[为临床医学服务的临床研究:保罗-马尔蒂尼 "临床证明 "的内涵、实践、方法和理论--第四部分:采纳、共鸣和简历]。

{"title":"[为临床医学服务的临床研究:保罗-马尔蒂尼 \"临床证明 \"的内涵、实践、方法和理论--第四部分:采纳、共鸣和简历]。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.zefq.2024.05.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Having dealt with Martini's understanding of causality and his procedural elements of evidence in the third part, the concluding article once again takes a historical perspective. It (1) traces the positionings and contexts of Martini’s methodology in a sort of historical longitudinal section and (2) discusses the reasons for the rather reluctant response to his research programme in German and international medicine. We then focus (3) on Martini’s understanding and concept of clinical research, the specific challenges he faced in post-war German medicine – and what remains of it today. Finally, we summarise the key findings of our article series and reflect on Martini’s work in terms of its special nature and significance for clinical medicine in the 20<sup>th</sup> century.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46628,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualitaet im Gesundheitswesen","volume":"188 ","pages":"Pages 95-103"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1865921724000898/pdfft?md5=6634f45fbb6c8524a7d17b6912630fd9&pid=1-s2.0-S1865921724000898-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Klinische Forschung im Dienst der Heilkunde: Kontexte, Praxis, Methodik und Theorie des „klinischen Beweises“ von Paul Martini – Beitrag 4: Rezeption, Resonanz und Resümee\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.zefq.2024.05.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Having dealt with Martini's understanding of causality and his procedural elements of evidence in the third part, the concluding article once again takes a historical perspective. It (1) traces the positionings and contexts of Martini’s methodology in a sort of historical longitudinal section and (2) discusses the reasons for the rather reluctant response to his research programme in German and international medicine. We then focus (3) on Martini’s understanding and concept of clinical research, the specific challenges he faced in post-war German medicine – and what remains of it today. Finally, we summarise the key findings of our article series and reflect on Martini’s work in terms of its special nature and significance for clinical medicine in the 20<sup>th</sup> century.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46628,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeitschrift fur Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualitaet im Gesundheitswesen\",\"volume\":\"188 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 95-103\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1865921724000898/pdfft?md5=6634f45fbb6c8524a7d17b6912630fd9&pid=1-s2.0-S1865921724000898-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeitschrift fur Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualitaet im Gesundheitswesen\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1865921724000898\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualitaet im Gesundheitswesen","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1865921724000898","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在第三部分论述了马尔蒂尼对因果关系的理解和他的证据程序要素之后,结论文章再次从历史的角度出发。文章(1)以一种历史纵向的方式追溯了马尔蒂尼方法论的定位和背景,(2)讨论了德国和国际医学界对他的研究计划反应冷淡的原因。然后,我们将重点(3)放在马尔蒂尼对临床研究的理解和概念、他在战后德国医学界所面临的具体挑战--以及今天医学界所保留的东西。最后,我们总结了我们系列文章的主要发现,并从其特殊性质和对 20 世纪临床医学的重要意义方面对马尔蒂尼的工作进行了反思。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Klinische Forschung im Dienst der Heilkunde: Kontexte, Praxis, Methodik und Theorie des „klinischen Beweises“ von Paul Martini – Beitrag 4: Rezeption, Resonanz und Resümee

Having dealt with Martini's understanding of causality and his procedural elements of evidence in the third part, the concluding article once again takes a historical perspective. It (1) traces the positionings and contexts of Martini’s methodology in a sort of historical longitudinal section and (2) discusses the reasons for the rather reluctant response to his research programme in German and international medicine. We then focus (3) on Martini’s understanding and concept of clinical research, the specific challenges he faced in post-war German medicine – and what remains of it today. Finally, we summarise the key findings of our article series and reflect on Martini’s work in terms of its special nature and significance for clinical medicine in the 20th century.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
18.20%
发文量
129
期刊最新文献
[Active involvement of patients in primary care research: Evaluation of the NRW.GPRN patient advisory board]. [Nursing through a child's eyes - A qualitative image analysis of children's drawings]. Barriers to opioid substitution therapy in primary care: A survey among general practitioners in Germany. [The KKS examiner course as a qualification measure for GP practices to participate in clinical research: A qualitative study with participants from the SaxoForN research practice network]. Reliability and validity of the German "Evidence-Based Practice Confidence (EPIC) Scale" for allied health professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1