Paul Bangirana, Amelia K Boehme, Annet Birabwa, Robert O Opoka, Deogratias Munube, Ezekiel Mupere, Phillip Kasirye, Grace Muwanguzi, Maxencia Musiimenta, George Ru, Nancy S Green, Richard Idro
{"title":"与同胞对照组相比,乌干达镰状细胞贫血症患儿的神经认知障碍:一项横断面研究。","authors":"Paul Bangirana, Amelia K Boehme, Annet Birabwa, Robert O Opoka, Deogratias Munube, Ezekiel Mupere, Phillip Kasirye, Grace Muwanguzi, Maxencia Musiimenta, George Ru, Nancy S Green, Richard Idro","doi":"10.3389/fstro.2024.1372949","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The neurocognitive functions in Ugandan children aged 1-12 years with sickle cell anemia (SCA) were compared to their non-SCA siblings to identify risk factors for disease-associated impairment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study of the neurocognitive functions in children with SCA (<i>N</i> = 242) and non-SCA siblings (<i>N</i> = 127) used age- and linguistically appropriate standardized tests of cognition, executive function, and attention for children ages 1-4 and 5-12. Test scores were converted to locally derived age-normalized <i>z</i>-scores. The SCA group underwent a standardized stroke examination for prior stroke and transcranial Doppler ultrasound to determine stroke risk by arterial flow velocity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The SCA group was younger than their siblings (mean ages 5.46 ± 3.0 vs. 7.11 ± 3.51 years, respectively; <i>p</i> < 0.001), with a lower hemoglobin concentration (7.32 ± 1.02 vs. 12.06 ± 1.42, <i>p</i> < 0.001). The overall cognitive SCA <i>z</i>-scores were lower, -0.73 ± 0.98, vs. siblings, -0.25 ± 1.12 (<i>p</i> < 0.001), with comparable findings for executive function of -1.09 ± 0.94 vs. -0.84 ± 1.26 (<i>p</i> = 0.045), respectively. The attention <i>z</i>-scores for ages 5-12 for the SCA group and control group were similar: -0.37 ± 1.4 vs. -0.11 ± 0.17 (<i>p</i> = 0.09). The overall differences in SCA status were largely driven by the older age group, as the <i>z</i>-scores in the younger subsample did not differ from controls. Analyses revealed the strongest predictors of poor neurocognitive outcomes among the SCA sample to be the disease, age, and prior stroke (each <i>p</i> < 0.001). The impacts of anemia and SCA were indistinguishable.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Neurocognitive testing in children with SCA compared to non-SCA siblings revealed poorer SCA-associated functioning in children older than age 4. The results indicate the need for trials assessing the impact of disease modification on children with SCA.</p>","PeriodicalId":73108,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in stroke","volume":"3 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11188974/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neurocognitive impairment in Ugandan children with sickle cell anemia compared to sibling controls: a cross-sectional study.\",\"authors\":\"Paul Bangirana, Amelia K Boehme, Annet Birabwa, Robert O Opoka, Deogratias Munube, Ezekiel Mupere, Phillip Kasirye, Grace Muwanguzi, Maxencia Musiimenta, George Ru, Nancy S Green, Richard Idro\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fstro.2024.1372949\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The neurocognitive functions in Ugandan children aged 1-12 years with sickle cell anemia (SCA) were compared to their non-SCA siblings to identify risk factors for disease-associated impairment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study of the neurocognitive functions in children with SCA (<i>N</i> = 242) and non-SCA siblings (<i>N</i> = 127) used age- and linguistically appropriate standardized tests of cognition, executive function, and attention for children ages 1-4 and 5-12. Test scores were converted to locally derived age-normalized <i>z</i>-scores. The SCA group underwent a standardized stroke examination for prior stroke and transcranial Doppler ultrasound to determine stroke risk by arterial flow velocity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The SCA group was younger than their siblings (mean ages 5.46 ± 3.0 vs. 7.11 ± 3.51 years, respectively; <i>p</i> < 0.001), with a lower hemoglobin concentration (7.32 ± 1.02 vs. 12.06 ± 1.42, <i>p</i> < 0.001). The overall cognitive SCA <i>z</i>-scores were lower, -0.73 ± 0.98, vs. siblings, -0.25 ± 1.12 (<i>p</i> < 0.001), with comparable findings for executive function of -1.09 ± 0.94 vs. -0.84 ± 1.26 (<i>p</i> = 0.045), respectively. The attention <i>z</i>-scores for ages 5-12 for the SCA group and control group were similar: -0.37 ± 1.4 vs. -0.11 ± 0.17 (<i>p</i> = 0.09). The overall differences in SCA status were largely driven by the older age group, as the <i>z</i>-scores in the younger subsample did not differ from controls. Analyses revealed the strongest predictors of poor neurocognitive outcomes among the SCA sample to be the disease, age, and prior stroke (each <i>p</i> < 0.001). The impacts of anemia and SCA were indistinguishable.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Neurocognitive testing in children with SCA compared to non-SCA siblings revealed poorer SCA-associated functioning in children older than age 4. The results indicate the need for trials assessing the impact of disease modification on children with SCA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73108,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in stroke\",\"volume\":\"3 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11188974/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in stroke\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fstro.2024.1372949\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/4/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in stroke","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fstro.2024.1372949","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
简介:研究人员比较了患有镰状细胞性贫血(SCA)的乌干达 1-12 岁儿童与非镰状细胞性贫血儿童的神经认知功能:研究人员将患有镰状细胞性贫血(SCA)的乌干达 1-12 岁儿童的神经认知功能与非镰状细胞性贫血儿童的兄弟姐妹的神经认知功能进行了比较,以确定疾病相关损伤的风险因素:这项针对镰状细胞性贫血患儿(242 人)和非镰状细胞性贫血患儿兄弟姐妹(127 人)神经认知功能的横断面研究采用了与年龄和语言相适应的认知、执行功能和注意力标准化测试,测试对象为 1-4 岁和 5-12 岁的儿童。测试分数被转换为当地得出的年龄归一化 z 分数。SCA组接受了标准中风检查,以确定是否有中风前兆,并接受经颅多普勒超声检查,通过动脉血流速度确定中风风险:结果:SCA 组比同龄人更年轻(平均年龄分别为 5.46±3.0 岁 vs. 7.11±3.51 岁;P <0.001),血红蛋白浓度更低(7.32±1.02 vs. 12.06±1.42,P <0.001)。SCA患者的整体认知能力z分数较低,为-0.73±0.98,而同龄人为-0.25±1.12(p<0.001),执行功能的结果与之相当,分别为-1.09±0.94,而同龄人为-0.84±1.26(p=0.045)。SCA组和对照组5-12岁的注意力z分数相似:-0.37 ± 1.4 vs. -0.11 ± 0.17 (p = 0.09)。SCA状态的总体差异主要由年龄较大的组别造成,因为年龄较小的子样本的z-分数与对照组没有差异。分析表明,在 SCA 样本中,预测神经认知不良后果的最强因素是疾病、年龄和既往中风(各 p < 0.001)。贫血和SCA的影响没有区别:讨论:与非SCA兄弟姐妹相比,SCA患儿的神经认知测试显示,4岁以上患儿的SCA相关功能较差。结果表明,有必要进行试验,评估疾病调整对 SCA 儿童的影响。
Neurocognitive impairment in Ugandan children with sickle cell anemia compared to sibling controls: a cross-sectional study.
Introduction: The neurocognitive functions in Ugandan children aged 1-12 years with sickle cell anemia (SCA) were compared to their non-SCA siblings to identify risk factors for disease-associated impairment.
Methods: This cross-sectional study of the neurocognitive functions in children with SCA (N = 242) and non-SCA siblings (N = 127) used age- and linguistically appropriate standardized tests of cognition, executive function, and attention for children ages 1-4 and 5-12. Test scores were converted to locally derived age-normalized z-scores. The SCA group underwent a standardized stroke examination for prior stroke and transcranial Doppler ultrasound to determine stroke risk by arterial flow velocity.
Results: The SCA group was younger than their siblings (mean ages 5.46 ± 3.0 vs. 7.11 ± 3.51 years, respectively; p < 0.001), with a lower hemoglobin concentration (7.32 ± 1.02 vs. 12.06 ± 1.42, p < 0.001). The overall cognitive SCA z-scores were lower, -0.73 ± 0.98, vs. siblings, -0.25 ± 1.12 (p < 0.001), with comparable findings for executive function of -1.09 ± 0.94 vs. -0.84 ± 1.26 (p = 0.045), respectively. The attention z-scores for ages 5-12 for the SCA group and control group were similar: -0.37 ± 1.4 vs. -0.11 ± 0.17 (p = 0.09). The overall differences in SCA status were largely driven by the older age group, as the z-scores in the younger subsample did not differ from controls. Analyses revealed the strongest predictors of poor neurocognitive outcomes among the SCA sample to be the disease, age, and prior stroke (each p < 0.001). The impacts of anemia and SCA were indistinguishable.
Discussion: Neurocognitive testing in children with SCA compared to non-SCA siblings revealed poorer SCA-associated functioning in children older than age 4. The results indicate the need for trials assessing the impact of disease modification on children with SCA.