在运动中加入穆里根手法疗法比单独运动更能改善颈源性头痛患者的头痛频率、强度和残疾程度:随机试验。

IF 9.7 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Physiotherapy Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jphys.2024.06.002
Kiran Satpute , Nilima Bedekar , Toby Hall
{"title":"在运动中加入穆里根手法疗法比单独运动更能改善颈源性头痛患者的头痛频率、强度和残疾程度:随机试验。","authors":"Kiran Satpute ,&nbsp;Nilima Bedekar ,&nbsp;Toby Hall","doi":"10.1016/j.jphys.2024.06.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Question</h3><p>What is the effect of a 4-week regimen of Mulligan manual therapy (MMT) plus exercise compared with exercise alone for managing cervicogenic headache? Is MMT plus exercise more effective than sham MMT plus exercise? Are any benefits maintained at 26 weeks of follow-up?</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>A three-armed, parallel-group, randomised clinical trial with concealed allocation, blinded assessment of some outcomes and intention-to-treat analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>Ninety-nine people with cervicogenic headache as per International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD-3).</p></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><p>Participants were randomly allocated to 4 weeks of: MMT with exercise, sham MMT with exercise or exercise alone.</p></div><div><h3>Outcome measures</h3><p>The primary outcome was headache frequency. Secondary outcomes were headache intensity, headache duration, medication intake, headache-related disability, upper cervical rotation range of motion, pressure pain thresholds and patient satisfaction. Outcome measures were collected at baseline and at 4, 13 and 26 weeks.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>MMT plus exercise reduced headache frequency more than exercise alone immediately after the intervention (MD between groups in change from baseline: 2 days/month, 95% CI 2 to 3) and this effect was still evident at 26 weeks (MD 4 days, 95% CI 3 to 4). There were also benefits across all time points in several secondary outcomes: headache intensity, headache duration, headache-related disability, upper cervical rotation and patient satisfaction. Pressure pain thresholds showed benefits at all time points at the zygapophyseal joint and suboccipital areas but not at the upper trapezius. The outcomes in the sham MMT with exercise group were very similar to those of the exercise alone group.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In people with cervicogenic headache, adding MMT to exercise improved: headache frequency, intensity and duration; headache-related disability; upper cervical rotation; and patient satisfaction. These benefits were not due to placebo effects.</p></div><div><h3>Trial registration</h3><p>CTRI/2019/06/019506.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49153,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Physiotherapy","volume":"70 3","pages":"Pages 224-233"},"PeriodicalIF":9.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1836955324000572/pdfft?md5=d10478a29e8629b1154482ab0cedec3d&pid=1-s2.0-S1836955324000572-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mulligan manual therapy added to exercise improves headache frequency, intensity and disability more than exercise alone in people with cervicogenic headache: a randomised trial\",\"authors\":\"Kiran Satpute ,&nbsp;Nilima Bedekar ,&nbsp;Toby Hall\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jphys.2024.06.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Question</h3><p>What is the effect of a 4-week regimen of Mulligan manual therapy (MMT) plus exercise compared with exercise alone for managing cervicogenic headache? Is MMT plus exercise more effective than sham MMT plus exercise? Are any benefits maintained at 26 weeks of follow-up?</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>A three-armed, parallel-group, randomised clinical trial with concealed allocation, blinded assessment of some outcomes and intention-to-treat analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>Ninety-nine people with cervicogenic headache as per International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD-3).</p></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><p>Participants were randomly allocated to 4 weeks of: MMT with exercise, sham MMT with exercise or exercise alone.</p></div><div><h3>Outcome measures</h3><p>The primary outcome was headache frequency. Secondary outcomes were headache intensity, headache duration, medication intake, headache-related disability, upper cervical rotation range of motion, pressure pain thresholds and patient satisfaction. Outcome measures were collected at baseline and at 4, 13 and 26 weeks.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>MMT plus exercise reduced headache frequency more than exercise alone immediately after the intervention (MD between groups in change from baseline: 2 days/month, 95% CI 2 to 3) and this effect was still evident at 26 weeks (MD 4 days, 95% CI 3 to 4). There were also benefits across all time points in several secondary outcomes: headache intensity, headache duration, headache-related disability, upper cervical rotation and patient satisfaction. Pressure pain thresholds showed benefits at all time points at the zygapophyseal joint and suboccipital areas but not at the upper trapezius. The outcomes in the sham MMT with exercise group were very similar to those of the exercise alone group.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In people with cervicogenic headache, adding MMT to exercise improved: headache frequency, intensity and duration; headache-related disability; upper cervical rotation; and patient satisfaction. These benefits were not due to placebo effects.</p></div><div><h3>Trial registration</h3><p>CTRI/2019/06/019506.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49153,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Physiotherapy\",\"volume\":\"70 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 224-233\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1836955324000572/pdfft?md5=d10478a29e8629b1154482ab0cedec3d&pid=1-s2.0-S1836955324000572-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Physiotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1836955324000572\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Physiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1836955324000572","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

问题为期 4 周的穆里根手法疗法(Mulligan manual therapy,MMT)加运动疗法与单纯运动疗法相比,在治疗颈源性头痛方面效果如何?穆里根手法治疗加运动是否比假穆里根手法治疗加运动更有效?在 26 周的随访中,是否仍能保持疗效?三臂、平行组、随机临床试验,采用隐蔽分配、部分结果盲法评估和意向治疗分析:根据国际头痛疾病分类(ICHD-3),有99名颈源性头痛患者:干预:参与者被随机分配到为期4周的干预中:结果测量:主要结果是头痛频率。次要结果为头痛强度、头痛持续时间、药物摄入量、头痛相关残疾、上颈椎旋转运动范围、压痛阈值和患者满意度。结果在基线、4周、13周和26周时收集:干预后,MMT 加运动比单纯运动更能减少头痛频率(组间基线变化的 MD:2 天/月,95% CI 2 至 3),26 周后这种效果仍然明显(MD 4 天,95% CI 3 至 4)。在所有时间点上,以下几项次要结果也都有益处:头痛强度、头痛持续时间、头痛相关残疾、上颈椎旋转和患者满意度。压痛阈值显示,在所有时间点,颧骨关节和枕骨下区域均有获益,但斜方肌上部没有获益。假MMT加锻炼组的结果与单纯锻炼组非常相似:结论:对颈源性头痛患者而言,在运动的基础上添加 MMT 可改善以下方面:头痛频率、强度和持续时间;与头痛相关的残疾;上颈椎旋转;以及患者满意度。这些益处并非安慰剂效应所致:CTRI/2019/06/019506.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Mulligan manual therapy added to exercise improves headache frequency, intensity and disability more than exercise alone in people with cervicogenic headache: a randomised trial

Question

What is the effect of a 4-week regimen of Mulligan manual therapy (MMT) plus exercise compared with exercise alone for managing cervicogenic headache? Is MMT plus exercise more effective than sham MMT plus exercise? Are any benefits maintained at 26 weeks of follow-up?

Design

A three-armed, parallel-group, randomised clinical trial with concealed allocation, blinded assessment of some outcomes and intention-to-treat analysis.

Participants

Ninety-nine people with cervicogenic headache as per International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD-3).

Interventions

Participants were randomly allocated to 4 weeks of: MMT with exercise, sham MMT with exercise or exercise alone.

Outcome measures

The primary outcome was headache frequency. Secondary outcomes were headache intensity, headache duration, medication intake, headache-related disability, upper cervical rotation range of motion, pressure pain thresholds and patient satisfaction. Outcome measures were collected at baseline and at 4, 13 and 26 weeks.

Results

MMT plus exercise reduced headache frequency more than exercise alone immediately after the intervention (MD between groups in change from baseline: 2 days/month, 95% CI 2 to 3) and this effect was still evident at 26 weeks (MD 4 days, 95% CI 3 to 4). There were also benefits across all time points in several secondary outcomes: headache intensity, headache duration, headache-related disability, upper cervical rotation and patient satisfaction. Pressure pain thresholds showed benefits at all time points at the zygapophyseal joint and suboccipital areas but not at the upper trapezius. The outcomes in the sham MMT with exercise group were very similar to those of the exercise alone group.

Conclusions

In people with cervicogenic headache, adding MMT to exercise improved: headache frequency, intensity and duration; headache-related disability; upper cervical rotation; and patient satisfaction. These benefits were not due to placebo effects.

Trial registration

CTRI/2019/06/019506.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Physiotherapy
Journal of Physiotherapy ORTHOPEDICS-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
7.40%
发文量
69
审稿时长
72 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Physiotherapy is the official journal of the Australian Physiotherapy Association. It aims to publish high-quality research with a significant impact on global physiotherapy practice. The journal's vision is to lead the field in supporting clinicians to access, understand, and implement research evidence that will enhance person-centred care. In January 2008, the Journal of Physiotherapy became the first physiotherapy journal to adhere to the ICMJE requirement of registering randomized trials with a recognized Trial Registry. The journal prioritizes systematic reviews, clinical trials, economic analyses, experimental studies, qualitative studies, epidemiological studies, and observational studies. In January 2014, it also became the first core physiotherapy/physical therapy journal to provide free access to editorials and peer-reviewed original research. The Australian Physiotherapy Association extended their support for excellence in physiotherapy practice by sponsoring open access publication of all Journal of Physiotherapy content in 2016. As a result, all past, present, and future journal articles are freely accessible, and there are no author fees for publication.
期刊最新文献
Critically appraised paper: An internet intervention with or without telephone support in primary care is not superior to usual care for low back pain [commentary]. Critically appraised paper: An individualised, progressive walking and education intervention reduces the risk of low back pain recurrence [commentary]. Contents Critically appraised paper: Telerehabilitation consultations with a physiotherapist are non-inferior to in-person consultations for chronic knee pain Critically appraised paper: Telerehabilitation is non-inferior to in-person care for chronic knee pain [commentary]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1