Borja Gomez, Ana Mier, Alberto Ugedo, Amaia Aguirre-Quiñonero, Javier Benito, Santiago Mintegi
{"title":"尿液革兰氏染色在疑似尿路感染的发热幼儿中的作用:一项队列研究。","authors":"Borja Gomez, Ana Mier, Alberto Ugedo, Amaia Aguirre-Quiñonero, Javier Benito, Santiago Mintegi","doi":"10.1136/archdischild-2024-327182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyse the performance of the urine Gram stain for predicting a positive urine culture (UC) in young infants with fever without source (FWS) and pyuria.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Observational study; secondary analysis of a prospective registry-based cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Paediatric emergency department; tertiary teaching hospital.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Infants ≤90 days old with FWS, pyuria and urine Gram stain requested seen between 2010 and 2022.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure: </strong>Performance of the Gram stain, defined as positive if any bacteria were seen, for predicting urinary tract infection (UTI: UC by urethral catheterisation growing >10 000 CFU/mL of a single bacterial pathogen).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 367 febrile infants with pyuria, 281 (76.6%) had a positive Gram stain and 306 (83.3%) had a positive UC (277; 90.5% <i>Escherichia coli</i>).Rates of positive UC in patients with positive and negative Gram stains were 97.2% and 38.4%, respectively (p<0.01), showing a sensitivity of 89.2% (95% CI: 85.2% to 92.2%) and a specificity of 86.9% (95% CI: 76.2% to 93.2%). Sensitivity was lower for diagnosing UTIs caused by bacteria other than <i>E. coli</i> (69.0% vs 91.3% for UTIs caused by <i>E. coli</i>; p<0.01).Two (2.1%) of the 86 infants with negative Gram stains were diagnosed with bacteraemia unrelated to a UTI (<i>Streptococcus pneumoniae</i> and <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i>).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Around a third of infants with pyuria and a negative Gram stain will eventually be diagnosed with a UTI. These patients have a higher rate of UTIs caused by bacteria other than <i>E. coli</i>. Bacterial infections other than UTIs should also be considered in such cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":8150,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Disease in Childhood","volume":" ","pages":"801-805"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Role of urine Gram stain in young febrile infants with a suspected urinary tract infection: a cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Borja Gomez, Ana Mier, Alberto Ugedo, Amaia Aguirre-Quiñonero, Javier Benito, Santiago Mintegi\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/archdischild-2024-327182\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyse the performance of the urine Gram stain for predicting a positive urine culture (UC) in young infants with fever without source (FWS) and pyuria.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Observational study; secondary analysis of a prospective registry-based cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Paediatric emergency department; tertiary teaching hospital.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Infants ≤90 days old with FWS, pyuria and urine Gram stain requested seen between 2010 and 2022.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure: </strong>Performance of the Gram stain, defined as positive if any bacteria were seen, for predicting urinary tract infection (UTI: UC by urethral catheterisation growing >10 000 CFU/mL of a single bacterial pathogen).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 367 febrile infants with pyuria, 281 (76.6%) had a positive Gram stain and 306 (83.3%) had a positive UC (277; 90.5% <i>Escherichia coli</i>).Rates of positive UC in patients with positive and negative Gram stains were 97.2% and 38.4%, respectively (p<0.01), showing a sensitivity of 89.2% (95% CI: 85.2% to 92.2%) and a specificity of 86.9% (95% CI: 76.2% to 93.2%). Sensitivity was lower for diagnosing UTIs caused by bacteria other than <i>E. coli</i> (69.0% vs 91.3% for UTIs caused by <i>E. coli</i>; p<0.01).Two (2.1%) of the 86 infants with negative Gram stains were diagnosed with bacteraemia unrelated to a UTI (<i>Streptococcus pneumoniae</i> and <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i>).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Around a third of infants with pyuria and a negative Gram stain will eventually be diagnosed with a UTI. These patients have a higher rate of UTIs caused by bacteria other than <i>E. coli</i>. Bacterial infections other than UTIs should also be considered in such cases.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8150,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Disease in Childhood\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"801-805\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Disease in Childhood\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2024-327182\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Disease in Childhood","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2024-327182","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的分析尿液革兰氏染色法在预测无发热源(FWS)和脓尿的幼儿尿培养(UC)阳性方面的性能:观察性研究;基于前瞻性登记的队列研究的二次分析:儿童急诊科;三级教学医院:主要结果指标:主要结果指标:革兰氏染色预测尿路感染(UTI:通过尿道导管检查发现尿路感染中单个细菌病原体的CFU含量大于10 000 CFU/mL)的效果(若发现任何细菌则定义为阳性):在367名发热的脓尿婴儿中,281人(76.6%)革兰氏染色阳性,306人(83.3%)UC阳性(277人;90.5%为大肠埃希菌)。革兰氏染色阳性和阴性患者的UC阳性率分别为97.2%和38.4%(大肠埃希菌(69.0% vs 91.3%为大肠埃希菌引起的UTI;肺炎链球菌和金黄色葡萄球菌):结论:约有三分之一的脓尿和革兰氏染色阴性的婴儿最终会被诊断为尿毒症。这些患者患由大肠杆菌以外的细菌引起的尿毒症的比例较高。在这种情况下,还应考虑UTI 以外的细菌感染。
Role of urine Gram stain in young febrile infants with a suspected urinary tract infection: a cohort study.
Objective: To analyse the performance of the urine Gram stain for predicting a positive urine culture (UC) in young infants with fever without source (FWS) and pyuria.
Design: Observational study; secondary analysis of a prospective registry-based cohort study.
Patients: Infants ≤90 days old with FWS, pyuria and urine Gram stain requested seen between 2010 and 2022.
Main outcome measure: Performance of the Gram stain, defined as positive if any bacteria were seen, for predicting urinary tract infection (UTI: UC by urethral catheterisation growing >10 000 CFU/mL of a single bacterial pathogen).
Results: Among 367 febrile infants with pyuria, 281 (76.6%) had a positive Gram stain and 306 (83.3%) had a positive UC (277; 90.5% Escherichia coli).Rates of positive UC in patients with positive and negative Gram stains were 97.2% and 38.4%, respectively (p<0.01), showing a sensitivity of 89.2% (95% CI: 85.2% to 92.2%) and a specificity of 86.9% (95% CI: 76.2% to 93.2%). Sensitivity was lower for diagnosing UTIs caused by bacteria other than E. coli (69.0% vs 91.3% for UTIs caused by E. coli; p<0.01).Two (2.1%) of the 86 infants with negative Gram stains were diagnosed with bacteraemia unrelated to a UTI (Streptococcus pneumoniae and Staphylococcus aureus).
Conclusions: Around a third of infants with pyuria and a negative Gram stain will eventually be diagnosed with a UTI. These patients have a higher rate of UTIs caused by bacteria other than E. coli. Bacterial infections other than UTIs should also be considered in such cases.
期刊介绍:
Archives of Disease in Childhood is an international peer review journal that aims to keep paediatricians and others up to date with advances in the diagnosis and treatment of childhood diseases as well as advocacy issues such as child protection. It focuses on all aspects of child health and disease from the perinatal period (in the Fetal and Neonatal edition) through to adolescence. ADC includes original research reports, commentaries, reviews of clinical and policy issues, and evidence reports. Areas covered include: community child health, public health, epidemiology, acute paediatrics, advocacy, and ethics.