用于局部非转移性胰腺癌的立体定向磁共振引导的每日适应性 SABR (SMART):英国首次临床结果报告。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Clinical oncology Pub Date : 2024-05-25 DOI:10.1016/j.clon.2024.05.012
{"title":"用于局部非转移性胰腺癌的立体定向磁共振引导的每日适应性 SABR (SMART):英国首次临床结果报告。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.clon.2024.05.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims</h3><p>Prognosis of locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) remains poor with limited therapeutic options. Radiation therapy in pancreatic cancer has been restricted by the disease's proximity to radiosensitive organs at risk (OAR). However, stereotactic magnetic resonance-guided adaptive radiation therapy (SMART) has demonstrated promise in delivering ablative doses safely. We sought to report clinical outcomes from a UK-based Compassionate Access Programme that provided access to SMART to patients with LAPC.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>This was a registry retrospective study conducted at a single centre with access to SMART. Patients with LAPC were treated with prescription dose of 40 Gy in 5 fractions. The planning objective was that 98% of PTV received ≥95% of the prescribed dose, prioritising duodenal, stomach and bowel UK SABR consortium constraints. Daily online adaptation was performed using magnetic resonance guidance and on-table re-optimisation. 0–3 months and &gt; 3-month post-treatment-related toxicities, local progression-free survival, metastatic-free survival and overall survival were evaluated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>55 patients were treated with SMART at our institution from 2020 to 2022. Median follow-up from date of diagnosis was 17 months (range 5–37 months). Median age was 69.87% of patients underwent induction chemotherapy. 71% of patients reported 0–1 grade acute toxicity only. No grade &gt;3 acute toxicity was reported. 5 patients (9%) reported a grade 3 toxicity (fatigue, nausea, abdominal pain, duodenal stricture). No grade &gt;3 toxicity after 3 months was reported. 6 (10%) of patients had grade 3 toxicity (fatigue, nausea, abdominal pain, duodenal haemorrhage). Median local PFS post diagnosis was 17 months (95% CI 15.3–18.7). Median OS post diagnosis was 19 months (95% CI 15.9–22.1). One-year local control post SMART was 65%.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This is the first UK-reported experience of MR-guided daily adaptive pancreatic SABR. SMART shows promise in delivering ablative doses with acceptable toxicity rates and good clinical outcomes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10403,"journal":{"name":"Clinical oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0936655524001882/pdfft?md5=49f3cd2554f7a0672950d89ca35cf338&pid=1-s2.0-S0936655524001882-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stereotactic Magnetic Resonance-Guided Daily Adaptive SABR (SMART) for Localised Non-Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: First Reported Clinical Outcomes From the UK\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clon.2024.05.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Aims</h3><p>Prognosis of locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) remains poor with limited therapeutic options. Radiation therapy in pancreatic cancer has been restricted by the disease's proximity to radiosensitive organs at risk (OAR). However, stereotactic magnetic resonance-guided adaptive radiation therapy (SMART) has demonstrated promise in delivering ablative doses safely. We sought to report clinical outcomes from a UK-based Compassionate Access Programme that provided access to SMART to patients with LAPC.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>This was a registry retrospective study conducted at a single centre with access to SMART. Patients with LAPC were treated with prescription dose of 40 Gy in 5 fractions. The planning objective was that 98% of PTV received ≥95% of the prescribed dose, prioritising duodenal, stomach and bowel UK SABR consortium constraints. Daily online adaptation was performed using magnetic resonance guidance and on-table re-optimisation. 0–3 months and &gt; 3-month post-treatment-related toxicities, local progression-free survival, metastatic-free survival and overall survival were evaluated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>55 patients were treated with SMART at our institution from 2020 to 2022. Median follow-up from date of diagnosis was 17 months (range 5–37 months). Median age was 69.87% of patients underwent induction chemotherapy. 71% of patients reported 0–1 grade acute toxicity only. No grade &gt;3 acute toxicity was reported. 5 patients (9%) reported a grade 3 toxicity (fatigue, nausea, abdominal pain, duodenal stricture). No grade &gt;3 toxicity after 3 months was reported. 6 (10%) of patients had grade 3 toxicity (fatigue, nausea, abdominal pain, duodenal haemorrhage). Median local PFS post diagnosis was 17 months (95% CI 15.3–18.7). Median OS post diagnosis was 19 months (95% CI 15.9–22.1). One-year local control post SMART was 65%.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This is the first UK-reported experience of MR-guided daily adaptive pancreatic SABR. SMART shows promise in delivering ablative doses with acceptable toxicity rates and good clinical outcomes.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10403,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0936655524001882/pdfft?md5=49f3cd2554f7a0672950d89ca35cf338&pid=1-s2.0-S0936655524001882-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0936655524001882\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0936655524001882","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:局部晚期胰腺癌(LAPC)的预后仍然不佳,治疗方案有限。胰腺癌的放射治疗一直受到该疾病靠近放射敏感风险器官(OAR)的限制。不过,立体定向磁共振引导的自适应放射治疗(SMART)在安全地提供消融剂量方面已显示出前景。我们试图报告英国一项 "同情获取计划"(Compassionate Access Programme)的临床结果,该计划为LAPC患者提供了接受SMART治疗的机会:这是一项登记在册的回顾性研究,在一家可使用 SMART 的中心进行。LAPC 患者接受了处方剂量为 40 Gy、分 5 次进行的治疗。计划目标是98%的PTV接受≥95%的处方剂量,优先考虑十二指肠、胃和肠英国SABR联盟的限制。利用磁共振引导和台上再优化进行每日在线调整。对治疗后0-3个月和3个月以上的相关毒性反应、局部无进展生存期、无转移生存期和总生存期进行了评估:2020年至2022年,55名患者在我院接受了SMART治疗。自诊断之日起的中位随访时间为17个月(5-37个月)。中位年龄为69.87%的患者接受了诱导化疗。71%的患者仅报告了0-1级急性毒性。没有 >3 级急性毒性的报告。5名患者(9%)报告了3级毒性(疲劳、恶心、腹痛、十二指肠狭窄)。3 个月后,没有出现 3 级以上毒性的报告。6名患者(10%)出现3级毒性(疲劳、恶心、腹痛、十二指肠出血)。确诊后当地中位 PFS 为 17 个月(95% CI 15.3-18.7)。确诊后的中位OS为19个月(95% CI 15.9-22.1)。SMART 后一年的局部控制率为 65%:这是英国首次报道MR引导下的日常适应性胰腺SABR。SMART在提供消融剂量、可接受的毒性率和良好的临床效果方面显示出前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Stereotactic Magnetic Resonance-Guided Daily Adaptive SABR (SMART) for Localised Non-Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: First Reported Clinical Outcomes From the UK

Aims

Prognosis of locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) remains poor with limited therapeutic options. Radiation therapy in pancreatic cancer has been restricted by the disease's proximity to radiosensitive organs at risk (OAR). However, stereotactic magnetic resonance-guided adaptive radiation therapy (SMART) has demonstrated promise in delivering ablative doses safely. We sought to report clinical outcomes from a UK-based Compassionate Access Programme that provided access to SMART to patients with LAPC.

Materials and methods

This was a registry retrospective study conducted at a single centre with access to SMART. Patients with LAPC were treated with prescription dose of 40 Gy in 5 fractions. The planning objective was that 98% of PTV received ≥95% of the prescribed dose, prioritising duodenal, stomach and bowel UK SABR consortium constraints. Daily online adaptation was performed using magnetic resonance guidance and on-table re-optimisation. 0–3 months and > 3-month post-treatment-related toxicities, local progression-free survival, metastatic-free survival and overall survival were evaluated.

Results

55 patients were treated with SMART at our institution from 2020 to 2022. Median follow-up from date of diagnosis was 17 months (range 5–37 months). Median age was 69.87% of patients underwent induction chemotherapy. 71% of patients reported 0–1 grade acute toxicity only. No grade >3 acute toxicity was reported. 5 patients (9%) reported a grade 3 toxicity (fatigue, nausea, abdominal pain, duodenal stricture). No grade >3 toxicity after 3 months was reported. 6 (10%) of patients had grade 3 toxicity (fatigue, nausea, abdominal pain, duodenal haemorrhage). Median local PFS post diagnosis was 17 months (95% CI 15.3–18.7). Median OS post diagnosis was 19 months (95% CI 15.9–22.1). One-year local control post SMART was 65%.

Conclusion

This is the first UK-reported experience of MR-guided daily adaptive pancreatic SABR. SMART shows promise in delivering ablative doses with acceptable toxicity rates and good clinical outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical oncology
Clinical oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.80%
发文量
332
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Oncology is an International cancer journal covering all aspects of the clinical management of cancer patients, reflecting a multidisciplinary approach to therapy. Papers, editorials and reviews are published on all types of malignant disease embracing, pathology, diagnosis and treatment, including radiotherapy, chemotherapy, surgery, combined modality treatment and palliative care. Research and review papers covering epidemiology, radiobiology, radiation physics, tumour biology, and immunology are also published, together with letters to the editor, case reports and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors in Combination With Chemo or as Monotherapy vs. Chemotherapy Alone in Advanced, Unresectable HER2-Negative Gastric, Gastroesophageal Junction, and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: A Meta-Analysis. "If You're Talking, I Think You're Muted": Follow-up Analysis of Weekly Peer Review Discussion and Plan Changes After Transitioning From Virtual to In-Person Format. The Current use of Adaptive Strategies for External Beam Radiotherapy in Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review. The Use of Artificial Intelligence Technologies in Cancer Care. Response Letter to Laurelli et al. Letter to the Editor Regarding Enhancing Telemedicine to Improve Global Radiotherapy Access.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1