肾肿块活检--一种实用且与临床病理相关的诊断方法。

IF 12.1 1区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Nature Reviews Urology Pub Date : 2024-06-21 DOI:10.1038/s41585-024-00897-5
Hussein Mansour, My-Anh Tran-Dang, Miles Walkden, Ekaterini Boleti, Ravi Barod, Prasad Patki, Faiz Mumtaz, Maxine G B Tran, Axel Bex, Soha El Sheikh
{"title":"肾肿块活检--一种实用且与临床病理相关的诊断方法。","authors":"Hussein Mansour, My-Anh Tran-Dang, Miles Walkden, Ekaterini Boleti, Ravi Barod, Prasad Patki, Faiz Mumtaz, Maxine G B Tran, Axel Bex, Soha El Sheikh","doi":"10.1038/s41585-024-00897-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Advancements in imaging modalities have increased the frequency of renal mass discovery. Imaging has typically been considered sufficient to guide management for a large proportion of these tumours, but renal mass biopsies (RMBs) have an increasing role in determining malignancy and can be a valuable tool for preventing unnecessary surgery in patients with benign tumours. A structured approach should be used to help to navigate the expanding repertoire of renal tumours, many of which are molecularly defined. In terms of tumour subtyping, the pathologist's strategy should focus on stratifying patients into clinically different prognostic groups according to our current knowledge of tumour behaviour, including benign, low-grade or indolent, intermediate malignant or highly aggressive. Crucial pathological features and morphological mimicry of tumours can alter the tumour's prognostic group. Thus, pathologists and urologists can use RMB to select patients with tumours at a reduced risk of progression, which can be safely managed with active surveillance within a tailored imaging schedule, versus tumours for which ablation or surgical intervention is indicated. RMB is also crucial in the oncological setting to distinguish between different high-grade tumours and guide tailored management strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":19088,"journal":{"name":"Nature Reviews Urology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":12.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Renal mass biopsy - a practical and clinicopathologically relevant approach to diagnosis.\",\"authors\":\"Hussein Mansour, My-Anh Tran-Dang, Miles Walkden, Ekaterini Boleti, Ravi Barod, Prasad Patki, Faiz Mumtaz, Maxine G B Tran, Axel Bex, Soha El Sheikh\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41585-024-00897-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Advancements in imaging modalities have increased the frequency of renal mass discovery. Imaging has typically been considered sufficient to guide management for a large proportion of these tumours, but renal mass biopsies (RMBs) have an increasing role in determining malignancy and can be a valuable tool for preventing unnecessary surgery in patients with benign tumours. A structured approach should be used to help to navigate the expanding repertoire of renal tumours, many of which are molecularly defined. In terms of tumour subtyping, the pathologist's strategy should focus on stratifying patients into clinically different prognostic groups according to our current knowledge of tumour behaviour, including benign, low-grade or indolent, intermediate malignant or highly aggressive. Crucial pathological features and morphological mimicry of tumours can alter the tumour's prognostic group. Thus, pathologists and urologists can use RMB to select patients with tumours at a reduced risk of progression, which can be safely managed with active surveillance within a tailored imaging schedule, versus tumours for which ablation or surgical intervention is indicated. RMB is also crucial in the oncological setting to distinguish between different high-grade tumours and guide tailored management strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19088,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nature Reviews Urology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nature Reviews Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41585-024-00897-5\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Reviews Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41585-024-00897-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

成像模式的进步增加了肾肿块的发现频率。影像学通常被认为足以指导大部分此类肿瘤的治疗,但肾肿块活检(RMBs)在确定恶性程度方面发挥着越来越重要的作用,是避免良性肿瘤患者接受不必要手术的重要工具。应采用一种结构化的方法来帮助了解不断扩大的肾肿瘤种类,其中许多肿瘤都有分子定义。就肿瘤亚型而言,病理学家的策略应侧重于根据我们目前对肿瘤行为的了解,将患者分为临床上不同的预后组别,包括良性、低度或轻度、中度恶性或高度侵袭性。肿瘤的关键病理特征和形态学模拟可改变肿瘤的预后分组。因此,病理学家和泌尿科医生可以利用红外线成像技术来选择肿瘤进展风险较低的患者,这些患者可以通过量身定制的成像计划进行积极的监测,从而安全地控制肿瘤的进展。在肿瘤学领域,红外线成像对于区分不同的高级别肿瘤和指导量身定制的管理策略也至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Renal mass biopsy - a practical and clinicopathologically relevant approach to diagnosis.

Advancements in imaging modalities have increased the frequency of renal mass discovery. Imaging has typically been considered sufficient to guide management for a large proportion of these tumours, but renal mass biopsies (RMBs) have an increasing role in determining malignancy and can be a valuable tool for preventing unnecessary surgery in patients with benign tumours. A structured approach should be used to help to navigate the expanding repertoire of renal tumours, many of which are molecularly defined. In terms of tumour subtyping, the pathologist's strategy should focus on stratifying patients into clinically different prognostic groups according to our current knowledge of tumour behaviour, including benign, low-grade or indolent, intermediate malignant or highly aggressive. Crucial pathological features and morphological mimicry of tumours can alter the tumour's prognostic group. Thus, pathologists and urologists can use RMB to select patients with tumours at a reduced risk of progression, which can be safely managed with active surveillance within a tailored imaging schedule, versus tumours for which ablation or surgical intervention is indicated. RMB is also crucial in the oncological setting to distinguish between different high-grade tumours and guide tailored management strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nature Reviews Urology
Nature Reviews Urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
2.60%
发文量
123
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nature Reviews Urology is part of the Nature Reviews portfolio of journals.Nature Reviews' basic, translational and clinical content is written by internationally renowned basic and clinical academics and researchers. This journal targeted readers in the biological and medical sciences, from the postgraduate level upwards, aiming to be accessible to professionals in any biological or medical discipline. The journal features authoritative In-depth Reviews providing up-to-date information on topics within a field's history and development. Perspectives, News & Views articles, and the Research Highlights section offer topical discussions and opinions, filtering primary research from various medical journals. Covering a wide range of subjects, including andrology, urologic oncology, and imaging, Nature Reviews provides valuable insights for practitioners, researchers, and academics within urology and related fields.
期刊最新文献
Prostate cancer in transgender women — challenges in research and clinical care Pre-treatment metastatic biopsy: a step towards precision oncology for urothelial cancer 20 years of ‘spilling the tea’ in urology Author Correction: Metaverse in surgery - origins and future potential. Racial disparities in prostate cancer in the UK and the USA: similarities, differences and steps forwards
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1