Tina Aumer, Maike Däther, Linda Bergmayr, Stephanie Kartika, Theodor Zeng, Qingyi Ge, Grazia Giorgio, Alexander J Hess, Stylianos Michalakis, Franziska R Traube
{"title":"地西他滨治疗后的 DNA 损伤反应类型取决于 DNMT 的活性水平。","authors":"Tina Aumer, Maike Däther, Linda Bergmayr, Stephanie Kartika, Theodor Zeng, Qingyi Ge, Grazia Giorgio, Alexander J Hess, Stylianos Michalakis, Franziska R Traube","doi":"10.26508/lsa.202302437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Decitabine and azacytidine are considered as epigenetic drugs that induce DNA methyltransferase (DNMT)-DNA crosslinks, resulting in DNA hypomethylation and damage. Although they are already applied against myeloid cancers, important aspects of their mode of action remain unknown, highly limiting their clinical potential. Using a combinatorial approach, we reveal that the efficacy profile of both compounds primarily depends on the level of induced DNA damage. Under low DNMT activity, only decitabine has a substantial impact. Conversely, when DNMT activity is high, toxicity and cellular response to both compounds are dramatically increased, but do not primarily depend on DNA hypomethylation or RNA-associated processes. By investigating proteome dynamics on chromatin, we show that decitabine induces a strictly DNMT-dependent multifaceted DNA damage response based on chromatin recruitment, but not expression-level changes of repair-associated proteins. The choice of DNA repair pathway hereby depends on the severity of decitabine-induced DNA lesions. Although under moderate DNMT activity, mismatch (MMR), base excision (BER), and Fanconi anaemia-dependent DNA repair combined with homologous recombination are activated in response to decitabine, high DNMT activity and therefore immense replication stress induce activation of MMR and BER followed by non-homologous end joining.</p>","PeriodicalId":18081,"journal":{"name":"Life Science Alliance","volume":"7 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11192838/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The type of DNA damage response after decitabine treatment depends on the level of DNMT activity.\",\"authors\":\"Tina Aumer, Maike Däther, Linda Bergmayr, Stephanie Kartika, Theodor Zeng, Qingyi Ge, Grazia Giorgio, Alexander J Hess, Stylianos Michalakis, Franziska R Traube\",\"doi\":\"10.26508/lsa.202302437\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Decitabine and azacytidine are considered as epigenetic drugs that induce DNA methyltransferase (DNMT)-DNA crosslinks, resulting in DNA hypomethylation and damage. Although they are already applied against myeloid cancers, important aspects of their mode of action remain unknown, highly limiting their clinical potential. Using a combinatorial approach, we reveal that the efficacy profile of both compounds primarily depends on the level of induced DNA damage. Under low DNMT activity, only decitabine has a substantial impact. Conversely, when DNMT activity is high, toxicity and cellular response to both compounds are dramatically increased, but do not primarily depend on DNA hypomethylation or RNA-associated processes. By investigating proteome dynamics on chromatin, we show that decitabine induces a strictly DNMT-dependent multifaceted DNA damage response based on chromatin recruitment, but not expression-level changes of repair-associated proteins. The choice of DNA repair pathway hereby depends on the severity of decitabine-induced DNA lesions. Although under moderate DNMT activity, mismatch (MMR), base excision (BER), and Fanconi anaemia-dependent DNA repair combined with homologous recombination are activated in response to decitabine, high DNMT activity and therefore immense replication stress induce activation of MMR and BER followed by non-homologous end joining.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18081,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Life Science Alliance\",\"volume\":\"7 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11192838/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Life Science Alliance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26508/lsa.202302437\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Print\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Life Science Alliance","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26508/lsa.202302437","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
地西他滨和阿扎胞苷被认为是表观遗传药物,可诱导DNA甲基转移酶(DNMT)-DNA交联,导致DNA低甲基化和损伤。虽然它们已被用于治疗骨髓性癌症,但其作用模式的重要方面仍然未知,这极大地限制了它们的临床潜力。利用组合方法,我们发现这两种化合物的药效主要取决于诱导的 DNA 损伤水平。在 DNMT 活性较低的情况下,只有地西他滨具有实质性影响。相反,当 DNMT 活性较高时,两种化合物的毒性和细胞反应都会显著增加,但这并不主要取决于 DNA 低甲基化或 RNA 相关过程。通过研究染色质上的蛋白质组动态,我们发现地西他滨会诱导严格依赖于 DNMT 的多方面 DNA 损伤反应,这种反应以染色质招募为基础,但与修复相关蛋白质的表达水平变化无关。因此,DNA修复途径的选择取决于地西他滨诱导的DNA损伤的严重程度。虽然在中等 DNMT 活性下,错配(MMR)、碱基切除(BER)和范可尼贫血症依赖的 DNA 修复结合同源重组会对地西他滨产生反应而被激活,但高 DNMT 活性和巨大的复制压力会诱导 MMR 和 BER 的激活,然后是非同源末端连接。
The type of DNA damage response after decitabine treatment depends on the level of DNMT activity.
Decitabine and azacytidine are considered as epigenetic drugs that induce DNA methyltransferase (DNMT)-DNA crosslinks, resulting in DNA hypomethylation and damage. Although they are already applied against myeloid cancers, important aspects of their mode of action remain unknown, highly limiting their clinical potential. Using a combinatorial approach, we reveal that the efficacy profile of both compounds primarily depends on the level of induced DNA damage. Under low DNMT activity, only decitabine has a substantial impact. Conversely, when DNMT activity is high, toxicity and cellular response to both compounds are dramatically increased, but do not primarily depend on DNA hypomethylation or RNA-associated processes. By investigating proteome dynamics on chromatin, we show that decitabine induces a strictly DNMT-dependent multifaceted DNA damage response based on chromatin recruitment, but not expression-level changes of repair-associated proteins. The choice of DNA repair pathway hereby depends on the severity of decitabine-induced DNA lesions. Although under moderate DNMT activity, mismatch (MMR), base excision (BER), and Fanconi anaemia-dependent DNA repair combined with homologous recombination are activated in response to decitabine, high DNMT activity and therefore immense replication stress induce activation of MMR and BER followed by non-homologous end joining.
期刊介绍:
Life Science Alliance is a global, open-access, editorially independent, and peer-reviewed journal launched by an alliance of EMBO Press, Rockefeller University Press, and Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. Life Science Alliance is committed to rapid, fair, and transparent publication of valuable research from across all areas in the life sciences.