前列腺癌治疗中的膀胱三叉神经放射治疗

IF 2.5 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Radiography Pub Date : 2024-06-20 DOI:10.1016/j.radi.2024.06.004
G. Chetiyawardana , E. Chadwick , S. Kordolaimi , S. Sundar
{"title":"前列腺癌治疗中的膀胱三叉神经放射治疗","authors":"G. Chetiyawardana ,&nbsp;E. Chadwick ,&nbsp;S. Kordolaimi ,&nbsp;S. Sundar","doi":"10.1016/j.radi.2024.06.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Evidence suggests the bladder trigone to be a potential organ at risk (OAR) in predicting acute and late genitourinary (GU) side effects when treating prostate cancer with radiotherapy.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A search of MEDLINE, Cinahl, EMBASE, PubMed, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and OpenGrey was conducted and no current or underway systematic reviews or scoping reviews on the topic were identified. A systematic literature review was carried out assessing the quality of this evidence. All evidence that prospectively or retrospectively reviewed radiotherapy or modelled radiotherapy dose to the bladder trigone were included. The search was conducted on the 8th July 2021 with 32 studies included in this review. This was repeated 10th June 2023 and two additional studies were identified. Any evidence published since this date have not been included and are a limitation of this review.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>MRI imaging is recommended to assist in delineating the trigone which has been shown to have a high amount of inter-observer variability and the use of specific training may reduce this. Across all radiotherapy treatment modalities, trigone dose contributed to GU acute and late toxicity symptoms. Trigone motion is relative to prostate motion but further research is required to confirm if the prostate can be used as a reliable surrogate for trigone position. The dose tolerance given for specific trigone related toxicities is debated within the literature, and on analysis the authors of this review suggest bladder trigone dose limits: Dmean &lt; 45.8 Gy, V61.0Gy &lt; 40%, V59.8Gy &lt; 25%, V42.5Gy-V41.0Gy &lt; 91% and V47.4Gy-V43.2Gy &lt; 91% with α/β of 3 Gy to reduce acute and late GU toxicities.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>There is evidence to support further research into bladder trigone sparing radiotherapy to improve patient outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Implication for practice</h3><p>Using the bladder trigone as an organ at risk is possible and the authors are currently seeking funding for a feasibility trial to further investigate this.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47416,"journal":{"name":"Radiography","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bladder trigone sparing radiotherapy in prostate cancer treatment\",\"authors\":\"G. Chetiyawardana ,&nbsp;E. Chadwick ,&nbsp;S. Kordolaimi ,&nbsp;S. Sundar\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.radi.2024.06.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Evidence suggests the bladder trigone to be a potential organ at risk (OAR) in predicting acute and late genitourinary (GU) side effects when treating prostate cancer with radiotherapy.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A search of MEDLINE, Cinahl, EMBASE, PubMed, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and OpenGrey was conducted and no current or underway systematic reviews or scoping reviews on the topic were identified. A systematic literature review was carried out assessing the quality of this evidence. All evidence that prospectively or retrospectively reviewed radiotherapy or modelled radiotherapy dose to the bladder trigone were included. The search was conducted on the 8th July 2021 with 32 studies included in this review. This was repeated 10th June 2023 and two additional studies were identified. Any evidence published since this date have not been included and are a limitation of this review.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>MRI imaging is recommended to assist in delineating the trigone which has been shown to have a high amount of inter-observer variability and the use of specific training may reduce this. Across all radiotherapy treatment modalities, trigone dose contributed to GU acute and late toxicity symptoms. Trigone motion is relative to prostate motion but further research is required to confirm if the prostate can be used as a reliable surrogate for trigone position. The dose tolerance given for specific trigone related toxicities is debated within the literature, and on analysis the authors of this review suggest bladder trigone dose limits: Dmean &lt; 45.8 Gy, V61.0Gy &lt; 40%, V59.8Gy &lt; 25%, V42.5Gy-V41.0Gy &lt; 91% and V47.4Gy-V43.2Gy &lt; 91% with α/β of 3 Gy to reduce acute and late GU toxicities.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>There is evidence to support further research into bladder trigone sparing radiotherapy to improve patient outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Implication for practice</h3><p>Using the bladder trigone as an organ at risk is possible and the authors are currently seeking funding for a feasibility trial to further investigate this.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47416,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiography\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1078817424001524\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1078817424001524","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言有证据表明,膀胱三叉神经是预测前列腺癌放疗急性和晚期泌尿生殖系统副作用的潜在风险器官(OAR)。方法对MEDLINE、Cinahl、EMBASE、PubMed、Cochrane系统综述数据库和OpenGrey进行了检索,未发现当前或正在进行的有关该主题的系统综述或范围界定综述。我们对这些证据的质量进行了系统的文献综述评估。所有对放疗或膀胱三叉神经放疗剂量建模进行前瞻性或回顾性审查的证据均被纳入其中。该检索于 2021 年 7 月 8 日进行,共纳入 32 项研究。2023 年 6 月 10 日再次进行搜索,又发现了两项研究。结果建议使用 MRI 成像来协助划定膀胱三叉神经,结果表明观察者之间的差异很大,使用特定的培训可以减少这种差异。在所有放疗方式中,三叉神经剂量都会导致 GU 急性和晚期毒性症状。三叉神经运动是相对于前列腺运动而言的,但前列腺是否能作为三叉神经位置的可靠替代物还需要进一步研究证实。文献中对特定三叉神经相关毒性的耐受剂量存在争议,本综述的作者在分析后提出了膀胱三叉神经的剂量限制:Dmean<45.8Gy、V61.0Gy<40%、V59.8Gy<25%、V42.5Gy-V41.0Gy<91%和V47.4Gy-V43.2Gy<91%,α/β为3Gy,以减少急性和晚期GU毒性。对实践的启示将膀胱三叉神经作为危险器官是可能的,作者目前正在寻求资金进行可行性试验,以进一步研究这一问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Bladder trigone sparing radiotherapy in prostate cancer treatment

Introduction

Evidence suggests the bladder trigone to be a potential organ at risk (OAR) in predicting acute and late genitourinary (GU) side effects when treating prostate cancer with radiotherapy.

Methods

A search of MEDLINE, Cinahl, EMBASE, PubMed, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and OpenGrey was conducted and no current or underway systematic reviews or scoping reviews on the topic were identified. A systematic literature review was carried out assessing the quality of this evidence. All evidence that prospectively or retrospectively reviewed radiotherapy or modelled radiotherapy dose to the bladder trigone were included. The search was conducted on the 8th July 2021 with 32 studies included in this review. This was repeated 10th June 2023 and two additional studies were identified. Any evidence published since this date have not been included and are a limitation of this review.

Results

MRI imaging is recommended to assist in delineating the trigone which has been shown to have a high amount of inter-observer variability and the use of specific training may reduce this. Across all radiotherapy treatment modalities, trigone dose contributed to GU acute and late toxicity symptoms. Trigone motion is relative to prostate motion but further research is required to confirm if the prostate can be used as a reliable surrogate for trigone position. The dose tolerance given for specific trigone related toxicities is debated within the literature, and on analysis the authors of this review suggest bladder trigone dose limits: Dmean < 45.8 Gy, V61.0Gy < 40%, V59.8Gy < 25%, V42.5Gy-V41.0Gy < 91% and V47.4Gy-V43.2Gy < 91% with α/β of 3 Gy to reduce acute and late GU toxicities.

Conclusion

There is evidence to support further research into bladder trigone sparing radiotherapy to improve patient outcomes.

Implication for practice

Using the bladder trigone as an organ at risk is possible and the authors are currently seeking funding for a feasibility trial to further investigate this.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Radiography
Radiography RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
34.60%
发文量
169
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Radiography is an International, English language, peer-reviewed journal of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy. Radiography is the official professional journal of the College of Radiographers and is published quarterly. Radiography aims to publish the highest quality material, both clinical and scientific, on all aspects of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy and oncology.
期刊最新文献
An enquiry into the usefulness of an information portal for Deaf and hard of hearing people prior to x-ray examinations and improvement ideas Morphometry-based radiomics for predicting prognosis in soft tissue sarcomas of extremities following radiotherapy Virtual reality simulation for mastery learning of wrist radiograph technique An initial exploration of factors that may impact radiographer performance in reporting mammograms Diagnostic radiography workforce expectations of learners against the 2023 HCPC standards of proficiency: Results of a UK Delphi study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1