GenAI 海市蜃楼:人工幻觉时代的 "冒名顶替者 "偏差和深度防伪检测挑战

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Forensic Science International-Digital Investigation Pub Date : 2024-06-19 DOI:10.1016/j.fsidi.2024.301795
Mirko Casu , Luca Guarnera , Pasquale Caponnetto , Sebastiano Battiato
{"title":"GenAI 海市蜃楼:人工幻觉时代的 \"冒名顶替者 \"偏差和深度防伪检测挑战","authors":"Mirko Casu ,&nbsp;Luca Guarnera ,&nbsp;Pasquale Caponnetto ,&nbsp;Sebastiano Battiato","doi":"10.1016/j.fsidi.2024.301795","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper examines the impact of cognitive biases on decision-making in forensics and digital forensics, exploring biases such as confirmation bias, anchoring bias, and hindsight bias. It assesses existing methods to mitigate biases and improve decision-making, introducing the novel “Impostor Bias”, which arises as a systematic tendency to question the authenticity of multimedia content, such as audio, images, and videos, often assuming they are generated by AI tools. This bias goes beyond evaluators' knowledge levels, as it can lead to erroneous judgments and false accusations, undermining the reliability and credibility of forensic evidence. Impostor Bias stems from an a priori assumption rather than an objective content assessment, and its impact is expected to grow with the increasing realism of AI-generated multimedia products. The paper discusses the potential causes and consequences of Impostor Bias, suggesting strategies for prevention and counteraction. By addressing these topics, this paper aims to provide valuable insights, enhance the objectivity and validity of forensic investigations, and offer recommendations for future research and practical applications to ensure the integrity and reliability of forensic practices.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48481,"journal":{"name":"Forensic Science International-Digital Investigation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666281724001197/pdfft?md5=075f46e013a9e23ee24722c1470c6e5d&pid=1-s2.0-S2666281724001197-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"GenAI mirage: The impostor bias and the deepfake detection challenge in the era of artificial illusions\",\"authors\":\"Mirko Casu ,&nbsp;Luca Guarnera ,&nbsp;Pasquale Caponnetto ,&nbsp;Sebastiano Battiato\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.fsidi.2024.301795\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper examines the impact of cognitive biases on decision-making in forensics and digital forensics, exploring biases such as confirmation bias, anchoring bias, and hindsight bias. It assesses existing methods to mitigate biases and improve decision-making, introducing the novel “Impostor Bias”, which arises as a systematic tendency to question the authenticity of multimedia content, such as audio, images, and videos, often assuming they are generated by AI tools. This bias goes beyond evaluators' knowledge levels, as it can lead to erroneous judgments and false accusations, undermining the reliability and credibility of forensic evidence. Impostor Bias stems from an a priori assumption rather than an objective content assessment, and its impact is expected to grow with the increasing realism of AI-generated multimedia products. The paper discusses the potential causes and consequences of Impostor Bias, suggesting strategies for prevention and counteraction. By addressing these topics, this paper aims to provide valuable insights, enhance the objectivity and validity of forensic investigations, and offer recommendations for future research and practical applications to ensure the integrity and reliability of forensic practices.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48481,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forensic Science International-Digital Investigation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666281724001197/pdfft?md5=075f46e013a9e23ee24722c1470c6e5d&pid=1-s2.0-S2666281724001197-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forensic Science International-Digital Investigation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666281724001197\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic Science International-Digital Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666281724001197","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文研究了认知偏差对取证和数字取证决策的影响,探讨了确认偏差、锚定偏差和事后偏差等偏差。它评估了减轻偏差和改进决策的现有方法,并引入了新颖的 "冒名顶替偏差",这种偏差是一种系统性倾向,即质疑音频、图像和视频等多媒体内容的真实性,通常假定它们是由人工智能工具生成的。这种偏见超出了评估人员的知识水平,因为它会导致错误判断和错误指控,破坏法医证据的可靠性和可信度。冒名顶替偏见源于先验假设而非客观内容评估,随着人工智能生成的多媒体产品越来越逼真,其影响预计会越来越大。本文讨论了冒名顶替偏见的潜在原因和后果,并提出了预防和应对策略。通过探讨这些主题,本文旨在提供有价值的见解,提高法证调查的客观性和有效性,并为未来研究和实际应用提供建议,以确保法证实践的完整性和可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
GenAI mirage: The impostor bias and the deepfake detection challenge in the era of artificial illusions

This paper examines the impact of cognitive biases on decision-making in forensics and digital forensics, exploring biases such as confirmation bias, anchoring bias, and hindsight bias. It assesses existing methods to mitigate biases and improve decision-making, introducing the novel “Impostor Bias”, which arises as a systematic tendency to question the authenticity of multimedia content, such as audio, images, and videos, often assuming they are generated by AI tools. This bias goes beyond evaluators' knowledge levels, as it can lead to erroneous judgments and false accusations, undermining the reliability and credibility of forensic evidence. Impostor Bias stems from an a priori assumption rather than an objective content assessment, and its impact is expected to grow with the increasing realism of AI-generated multimedia products. The paper discusses the potential causes and consequences of Impostor Bias, suggesting strategies for prevention and counteraction. By addressing these topics, this paper aims to provide valuable insights, enhance the objectivity and validity of forensic investigations, and offer recommendations for future research and practical applications to ensure the integrity and reliability of forensic practices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
15.00%
发文量
87
审稿时长
76 days
期刊最新文献
Commentary:- Can I use that tool? Temporal metadata analysis: A learning classifier system approach Uncertainty and error in location traces Competence in digital forensics “What you say in the lab, stays in the lab”: A reflexive thematic analysis of current challenges and future directions of digital forensic investigations in the UK
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1