildcard. Regular and wildcard players displayed great between- and within-player variability in high-intensity metrics.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Specific game type and wildcard inclusion impact the physiological and locomotor demands in SSG, with variations observed between regular and wildcard players.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>This study provides comprehensive information on the physiological and locomotor demands of SSG depending on the inclusion and position of goalkeepers and wildcards, which can be useful for strength and conditioning coaches when designing specific training tasks, individualizing training load and applying return-to-play programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":54276,"journal":{"name":"Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Locomotor and Physiological Demands of Small-Sided Soccer Games in Wildcard and Regular Players: Effects of Goalkeepers and Type of Wildcard.\",\"authors\":\"Alejandro Rodríguez-Fernández, Filipe M Clemente, Rodrigo Ramírez-Campillo, Javier Sánchez-Sánchez\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/19417381241257175\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Small-sided games (SSGs) are frequent training drills in soccer. This study investigated whether type of game (ie, with/without goalkeepers) and wildcard ( without vs internal vs external wildcard) impact the physiological (heartrate [HR]) and locomotor (total distance [TD] covered) demands in regular and wildcard players and to evaluate between-player and within-player variability.</p><p><strong>Hypothesis: </strong>Demands are influenced by wildcard and game type, with higher demand (distance covered at high intensities and sprint speed) in regular players and with higher variability in SSG with wildcard players.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Descriptive/comparative study.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level 4.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-four soccer players completed 6 SSG as 3 versus 3 without (NG) or with (GK) goalkeepers, and with internal (NG+IW and GK+IW) and external (NG+EW and GK+EW) wildcard. Average HR (HR<sub>avg</sub>), rate of perceived exertion, and locomotor demands (TD, medium [MID = 7.0-13.9 km h<sup>-1</sup>], high [HID = 14.0-20.9 km h<sup>-1</sup>] and sprint [SPD >21.0 km h<sup>-1</sup>] distance and peak speed [PS]) were registered.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The inclusion of GK and internal wildcard led to decreased HR<sub>avg</sub> and TD in regular players. Wildcard players positioned internally exhibited higher TD, PS, and lower HR<sub>avg</sub> than externally positioned wildcards. Regular players demonstrated higher TD, PS, MID, HID, HR<sub>avg</sub> and time spent in Z3 (>90% HR<sub>max</sub>) compared with wildcard players in SSG played with external wildcard. Regular and wildcard players displayed great between- and within-player variability in high-intensity metrics.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Specific game type and wildcard inclusion impact the physiological and locomotor demands in SSG, with variations observed between regular and wildcard players.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>This study provides comprehensive information on the physiological and locomotor demands of SSG depending on the inclusion and position of goalkeepers and wildcards, which can be useful for strength and conditioning coaches when designing specific training tasks, individualizing training load and applying return-to-play programs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54276,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/19417381241257175\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19417381241257175","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景：小场比赛（SSG）是足球运动中经常使用的训练方法。本研究调查了比赛类型（即有/无守门员）和通配符（无通配符 vs 内部通配符 vs 外部通配符）是否会影响常规球员和通配符球员的生理（心率 [HR]）和运动（覆盖总距离 [TD]）需求，并评估球员之间和球员内部的差异性：研究设计：描述性/比较研究：证据等级：4 级：24名足球运动员以3对3的形式完成了6次SSG，分别是无守门员（NG）或有守门员（GK）的情况下，以及有内部（NG+IW和GK+IW）和外部（NG+EW和GK+EW）通配符的情况下。记录了平均心率（HRavg）、感觉消耗率和运动需求（TD、中[MID = 7.0-13.9 km h-1]、高[HID = 14.0-20.9 km h-1]和冲刺[SPD >21.0 km h-1]距离和峰值速度[PS]）：结果：GK和内部通配球员的加入导致普通球员的HRavg和TD下降。与外部通配相比，内部通配球员表现出更高的 TD、PS 和更低的 HRavg。在使用外部通配符的 SSG 比赛中，与通配符球员相比，普通球员表现出更高的 TD、PS、MID、HID、HRavg 和 Z3（>90% HRmax）时间。在高强度指标方面，普通球员和通配球员在球员之间和球员内部都存在很大差异：结论：特定的比赛类型和通配符的加入会影响 SSG 的生理和运动需求，常规和通配符球员之间也存在差异：这项研究提供了有关 SSG 生理和运动需求的全面信息，这些信息取决于门将和通配球员的加入和位置，这对力量和体能教练设计特定训练任务、个性化训练负荷和实施重返赛场计划非常有用。
Locomotor and Physiological Demands of Small-Sided Soccer Games in Wildcard and Regular Players: Effects of Goalkeepers and Type of Wildcard.
Background: Small-sided games (SSGs) are frequent training drills in soccer. This study investigated whether type of game (ie, with/without goalkeepers) and wildcard ( without vs internal vs external wildcard) impact the physiological (heartrate [HR]) and locomotor (total distance [TD] covered) demands in regular and wildcard players and to evaluate between-player and within-player variability.
Hypothesis: Demands are influenced by wildcard and game type, with higher demand (distance covered at high intensities and sprint speed) in regular players and with higher variability in SSG with wildcard players.
Study design: Descriptive/comparative study.
Level of evidence: Level 4.
Methods: Twenty-four soccer players completed 6 SSG as 3 versus 3 without (NG) or with (GK) goalkeepers, and with internal (NG+IW and GK+IW) and external (NG+EW and GK+EW) wildcard. Average HR (HRavg), rate of perceived exertion, and locomotor demands (TD, medium [MID = 7.0-13.9 km h-1], high [HID = 14.0-20.9 km h-1] and sprint [SPD >21.0 km h-1] distance and peak speed [PS]) were registered.
Results: The inclusion of GK and internal wildcard led to decreased HRavg and TD in regular players. Wildcard players positioned internally exhibited higher TD, PS, and lower HRavg than externally positioned wildcards. Regular players demonstrated higher TD, PS, MID, HID, HRavg and time spent in Z3 (>90% HRmax) compared with wildcard players in SSG played with external wildcard. Regular and wildcard players displayed great between- and within-player variability in high-intensity metrics.
Conclusion: Specific game type and wildcard inclusion impact the physiological and locomotor demands in SSG, with variations observed between regular and wildcard players.
Clinical relevance: This study provides comprehensive information on the physiological and locomotor demands of SSG depending on the inclusion and position of goalkeepers and wildcards, which can be useful for strength and conditioning coaches when designing specific training tasks, individualizing training load and applying return-to-play programs.
期刊介绍：
Sports Health: A Multidisciplinary Approach is an indispensable resource for all medical professionals involved in the training and care of the competitive or recreational athlete, including primary care physicians, orthopaedic surgeons, physical therapists, athletic trainers and other medical and health care professionals.
Published bimonthly, Sports Health is a collaborative publication from the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM), the American Medical Society for Sports Medicine (AMSSM), the National Athletic Trainers’ Association (NATA), and the Sports Physical Therapy Section (SPTS).
The journal publishes review articles, original research articles, case studies, images, short updates, legal briefs, editorials, and letters to the editor.
Topics include:
-Sports Injury and Treatment
-Care of the Athlete
-Athlete Rehabilitation
-Medical Issues in the Athlete
-Surgical Techniques in Sports Medicine
-Case Studies in Sports Medicine
-Images in Sports Medicine
-Legal Issues
-Pediatric Athletes
-General Sports Trauma
-Sports Psychology
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
