通过规范西班牙肿瘤科电子病历中的患者数据收集,提高医疗质量。

IF 1.3 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMJ Open Quality Pub Date : 2024-06-19 DOI:10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002732
Guillermo Alonso-Jáudenes Curbera, Martín Igor Gómez-Randulfe Rodríguez, Beatriz Alonso de Castro, Sofía Silva Díaz, Iria Parajó Vázquez, Paula Gratal, Rafael López López, Rosario García Campelo
{"title":"通过规范西班牙肿瘤科电子病历中的患者数据收集,提高医疗质量。","authors":"Guillermo Alonso-Jáudenes Curbera, Martín Igor Gómez-Randulfe Rodríguez, Beatriz Alonso de Castro, Sofía Silva Díaz, Iria Parajó Vázquez, Paula Gratal, Rafael López López, Rosario García Campelo","doi":"10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002732","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evaluation of quality of care in oncology is key in ensuring patients receive adequate treatment. American Society of Clinical Oncology's (ASCO) Quality Oncology Practice Initiative (QOPI) Certification Program (QCP) is an international initiative that evaluates quality of care in outpatient oncology practices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed free-text electronic medical records from patients with breast cancer (BR), colorectal cancer (CRC) or non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In a baseline measurement, high scores were obtained for the nine disease-specific measures of QCP Track (2021 version had 26 measures); thus, they were not further analysed. We evaluated two sets of measures: the remaining 17 QCP Track measures, as well as these plus other 17 measures selected by us (combined measures). Review of data from 58 patients (26 BR; 18 CRC; 14 NSCLC) seen in June 2021 revealed low overall quality scores (OQS)-below ASCO's 75% threshold-for QCP Track measures (46%) and combined measures (58%). We developed a plan to improve OQS and monitored the impact of the intervention by abstracting data at subsequent time points.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We evaluated potential causes for the low OQS and developed a plan to improve it over time by educating oncologists at our hospital on the importance of improving collection of measures and highlighting the goal of applying for QOPI certification. We conducted seven plan-do-study-act cycles and evaluated the scores at seven subsequent data abstraction time points from November 2021 to December 2022, reviewing 404 patients (199 BR; 114 CRC; 91 NSCLC). All measures were improved. Four months after the intervention, OQS surpassed the quality threshold and was maintained for 10 months until the end of the study (range, 78-87% for QCP Track measures; 78-86% for combined measures).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We developed an easy-to-implement intervention that achieved a fast improvement in OQS, enabling our Medical Oncology Department to aim for QOPI certification.</p>","PeriodicalId":9052,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Quality","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11191778/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving quality of care by standardising patient data collection in electronic medical records in an oncology department in Spain.\",\"authors\":\"Guillermo Alonso-Jáudenes Curbera, Martín Igor Gómez-Randulfe Rodríguez, Beatriz Alonso de Castro, Sofía Silva Díaz, Iria Parajó Vázquez, Paula Gratal, Rafael López López, Rosario García Campelo\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002732\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evaluation of quality of care in oncology is key in ensuring patients receive adequate treatment. American Society of Clinical Oncology's (ASCO) Quality Oncology Practice Initiative (QOPI) Certification Program (QCP) is an international initiative that evaluates quality of care in outpatient oncology practices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed free-text electronic medical records from patients with breast cancer (BR), colorectal cancer (CRC) or non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In a baseline measurement, high scores were obtained for the nine disease-specific measures of QCP Track (2021 version had 26 measures); thus, they were not further analysed. We evaluated two sets of measures: the remaining 17 QCP Track measures, as well as these plus other 17 measures selected by us (combined measures). Review of data from 58 patients (26 BR; 18 CRC; 14 NSCLC) seen in June 2021 revealed low overall quality scores (OQS)-below ASCO's 75% threshold-for QCP Track measures (46%) and combined measures (58%). We developed a plan to improve OQS and monitored the impact of the intervention by abstracting data at subsequent time points.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We evaluated potential causes for the low OQS and developed a plan to improve it over time by educating oncologists at our hospital on the importance of improving collection of measures and highlighting the goal of applying for QOPI certification. We conducted seven plan-do-study-act cycles and evaluated the scores at seven subsequent data abstraction time points from November 2021 to December 2022, reviewing 404 patients (199 BR; 114 CRC; 91 NSCLC). All measures were improved. Four months after the intervention, OQS surpassed the quality threshold and was maintained for 10 months until the end of the study (range, 78-87% for QCP Track measures; 78-86% for combined measures).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We developed an easy-to-implement intervention that achieved a fast improvement in OQS, enabling our Medical Oncology Department to aim for QOPI certification.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9052,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Open Quality\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11191778/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Open Quality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002732\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002732","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:评估肿瘤治疗质量是确保患者获得适当治疗的关键。美国临床肿瘤学会(ASCO)的优质肿瘤治疗实践计划(QOPI)认证项目(QCP)是一项评估肿瘤门诊治疗质量的国际计划:我们回顾性地查阅了乳腺癌(BR)、结直肠癌(CRC)或非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的自由文本电子病历。在基线测量中,QCP Track(2021 版有 26 项测量)的 9 项疾病特异性测量均获得了高分,因此未对其进行进一步分析。我们评估了两组指标:QCP Track 的其余 17 项指标,以及这些指标加上我们选择的其他 17 项指标(综合指标)。对 2021 年 6 月就诊的 58 名患者(26 名 BR;18 名 CRC;14 名 NSCLC)的数据进行审查后发现,QCP 跟踪指标(46%)和综合指标(58%)的总体质量得分(OQS)较低,低于 ASCO 75% 的阈值。我们制定了一项改善 OQS 的计划,并通过在后续时间点抽取数据来监测干预措施的效果:我们评估了 OQS 偏低的潜在原因,并制定了一项计划,通过向本院肿瘤科医生宣传改进措施收集的重要性并强调申请 QOPI 认证的目标,逐步改善 OQS。从 2021 年 11 月到 2022 年 12 月,我们实施了七个 "计划-实施-研究-行动 "周期,并在随后的七个数据抽取时间点对得分进行了评估,共审查了 404 例患者(199 例 BR;114 例 CRC;91 例 NSCLC)。所有指标均有所改善。干预4个月后,OQS超过了质量阈值,并保持了10个月,直到研究结束(QCP跟踪指标的范围为78-87%;综合指标为78-86%):我们开发了一种易于实施的干预措施,实现了 OQS 的快速改善,使我们的肿瘤内科实现了 QOPI 认证的目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Improving quality of care by standardising patient data collection in electronic medical records in an oncology department in Spain.

Background: Evaluation of quality of care in oncology is key in ensuring patients receive adequate treatment. American Society of Clinical Oncology's (ASCO) Quality Oncology Practice Initiative (QOPI) Certification Program (QCP) is an international initiative that evaluates quality of care in outpatient oncology practices.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed free-text electronic medical records from patients with breast cancer (BR), colorectal cancer (CRC) or non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In a baseline measurement, high scores were obtained for the nine disease-specific measures of QCP Track (2021 version had 26 measures); thus, they were not further analysed. We evaluated two sets of measures: the remaining 17 QCP Track measures, as well as these plus other 17 measures selected by us (combined measures). Review of data from 58 patients (26 BR; 18 CRC; 14 NSCLC) seen in June 2021 revealed low overall quality scores (OQS)-below ASCO's 75% threshold-for QCP Track measures (46%) and combined measures (58%). We developed a plan to improve OQS and monitored the impact of the intervention by abstracting data at subsequent time points.

Results: We evaluated potential causes for the low OQS and developed a plan to improve it over time by educating oncologists at our hospital on the importance of improving collection of measures and highlighting the goal of applying for QOPI certification. We conducted seven plan-do-study-act cycles and evaluated the scores at seven subsequent data abstraction time points from November 2021 to December 2022, reviewing 404 patients (199 BR; 114 CRC; 91 NSCLC). All measures were improved. Four months after the intervention, OQS surpassed the quality threshold and was maintained for 10 months until the end of the study (range, 78-87% for QCP Track measures; 78-86% for combined measures).

Conclusions: We developed an easy-to-implement intervention that achieved a fast improvement in OQS, enabling our Medical Oncology Department to aim for QOPI certification.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open Quality
BMJ Open Quality Nursing-Leadership and Management
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
226
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Achieving and sustaining reduction in hospital-acquired complications in an Australian local health service. Click and learn: a longitudinal interprofessional case-based sepsis education curriculum. Increasing the uptake of advance care directives through staff education and one-on-one support for people facing end-of-life. Community breast pain clinics can provide safe, quality care for women presenting with breast pain. Implementing a multisite shared haemodialysis care programme.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1